Aaltonen Kalle, Heinonen Arto, Joensuu Jaana, Parmanne Pinja, Karjalainen Anna, Varjolahti-Lehtinen Tuire, Uutela Toini, Puurtinen-Vilkki Maija, Arstila Leena, Blom Marja, Sokka Tuulikki, Nordström Dan
Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 56, 00014 Helsinki, Finland.
Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 56, 00014 Helsinki, Finland.
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2017 Jun;46(6):732-739. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2016.09.005. Epub 2016 Sep 16.
Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-inhibitors are used to treat psoriatic arthritis (PsA), but only a limited number of observational studies on this subject have been published thus far. The aim of this research was to analyze the effectiveness and drug survival of TNF-inhibitors in the treatment of PsA.
PsA patients identified from the National Register for Biologic Treatment in Finland (ROB-FIN) starting their first, second, or third TNF-inhibitor treatment between 2004 and 2014 were included. Effectiveness was measured using ACR and EULAR response criteria and modeled using ordinal logistic regression. Treatment persistence was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards model.
The study comprised 765 patients and 990 TNF-inhibitor treatment courses. EULAR moderate treatment responses at 6 months were achieved by 68% and 37% of the users of the first and the second or the third biologic, respectively. The probabilities of discontinuing the treatment within 12 and 24 months were 20% and 28%, respectively. Adjusted treatment responses to all TNF-inhibitors were similar; however, co-therapy with conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) was not associated with better effectiveness. Adalimumab [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.62; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.44-0.88] was superior to infliximab in drug survival while etanercept (HR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.55-1.1) and golimumab (HR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.46-1.2) did not differ from it. Co-medication with csDMARDs did not statistically improve drug survival.
All available TNF-inhibitors showed similar treatment responses with or without csDMARDs. Adalimumab was associated with better drug survival when compared to infliximab.
肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)抑制剂用于治疗银屑病关节炎(PsA),但迄今为止,关于该主题的观察性研究数量有限。本研究的目的是分析TNF抑制剂治疗PsA的有效性和药物留存率。
纳入2004年至2014年间在芬兰国家生物治疗登记处(ROB-FIN)开始首次使用TNF抑制剂治疗、第二次使用TNF抑制剂治疗或第三次使用TNF抑制剂治疗的PsA患者。使用美国风湿病学会(ACR)和欧洲抗风湿病联盟(EULAR)反应标准衡量有效性,并使用有序逻辑回归进行建模。使用Kaplan-Meier生存分析和Cox比例风险模型分析治疗持续性。
该研究包括765例患者和990个TNF抑制剂治疗疗程。首次使用生物制剂和第二次或第三次使用生物制剂的患者中,分别有68%和37%在6个月时达到EULAR中度治疗反应。在12个月和24个月内停止治疗的概率分别为20%和28%。对所有TNF抑制剂的调整后治疗反应相似;然而,与传统合成改善病情抗风湿药(csDMARDs)联合治疗并未带来更好的有效性。在药物留存率方面,阿达木单抗[风险比(HR)=0.62;95%置信区间(CI):0.44-0.88]优于英夫利昔单抗,而依那西普(HR = 0.77,95% CI:0.55-1.1)和戈利木单抗(HR = 0.75,95% CI:0.46-1.2)与阿达木单抗无差异。与csDMARDs联合用药在统计学上并未改善药物留存率。
所有可用的TNF抑制剂无论是否与csDMARDs联合使用,均显示出相似的治疗反应。与英夫利昔单抗相比,阿达木单抗的药物留存率更高。