Iannone F, Lopriore S, Bucci R, Scioscia C, Anelli M G, Notarnicola A, Lapadula G
Rheumatology Unit, Medical School, University of Bari , Foggia , Italy.
Scand J Rheumatol. 2015 May;44(3):192-9. doi: 10.3109/03009742.2014.962081. Epub 2015 Jan 7.
To evaluate the 2-year drug survival rates of the tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α blockers adalimumab, etanercept, and infliximab in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients with either oligoarticular (oligo-PsA) or polyarticular PsA (poly-PsA).
We studied a prospective cohort of 328 PsA patients with peripheral arthritis (213 with poly-PsA and 115 with oligo-PsA), beginning their first ever anti-TNF-α treatment with adalimumab, etanercept, or infliximab. The aim of the study was to evaluate the drug survival rates and possible baseline predictors at 2 years.
After 24 months, persistence in therapy with the first anti-TNF-α blocker was not statistically different in the oligo-PsA (70.4%) and poly-PsA (65.7%) subsets. Predictors of drug discontinuation were female sex [hazard ratio (HR) 1.63, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.00-2.68, p = 0.04] and starting the therapy in years 2003-8 (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.33-0.80, p = 0.003). In poly-PsA, the persistence of etanercept (68.3%) was significantly higher than that of adalimumab (51.9%, p = 0.01), whereas in oligo-PsA no significant difference was detected. In poly-PsA, the period 2003-8 was a negative predictor (HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.21-0.62, p = 0.0001) whereas in oligo-PsA female gender was a positive predictor of drug discontinuation (HR 2.08, 95% CI 1.02-4.24, p = 0.04). With regard to clinical outcomes, the best responses in terms of European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) 'good' response or Disease Activity Score (DAS28) remission, crude or adjusted according to the LUND Efficacy indeX (LUNDEX), were seen in patients on etanercept or infliximab.
Our study provides some evidence that anti-TNF-α drugs may perform differently in PsA, and that the analysis of clinical disease subsets may improve our knowledge and promote better management of PsA.
评估肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)-α抑制剂阿达木单抗、依那西普和英夫利昔单抗在少关节型银屑病关节炎(oligo-PsA)或多关节型银屑病关节炎(poly-PsA)患者中的2年药物留存率。
我们对328例患有外周关节炎的银屑病关节炎患者(213例多关节型银屑病关节炎患者和115例少关节型银屑病关节炎患者)进行了一项前瞻性队列研究,这些患者开始首次使用阿达木单抗、依那西普或英夫利昔单抗进行抗TNF-α治疗。该研究的目的是评估2年时的药物留存率及可能的基线预测因素。
24个月后,少关节型银屑病关节炎亚组(70.4%)和多关节型银屑病关节炎亚组(65.7%)中首次使用抗TNF-α抑制剂持续治疗的情况在统计学上无差异。停药的预测因素为女性(风险比[HR]1.63,95%置信区间[CI]1.00 - 2.68,p = 0.04)以及在2003 - 2008年开始治疗(HR 0.51,95%CI 0.33 - 0.80,p = 0.003)。在多关节型银屑病关节炎中,依那西普的留存率(68.3%)显著高于阿达木单抗(51.9%,p = 0.01),而在少关节型银屑病关节炎中未检测到显著差异。在多关节型银屑病关节炎中,2003 - 2008年是一个负性预测因素(HR 0.36, 95%CI 0.21 - 0.62, p = 0.0001),而在少关节型银屑病关节炎中女性性别是停药的正性预测因素(HR 2.08, 95%CI 1.02 - 4.24, p = 0.04)。关于临床结局,在接受依那西普或英夫利昔单抗治疗的患者中,根据欧洲抗风湿病联盟(EULAR)“良好”反应或疾病活动评分(DAS28)缓解情况(粗率或根据隆德疗效指数[LUNDEX]调整后)观察到最佳反应。
我们的研究提供了一些证据,表明抗TNF-α药物在银屑病关节炎中的表现可能不同,并且对临床疾病亚组的分析可能会增进我们的认识并促进对银屑病关节炎的更好管理。