Kossek Ellen Ernst, Baltes Boris B, Matthews Russell A
Michigan State University.
Ind Organ Psychol. 2011 Sep 1;4(3):352-369. doi: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2011.01353.x.
Although work-family research has mushroomed over the past several decades, an implementation gap persists in putting work-family research into practice. Because of this, work-family researchers have not made a significant impact in improving the lives of employees relative to the amount of research that has been conducted. The goal of this article is to clarify areas where implementation gaps between work-family research and practice are prevalent, discuss the importance of reducing these gaps, and make the case that both better and different research should be conducted. We recommend several alternative but complementary actions for the work-family researcher: (a) work with organizations to study their policy and practice implementation efforts, (b) focus on the impact of rapid technological advances that are blurring work-family boundaries, (c) conduct research to empower the individual to self-manage the work-family interface, and (d) engage in advocacy and collaborative policy research to change institutional contexts and break down silos. Increased partnerships between industrial-organizational (I-O) psychology practitioners and researchers from many industries and disciplines could break down silos that we see as limiting development of the field.
尽管在过去几十年里工作与家庭的研究迅速发展,但在将工作与家庭研究付诸实践方面,仍然存在实施差距。正因如此,相对于已开展的研究数量而言,工作与家庭研究人员在改善员工生活方面并未产生重大影响。本文的目的是阐明工作与家庭研究和实践之间普遍存在实施差距的领域,讨论缩小这些差距的重要性,并论证应该开展更好且不同的研究。我们为工作与家庭研究人员推荐几种可供选择但相辅相成的行动:(a) 与组织合作,研究其政策和实践的实施情况;(b) 关注正在模糊工作与家庭界限的快速技术进步的影响;(c) 开展研究,使个人有能力自我管理工作与家庭的界面;(d) 参与宣传和合作政策研究,以改变制度环境并打破壁垒。工业组织(I-O)心理学从业者与来自许多行业和学科的研究人员之间加强合作,可以打破我们认为限制该领域发展的壁垒。