• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术十年经验:从挑选病例到成为标准术式之路

Ten-year experience of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: the road from cherry-picking to standard procedure.

作者信息

Schiffmann Jonas, Haese Alexander, Boehm Katharina, Salomon Georg, Steuber Thomas, Heinzer Hans, Huland Hartwig, Graefen Markus, Karakiewicz Pierre I

机构信息

Martini Clinic, Prostate Cancer Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany -

Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Canada -

出版信息

Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2017 Feb;69(1):69-75. doi: 10.23736/S0393-2249.16.02563-7. Epub 2016 Mar 9.

DOI:10.23736/S0393-2249.16.02563-7
PMID:28009147
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) are frequently selected according to more favorable characteristics. Such patient selection might decrease according to increasing experience.

METHODS

We relied on the Martini Clinic Prostate Cancer Center database and focused on patients treated with RARP between 2004 and 2013. Differences in clinical, pathological and surgical characteristics at RARP over time (2004-2010, 2011-2012 and 2013) were assessed.

RESULTS

Overall, 1783 RARP patients were identified. Of those, 407 (22.8%), 764 (42.8%) and 612 (34.3%) were treated between 2004 and 2010, in 2011-2012 and in 2013, respectively. Unfavorable characteristics rate, such as biopsy Gleason Score ≥4+4 (8 vs. 9 vs. 15%, P<0.001), D'Amico high-risk (12 vs. 14 vs. 19%, P=0.001) and pathological Gleason score ≥4+4 (3 vs. 4 vs. 6%, P<0.001) increased over time. Pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) was more frequently performed over time (62 vs. 83 vs. 84%, P<0.001), especially in D'Amico intermediate or high-risk patients (82 vs. 94 vs. 96%, P<0.001). Lymph node yield increased over time in overall (7 vs. 9 vs. 13, P<0.001), D'Amico intermediate (6 vs. 9 vs. 12, P<0.001) and D'Amico high-risk patients (9 vs. 12 vs. 18, P<0.001). No differences in surgical margin (P=0.7) and nerve sparing rates (P=0.09) were found.

CONCLUSIONS

A clear trend towards more unfavorable tumor characteristics over time was recorded. Additionally, the rates and extent of PLND increased with increasing experience. RAR P does not represent a barrier to PLND at our institution.

摘要

背景

接受机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)的患者通常是根据更有利的特征来选择的。随着经验的增加,这种患者选择可能会减少。

方法

我们依据马丁尼诊所前列腺癌中心数据库,重点关注2004年至2013年间接受RARP治疗的患者。评估了不同时间(2004 - 2010年、2011 - 2012年和2013年)RARP患者的临床、病理和手术特征差异。

结果

总体上,共识别出1783例RARP患者。其中,分别有407例(22.8%)、764例(42.8%)和612例(34.3%)在2004年至2010年、2011 - 2012年和2013年接受治疗。不利特征发生率,如活检Gleason评分≥4 + 4(8%对9%对15%,P < 0.001)、达米科高危(12%对14%对19%,P = 0.001)和病理Gleason评分≥4 + 4(3%对4%对6%,P < 0.001)随时间增加。盆腔淋巴结清扫术(PLND)随着时间推移更频繁地进行(62%对83%对84%,P < 0.001),尤其是在达米科中危或高危患者中(82%对94%对96%,P < 0.001)。总体上、达米科中危患者和达米科高危患者的淋巴结获取数量随时间增加(分别为7个对9个对13个,P < 0.001;6个对9个对12个,P < 0.001;9个对12个对18个,P < 0.001)。在手术切缘(P = 0.7)和保留神经率(P = 0.09)方面未发现差异。

结论

记录到肿瘤特征随时间越来越不利的明显趋势。此外,PLND的发生率和范围随着经验增加而增加。在我们机构,RARP并非PLND的障碍。

相似文献

1
Ten-year experience of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: the road from cherry-picking to standard procedure.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术十年经验:从挑选病例到成为标准术式之路
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2017 Feb;69(1):69-75. doi: 10.23736/S0393-2249.16.02563-7. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
2
Differences in Patient Characteristics Among Men Choosing Open or Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy in Contemporary Practice at a European High-Volume Center.欧洲一家高手术量中心当代实践中选择开放或机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的男性患者特征差异。
Urol Int. 2016;97(1):8-15. doi: 10.1159/000443701. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
3
Assessment of lymph node yield after pelvic lymph node dissection in men with prostate cancer: a comparison between robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and open radical prostatectomy in the modern era.评估前列腺癌患者行盆腔淋巴结清扫术后的淋巴结检出量:机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术与开放根治性前列腺切除术在现代的比较。
J Endourol. 2010 Jul;24(7):1055-60. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0128.
4
Safety of selective nerve sparing in high risk prostate cancer during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中高危前列腺癌保留神经的安全性
J Robot Surg. 2017 Jun;11(2):129-138. doi: 10.1007/s11701-016-0627-3. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
5
Adherence of the indication to European Association of Urology guideline recommended pelvic lymph node dissection at a high-volume center: Differences between open and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.该适应症符合欧洲泌尿外科协会指南推荐,在高容量中心进行盆腔淋巴结清扫:开放性与机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的差异。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015 Nov;41(11):1547-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.05.008. Epub 2015 Jun 1.
6
Indication for and extension of pelvic lymph node dissection during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: an analysis of five European institutions.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术时盆腔淋巴结清扫的适应证和范围:来自五家欧洲机构的分析。
Eur Urol. 2014 Oct;66(4):635-43. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.12.059. Epub 2014 Jan 4.
7
[High-risk prostate cancer surgical margins during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy].机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中的高危前列腺癌手术切缘
Prog Urol. 2015 Jun;25(7):390-5. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2015.02.003. Epub 2015 Mar 7.
8
The impact of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy on the use and extent of pelvic lymph node dissection in the "post-dissemination" period.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术对“播散后”时期盆腔淋巴结清扫术的应用及范围的影响
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2014 Sep;40(9):1080-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.12.016. Epub 2014 Jan 2.
9
Multicenter evaluation of guideline adherence for pelvic lymph node dissection in patients undergoing open retropubic vs. laparoscopic or robot assisted radical prostatectomy according to the recent German S3 guideline on prostate cancer.根据最近德国前列腺癌 S3 指南,对接受开腹经耻骨后与腹腔镜或机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的患者进行盆腔淋巴结清扫的指南依从性进行多中心评估。
World J Urol. 2018 Jun;36(6):855-861. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2195-9. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
10
Rate of Symptomatic Lymphocele Formation After Extraperitoneal vs Transperitoneal Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy and Bilateral Pelvic Lymphadenectomy.腹膜外与经腹机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术及双侧盆腔淋巴结清扫术后有症状性淋巴囊肿形成的发生率。
J Endourol. 2017 Oct;31(10):1037-1043. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0153. Epub 2017 Aug 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Changing times: trends in risk classification, tumor upstaging, and positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy - results from a contemporary National Cancer Database study.时代变迁:根治性前列腺切除术后风险分类、肿瘤升级和阳性切缘的趋势——来自当代国家癌症数据库研究的结果。
World J Urol. 2024 Sep 30;42(1):551. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05262-0.
2
Changing trends in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Inverse stage migration-A retrospective analysis.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的变化趋势:逆向分期迁移——一项回顾性分析。
Prostate Int. 2021 Sep;9(3):157-162. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2021.04.002. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
3
Comparison of intra- and postoperative analgesia and pain perception in robot-assisted vs. open radical prostatectomy.
机器人辅助与开放性根治性前列腺切除术的术中及术后镇痛和疼痛感知比较。
World J Urol. 2020 Jun;38(6):1451-1457. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02938-w. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
4
Is Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy associated with better functional and oncological outcomes? Literature review and meta-analysis.保留Retzius间隙的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术是否与更好的功能和肿瘤学结果相关?文献综述与荟萃分析。
Asian J Urol. 2019 Apr;6(2):174-182. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2018.02.001. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
5
Supra-pubic versus urethral catheter after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: systematic review of current evidence.耻骨上与尿道导尿管在后机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术:当前证据的系统评价。
World J Urol. 2018 Sep;36(9):1365-1372. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2275-x. Epub 2018 Mar 29.
6
Development and validation of 3D printed virtual models for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and partial nephrectomy: urologists' and patients' perception.3D 打印虚拟模型在机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术和部分肾切除术的开发和验证:泌尿科医生和患者的感知。
World J Urol. 2018 Feb;36(2):201-207. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2126-1. Epub 2017 Nov 10.