Suppr超能文献

皮肤温暖,但非触觉,可在手握疲劳任务中增加肌肉交感神经活动。

Cutaneous warmth, but not touch, increases muscle sympathetic nerve activity during a muscle fatigue hand-grip task.

机构信息

Clinical Neurophysiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden.

Department of Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden.

出版信息

Exp Brain Res. 2020 Apr;238(4):1035-1042. doi: 10.1007/s00221-020-05779-x. Epub 2020 Mar 20.

Abstract

In homeostasis, somatosensory C fibre afferents are hypothesised to mediate input to the brain about interactions with external stimuli and sympathetic efference provides the output that regulates bodily functions. We aimed to test this hypothesis and whether different types of innocuous somatosensory input have differential effects. Healthy volunteers performed a muscle fatigue (hand-grip) task to exhaustion, which produces increased muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA), as measured through microneurography. Participants completed the muscle fatigue task without concurrent cutaneous sensory stimulation (control) or we applied skin warming (heat pack) as a C fibre stimulation, slow brush stroking as C and Aβ fibre stimulation, or vibration as Aβ fibre stimulation, to the participant's forearm. We also measured heart rate, the duration of the hand-grip task, and ratings of pain at the end of the task. Concurrent skin warming showed increased MSNA compared to the other conditions. Tactile stimuli (brushing, vibration) were not significantly different to the control (no intervention) condition. Warming increased the pain from the muscle contraction, whereas the tactile stimuli did not. We interpret the effect of warming on MSNA as providing relevant afferent information during muscle contraction, which needed to be counteracted via vasoconstriction to maintain homeostasis. Brushing and vibration were less homeostatically relevant stimuli for the muscle contraction and hence had no significant effect. The findings add sensory specificity to our current understanding of homeostatic regulation through somatosensory afferent and sympathetic efferent pathways.

摘要

在体内平衡中,躯体感觉 C 纤维传入纤维被假设介导与外部刺激相互作用的大脑输入,而交感传出提供调节身体功能的输出。我们旨在检验这一假设,以及不同类型的无害躯体感觉输入是否具有不同的影响。健康志愿者进行肌肉疲劳(手握)直至力竭,通过微神经记录测量产生增加的肌肉交感神经活动(MSNA)。参与者在没有同时进行皮肤感觉刺激(对照)的情况下完成肌肉疲劳任务,或者将皮肤加热(热包)应用于前臂作为 C 纤维刺激,缓慢刷动作为 C 和 Aβ 纤维刺激,或振动作为 Aβ 纤维刺激。我们还测量了心率、手握任务的持续时间以及任务结束时的疼痛评分。同时进行皮肤加热与其他条件相比显示出增加的 MSNA。触觉刺激(刷动、振动)与对照(无干预)条件没有显著差异。加热增加了肌肉收缩引起的疼痛,而触觉刺激则没有。我们将加热对 MSNA 的影响解释为在肌肉收缩期间提供相关的传入信息,需要通过血管收缩来维持体内平衡来抵消这种信息。刷动和振动对于肌肉收缩来说是不那么具有体内平衡相关性的刺激,因此没有产生显著影响。这些发现通过躯体感觉传入和交感传出途径为我们当前对体内平衡调节的理解增加了感觉特异性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d06/7181540/c762f7fbde2f/221_2020_5779_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验