Neugarten Rachel A, Honzák Miroslav, Carret Pierre, Koenig Kellee, Andriamaro Luciano, Cano Carlos Andres, Grantham Hedley S, Hole David, Juhn Daniel, McKinnon Madeleine, Rasolohery Andriambolantsoa, Steininger Marc, Wright Timothy Max, Turner Will R
Conservation International, Arlington, Virginia, United States of America.
Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund, Arlington, Virginia, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 22;11(12):e0168575. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168575. eCollection 2016.
The importance of ecosystems for supporting human well-being is increasingly recognized by both the conservation and development sectors. Our ability to conserve ecosystems that people rely on is often limited by a lack of spatially explicit data on the location and distribution of ecosystem services (ES), the benefits provided by nature to people. Thus there is a need to map ES to guide conservation investments, to ensure these co-benefits are maintained. To target conservation investments most effectively, ES assessments must be rigorous enough to support conservation planning, rapid enough to respond to decision-making timelines, and often must rely on existing data. We developed a framework for rapid spatial assessment of ES that relies on expert and stakeholder consultation, available data, and spatial analyses in order to rapidly identify sites providing multiple benefits. We applied the framework in Madagascar, a country with globally significant biodiversity and a high level of human dependence on ecosystems. Our objective was to identify the ES co-benefits of biodiversity priority areas in order to guide the investment strategy of a global conservation fund. We assessed key provisioning (fisheries, hunting and non-timber forest products, and water for domestic use, agriculture, and hydropower), regulating (climate mitigation, flood risk reduction and coastal protection), and cultural (nature tourism) ES. We also conducted multi-criteria analyses to identify sites providing multiple benefits. While our approach has limitations, including the reliance on proximity-based indicators for several ES, the results were useful for targeting conservation investments by the Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF). Because our approach relies on available data, standardized methods for linking ES provision to ES use, and expert validation, it has the potential to quickly guide conservation planning and investment decisions in other data-poor regions.
保护和发展部门越来越认识到生态系统对支持人类福祉的重要性。我们保护人们所依赖的生态系统的能力往往受到限制,因为缺乏关于生态系统服务(ES)的位置和分布的空间明确数据,生态系统服务即自然为人们提供的益处。因此,需要绘制生态系统服务图来指导保护投资,以确保这些共同效益得以维持。为了最有效地确定保护投资目标,生态系统服务评估必须足够严谨以支持保护规划,足够迅速以响应决策时间表,并且通常必须依赖现有数据。我们开发了一个生态系统服务快速空间评估框架,该框架依赖专家和利益相关者的咨询、现有数据以及空间分析,以便快速识别提供多种效益的地点。我们在马达加斯加应用了该框架,马达加斯加是一个具有全球重要生物多样性且人类对生态系统高度依赖的国家。我们的目标是确定生物多样性优先区域的生态系统服务共同效益,以指导全球保护基金的投资策略。我们评估了关键的供给(渔业、狩猎和非木材林产品以及生活用水、农业用水和水电用水)、调节(气候缓解、洪水风险降低和海岸保护)和文化(自然旅游)生态系统服务。我们还进行了多标准分析,以识别提供多种效益的地点。虽然我们的方法存在局限性,包括对几种生态系统服务依赖基于邻近度的指标,但结果对于关键生态系统伙伴关系基金(CEPF)确定保护投资目标很有用。由于我们的方法依赖现有数据、将生态系统服务供给与使用相联系的标准化方法以及专家验证,它有可能在其他数据匮乏地区快速指导保护规划和投资决策。