Schiff Michael H, Sadowski Peter
Division of Rheumatology, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA.
Antares Pharma Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Rheumatol Int. 2017 Feb;37(2):213-218. doi: 10.1007/s00296-016-3621-1. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
Both the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) guidelines recommend the use of methotrexate (MTX) for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) when there is no contraindication. While MTX is the foundation of RA therapy (Singh et al. in Arthritis Care Res 64:625-639,2012), absorption saturation compromises its oral bioavailability (BA). Differences in the relative BA of oral versus subcutaneous (SC) MTX demonstrate the need for guidance on successful dose-conversion strategies. This study was designed to compare MTX PK profiles as a result of MTX administration via three different treatment administrations: oral, SC MTX administered via an auto-injector (MTXAI) into the abdomen (MTXAI) and into the thigh (MTXAI). In this paper, we establish a dose-conversion method based on the BA of MTX from oral and SC administration. SC administration provided higher exposure of MTX than the same dose given orally. Unlike the exposure limitations of oral MTX, dose-proportional exposure was seen with SC MTX.
美国风湿病学会(ACR)和欧洲抗风湿病联盟(EULAR)的指南均建议,在无禁忌证的情况下,使用甲氨蝶呤(MTX)治疗类风湿关节炎(RA)。虽然MTX是RA治疗的基础(Singh等人,《关节炎护理与研究》64:625 - 639,2012年),但其吸收饱和会影响口服生物利用度(BA)。口服与皮下(SC)MTX相对BA的差异表明,需要有关成功剂量转换策略的指导。本研究旨在比较通过三种不同给药方式给予MTX后的药代动力学(PK)特征:口服、通过自动注射器(MTXAI)将SC MTX注入腹部(MTXAI)和注入大腿(MTXAI)。在本文中,我们基于口服和SC给药的MTX的BA建立了一种剂量转换方法。SC给药比相同剂量的口服给药使MTX的暴露量更高。与口服MTX的暴露限制不同,SC MTX呈现剂量比例性暴露。