Suppr超能文献

在接受 b/tsDMARD 单药治疗与联合甲氨蝶呤治疗的 PsA 患者中,临床参数和药物保留方面无差异:来自 RABBIT-SpA 登记处的数据。

No difference in clinical parameters and drug retention in PsA patients receiving b/tsDMARD monotherapy versus combination with methotrexate: data from the RABBIT-SpA registry.

机构信息

Epidemiology Unit, German Rheumatism Research Center Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Herne, Germany.

出版信息

RMD Open. 2024 Jul 23;10(3):e004389. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2024-004389.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The potential benefit of methotrexate (MTX) in combination with biologic (b) and targeted synthetic (ts) disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is still a matter of debate.

OBJECTIVES

To compare clinical and patient reported characteristics as well as drug retention rates in PsA patients receiving b/tsDMARD monotherapy or in combination with MTX.

METHODS

RABBIT-SpA is a prospective longitudinal cohort study including axSpA and PsA patients. In this analysis, PsA patients were stratified into two groups: starting b/tsDMARD as monotherapy or in combination with MTX. Treatment retention was compared by drug survival analysis.

RESULTS

69% of the patients (n=900) started b/tsDMARD as monotherapy while 31% were treated in combination with MTX (n=405). At baseline, clinical domains like skin, nail and joint affection, dactylitis, enthesitis and axial involvement were similar between the groups. Only the patients' satisfaction concerning tolerability of the previous treatment was significantly better in the combination group at treatment start. Drug retention rates did not differ between the groups (p=0.4). At 6/12 months, 66%/48% of patients in monotherapy and 67%/48% in the combination group were still on their original treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

We did not identify any clinical parameters with notable influence on the choice of b/tsDMARD mono or MTX-combination therapy in PsA. Drug retention rates are similar between mono and combination therapy. It seems that the decision to continue MTX at initiation of b/tsDMARDs is mostly based on the subjective tolerability of MTX treatment.

摘要

背景

甲氨蝶呤(MTX)联合生物制剂(b)和靶向合成(ts)改善病情抗风湿药物(DMARDs)在银屑病关节炎(PsA)中的潜在益处仍存在争议。

目的

比较接受 b/tsDMARD 单药或联合 MTX 治疗的 PsA 患者的临床和患者报告特征以及药物保留率。

方法

RABBIT-SpA 是一项前瞻性纵向队列研究,包括 axSpA 和 PsA 患者。在这项分析中,将 PsA 患者分为两组:开始 b/tsDMARD 单药或联合 MTX 治疗。通过药物生存分析比较治疗保留率。

结果

69%(n=900)的患者开始 b/tsDMARD 单药治疗,31%(n=405)联合 MTX 治疗。基线时,皮肤、指甲和关节受累、指炎、附着点炎和轴性受累等临床领域在两组之间相似。只有在开始治疗时,联合组患者对先前治疗的耐受性的满意度显著更高。两组之间的药物保留率没有差异(p=0.4)。在 6/12 个月时,单药组和联合组分别有 66%/48%和 67%/48%的患者仍在接受原治疗。

结论

我们没有发现任何对 PsA 中 b/tsDMARD 单药或 MTX 联合治疗选择有明显影响的临床参数。单药和联合治疗的药物保留率相似。似乎在开始 b/tsDMARDs 时继续使用 MTX 的决定主要基于 MTX 治疗的主观耐受性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aded/11268072/30d66c9c3776/rmdopen-10-3-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验