Duke Patient Safety Center, Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 Aug;26(8):632-640. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-006032. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
Improving the resiliency of healthcare workers is a national imperative, driven in part by healthcare workers having minimal exposure to the skills and culture to achieve work-life balance (WLB). Regardless of current policies, healthcare workers feel compelled to work more and take less time to recover from work. Satisfaction with WLB has been measured, as has work-life conflict, but how frequently healthcare workers engage in specific WLB behaviours is rarely assessed. Measurement of behaviours may have advantages over measurement of perceptions; behaviours more accurately reflect WLB and can be targeted by leaders for improvement.
1. To describe a novel survey scale for evaluating work-life climate based on specific behavioural frequencies in healthcare workers.2. To evaluate the scale's psychometric properties and provide benchmarking data from a large healthcare system.3. To investigate associations between work-life climate, teamwork climate and safety climate.
Cross-sectional survey study of US healthcare workers within a large healthcare system.
7923 of 9199 eligible healthcare workers across 325 work settings within 16 hospitals completed the survey in 2009 (86% response rate). The overall work-life climate scale internal consistency was Cronbach α=0.790. t-Tests of top versus bottom quartile work settings revealed that positive work-life climate was associated with better teamwork climate, safety climate and increased participation in safety leadership WalkRounds with feedback (p<0.001). Univariate analysis of variance demonstrated differences that varied significantly in WLB between healthcare worker role, hospitals and work setting.
The work-life climate scale exhibits strong psychometric properties, elicits results that vary widely by work setting, discriminates between positive and negative workplace norms, and aligns well with other culture constructs that have been found to correlate with clinical outcomes.
提高医护人员的适应能力是当务之急,部分原因是医护人员几乎没有接触过实现工作与生活平衡(WLB)的技能和文化。尽管有现行政策,医护人员仍感到被迫增加工作时间,减少从工作中恢复的时间。人们已经衡量了对 WLB 的满意度,以及工作与生活的冲突,但很少评估医护人员从事特定 WLB 行为的频率。与衡量感知相比,衡量行为可能具有优势;行为更准确地反映 WLB,并且可以由领导者针对改进进行定位。
对一家大型医疗系统中的美国医护人员进行横断面调查研究。
2009 年,在 16 家医院的 325 个工作场所中,有 7923 名符合条件的医护人员完成了调查(86%的回应率)。总体工作与生活氛围量表的内部一致性 Cronbach α=0.790。对处于工作场所前四分之一和后四分之一的医护人员进行 t 检验,结果显示积极的工作与生活氛围与更好的团队合作氛围、安全氛围以及更多地参与带反馈的安全领导步行查房(p<0.001)有关。单因素方差分析显示,医护人员的角色、医院和工作场所之间的 WLB 存在显著差异。
工作与生活氛围量表具有很强的心理测量学特性,根据工作环境产生了广泛变化的结果,区分了积极和消极的工作场所规范,并且与已经发现与临床结果相关的其他文化结构很好地契合。