Suppr超能文献

来自手部和足部的皮肤机械感受器反馈可调节肌肉交感神经活动。

Cutaneous Mechanoreceptor Feedback from the Hand and Foot Can Modulate Muscle Sympathetic Nerve Activity.

作者信息

Strzalkowski Nicholas D J, Incognito Anthony V, Bent Leah R, Millar Philip J

机构信息

Department of Human Health and Nutritional Science, University of Guelph Guelph, ON, Canada.

Department of Human Health and Nutritional Science, University of GuelphGuelph, ON, Canada; Toronto General Research Institute, Toronto General HospitalToronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Front Neurosci. 2016 Dec 8;10:568. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2016.00568. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

Stimulation of high threshold mechanical nociceptors on the skin can modulate efferent sympathetic outflow. Whether low threshold mechanoreceptors from glabrous skin are similarly capable of modulating autonomic outflow is unclear. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the effects of cutaneous afferent feedback from the hand palm and foot sole on efferent muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA). Fifteen healthy young participants (9 male; 25 ± 3 years [range: 22-29]) underwent microneurographic recording of multi-unit MSNA from the right fibular nerve during 2 min of baseline and 2 min of mechanical vibration (150 Hz, 220 μm peak-to-peak) applied to the left hand or foot. Each participant completed three trials of both hand and foot stimulation, each separated by 5 min. MSNA burst frequency decreased similarly during the 2 min of both hand (20.8 ± 8.9 vs. 19.3 ± 8.6 bursts/minute [Δ -8%], = 0.035) and foot (21.0 ± 8.3 vs. 19.5 ± 8.3 bursts/minute [Δ -8%], = 0.048) vibration but did not alter normalized mean burst amplitude or area (All > 0.05). Larger reductions in burst frequency were observed during the first 10 s (onset) of both hand (20.8 ± 8.9 vs. 17.0 ± 10.4 [Δ -25%], < 0.001) and foot (21.0 ± 8.3 vs. 18.3 ± 9.4 [Δ -16%], = 0.035) vibration, in parallel with decreases in normalized mean burst amplitude (hand: 0.45 ± 0.06 vs. 0.36 ± 0.14% [Δ -19%], = 0.03; foot: 0.47 ± 0.07 vs. 0.34 ± 0.19% [Δ -27%], = 0.02) and normalized mean burst area (hand: 0.42 ± 0.05 vs. 0.32 ± 0.12% [Δ -25%], = 0.003; foot: 0.47 ± 0.05 vs. 0.34 ± 0.16% [Δ -28%], = 0.01). These results demonstrate that tactile feedback from the hands and feet can influence efferent sympathetic outflow to skeletal muscle.

摘要

刺激皮肤的高阈值机械性伤害感受器可调节传出性交感神经输出。来自无毛皮肤的低阈值机械感受器是否同样能够调节自主神经输出尚不清楚。因此,本研究的目的是检查来自手掌和足底的皮肤传入反馈对传出性肌肉交感神经活动(MSNA)的影响。15名健康的年轻参与者(9名男性;25±3岁[范围:22 - 29岁])在基线2分钟和对左手或左脚施加机械振动(150Hz,峰 - 峰值220μm)2分钟期间,接受了对右侧腓总神经多单位MSNA的微神经图记录。每位参与者完成了手部和足部刺激的三项试验,每次试验间隔5分钟。在手部(20.8±8.9对19.3±8.6次/分钟[Δ - 8%],P = 0.035)和足部(21.0±8.3对19.5±8.3次/分钟[Δ - 8%],P = 0.048)振动的2分钟内,MSNA爆发频率均有类似下降,但未改变标准化平均爆发幅度或面积(所有P>0.05)。在手部(20.8±8.9对17.0±10.4[Δ - 25%],P<0.001)和足部(21.0±8.3对18.3±9.4[Δ - 16%],P = 0.035)振动的最初10秒(开始)内,观察到爆发频率有更大幅度下降,同时标准化平均爆发幅度(手部:0.45±0.06对0.36±0.14%[Δ - 19%],P = 0.03;足部:0.47±0.07对0.34±0.19%[Δ - 27%],P = 0.02)和标准化平均爆发面积(手部:0.42±0.05对0.32±0.12%[Δ - 25%],P = 0.003;足部:0.47±0.05对0.34±0.16%[Δ - 28%],P = 0.01)也下降。这些结果表明,来自手和脚的触觉反馈可影响传出性交感神经向骨骼肌的输出。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d21b/5143677/e4424c71c3ed/fnins-10-00568-g0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验