1 Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
2 Broadmoor Hospital, West London Mental Health Trust, Crowthorne, UK.
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2017 Dec;51(12):1178-1197. doi: 10.1177/0004867417731525. Epub 2017 Oct 9.
To assess whether there are shared or divergent (a) cognitive and (b) emotion processing characteristics among violent individuals with antisocial personality disorder and/or schizophrenia, diagnoses which are commonly encountered at the interface of mental disorder and violence. Cognition and emotion processing are incorporated into models of violence, and thus an understanding of these characteristics within and between disorder groups may help inform future models and therapeutic targets.
Relevant databases (OVID, Embase, PsycINFO) were searched to identify suitable literature. Meta-analyses comparing cognitive function in violent schizophrenia and antisocial personality disorder to healthy controls were conducted. Neuropsychological studies not comparing these groups to healthy controls, and emotion processing studies, were evaluated qualitatively.
Meta-analyses indicated lower IQ, memory and executive function in both violent schizophrenia and antisocial personality disorder groups compared to healthy controls. The degree of deficit was consistently larger in violent schizophrenia. Both antisocial personality disorder and violent schizophrenia groups had difficulties in aspects of facial affect recognition, although theory of mind results were less conclusive. Psychopathic traits related positively to experiential emotion deficits across the two disorders. Very few studies explored comorbid violent schizophrenia and antisocial personality disorder despite this being common in clinical practice.
There are qualitatively similar, but quantitatively different, neuropsychological and emotion processing deficits in violent individuals with schizophrenia and antisocial personality disorder which could be developed into transdiagnostic treatment targets for violent behaviour. Future research should aim to characterise specific subgroups of violent offenders, including those with comorbid diagnoses.
评估具有反社会人格障碍和/或精神分裂症的暴力个体之间是否存在共同或不同的(a)认知和(b)情绪处理特征,这些诊断通常出现在精神障碍和暴力的交界处。认知和情绪处理被纳入暴力模型中,因此,了解这些特征在不同疾病群体之间的异同可能有助于为未来的模型和治疗目标提供信息。
检索相关数据库(OVID、Embase、PsycINFO)以确定合适的文献。对暴力精神分裂症和反社会人格障碍患者与健康对照组的认知功能进行了荟萃分析。对未与健康对照组比较这些组的神经心理学研究和情绪处理研究进行了定性评估。
荟萃分析表明,与健康对照组相比,暴力精神分裂症和反社会人格障碍组的智商、记忆力和执行功能均较低。暴力精神分裂症组的缺陷程度始终更大。反社会人格障碍和暴力精神分裂症组在面部情感识别方面均存在困难,尽管心理理论的结果不太明确。精神病特质与两种疾病的体验性情绪缺陷呈正相关。尽管在临床实践中这两种疾病很常见,但很少有研究探讨同时患有暴力性精神分裂症和反社会人格障碍的患者。
具有暴力行为的精神分裂症和反社会人格障碍患者存在相似但程度不同的神经心理学和情绪处理缺陷,这些缺陷可以发展为针对暴力行为的跨诊断治疗靶点。未来的研究应旨在描述特定的暴力犯罪亚组,包括具有合并诊断的患者。