Krakowski Menahem I, Czobor Pal
The Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, 140 Old Orangeburg Rd, Orangeburg, NY 10962, USA; New York University School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY, USA.
Departments of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Schizophr Res. 2017 Jun;184:82-87. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2016.11.038. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
Research on aggression in schizophrenia has focused on narrowly defined deficits, while ignoring interconnections among these impairments which provide better explanatory power. Our goal was to investigate interrelations among impairments in important domains related to aggression: personality traits, including psychopathy and impulsivity, cognition and processing of emotions.
34 healthy controls, 37 high aggression (HAG) and 31 low aggression (LAG) patients with schizophrenia participated. The Barratt Impulsiveness Scale, Psychopathy Checklist, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST), and Emotion Recognition Test were administered. Psychiatric symptoms were assessed. Canonical Discriminant Analysis (CDA) was performed to determine how these measures distinguish among the groups and to identify underlying symptom profiles.
CDA revealed two statistically significant profiles of deficits which differentiated the groups. The first comprises impulsivity, psychopathy, and impairments in cognition and fear recognition. It indicates proneness to aggression. The second consists of WCST perseverative errors and facial affect processing impairment; it has an inverse relationship with aggression. These profiles are linked to different psychiatric symptoms in the schizophrenic patients: The first to excitement and poor impulse control; the second to blunted affect and motor retardation. HAG's manifested primarily the first; LAG's had a moderate score on the first and a high score on the second.
Proneness to aggression in schizophrenia is characterized by a multivariate confluence of impulsivity, psychopathy, cognitive difficulties and impairment in fear recognition. There exists, however, a second pattern of psychopathology that may suppress expression of aggression. These opposing patterns have important implications for integrated treatments of aggression.
精神分裂症攻击行为的研究主要集中在狭义定义的缺陷上,而忽略了这些损伤之间的相互联系,而这些联系具有更强的解释力。我们的目标是研究与攻击行为相关的重要领域的损伤之间的相互关系:人格特质,包括精神病态和冲动性、认知和情绪处理。
34名健康对照者、37名高攻击型(HAG)和31名低攻击型(LAG)精神分裂症患者参与研究。采用巴拉特冲动量表、精神病态检查表、威斯康星卡片分类测验(WCST)和情绪识别测验。评估精神症状。进行典型判别分析(CDA)以确定这些测量如何区分不同组,并识别潜在的症状特征。
CDA揭示了两组间具有统计学意义的缺陷特征。第一个包括冲动性、精神病态以及认知和恐惧识别方面的损伤。这表明有攻击倾向。第二个包括WCST持续性错误和面部表情处理损伤;它与攻击行为呈负相关。这些特征与精神分裂症患者的不同精神症状相关:第一个与兴奋和冲动控制不良有关;第二个与情感迟钝和运动迟缓有关。HAG组主要表现为第一种;LAG组在第一种特征上得分中等,在第二种特征上得分较高。
精神分裂症的攻击倾向以冲动性、精神病态、认知困难和恐惧识别损伤的多因素融合为特征。然而存在第二种精神病理模式可能会抑制攻击行为的表达。这些相反的模式对攻击行为的综合治疗具有重要意义。