Department of Economics, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2016 Dec 1;5(12):693-703. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.65.
Access to appropriate and affordable healthcare is needed to achieve better health outcomes in Africa. However, access to healthcare remains low, especially among the poor. In Zambia, poor access exists despite the policy by the government to remove user fees in all primary healthcare facilities in the public sector. The paper has two main objectives: (i) to examine the factors associated with healthcare choices among sick people, and (ii) to assess the determinants of the magnitude of out-of-pocket (OOP) payments related to a visit to a health provider.
This paper employs a multilevel multinomial logistic regression to model the determinants of an individual's choice of healthcare options following an illness. Further, the study analyses the drivers of the magnitude of OOP expenditure related to a visit to a health provider using a two-part generalised linear model. The analysis is based on a nationally representative healthcare utilisation and expenditure survey that was conducted in 2014.
Household per capita consumption expenditure is significantly associated with increased odds of seeking formal care (odds ratio [OR] = 1.12, P = .000). Living in a household in which the head has a higher level of education is associated with increased odds of seeking formal healthcare (OR = 1.54, P = .000) and (OR = 1.55, P = .01), for secondary and tertiary education, respectively. Rural residence is associated with reduced odds of seeking formal care (OR = 0.706, P = .002). The magnitude of OOP expenditure during a visit is significantly dependent on household economic well-being, distance from a health facility, among other factors. A 10% increase in per capita consumption expenditure was associated with a 0.2% increase in OOP health expenditure while every kilometre travelled was associated with a K0.51 increase in OOP health expenditure.
Despite the removal of user fees on public primary healthcare in Zambia, access to healthcare is highly dependent on an individual's socio-economic status, illness type and region of residence. These findings also suggest that the benefits of free public healthcare may not reach the poorest proportionately, which raise implications for increasing access in Zambia and other countries in sub-Saharan Africa.
为了在非洲取得更好的健康成果,需要获得适当和负担得起的医疗保健。然而,获得医疗保健的机会仍然很低,尤其是在贫困人口中。尽管赞比亚政府制定了政策,要取消公共部门所有初级保健机构的用户费用,但获得医疗保健的机会仍然很低。本文有两个主要目标:(i)研究与病人的医疗保健选择相关的因素,以及(ii)评估与就诊相关的自付费用(OOP)支付额的决定因素。
本文采用多水平多项逻辑回归模型来模拟个体患病后的医疗保健选择的决定因素。此外,该研究还使用两部分广义线性模型分析与就诊相关的 OOP 支出额的驱动因素。分析基于 2014 年进行的一项全国性的医疗保健利用和支出调查。
家庭人均消费支出与寻求正规医疗服务的几率增加显著相关(优势比[OR] = 1.12,P =.000)。家中户主受教育程度较高与寻求正规医疗保健服务的几率增加有关(OR = 1.54,P =.000)和(OR = 1.55,P =.01),分别为中学和高等教育。农村居住与寻求正规医疗服务的几率降低有关(OR = 0.706,P =.002)。就诊期间 OOP 支出额的大小与家庭经济状况、距医疗机构的距离等因素显著相关。人均消费支出增加 10%,OOP 医疗支出增加 0.2%,每公里旅行增加 OOP 医疗支出增加 K0.51。
尽管赞比亚取消了公共初级保健的用户费用,但获得医疗保健的机会高度依赖于个人的社会经济地位、疾病类型和居住地区。这些发现还表明,免费公共医疗保健的好处可能没有按比例惠及最贫困的人群,这对增加赞比亚和撒哈拉以南非洲其他国家的获得医疗保健的机会提出了挑战。