Kelly K E, Whitaker J, Petty A, Widmer C, Dybwad A, Sleeth D, Martin R, Butterfield A
University of Utah, Department of Chemical Engineering, 3290 MEB, 50 S. Central Campus Dr., Salt Lake City, UT, United States.
University of Utah, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 2110 MEB, 50 S. Central Campus Dr., Salt Lake City, UT, United States.
Environ Pollut. 2017 Feb;221:491-500. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.12.039. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
Low-cost, light-scattering-based particulate matter (PM) sensors are becoming more widely available and are being increasingly deployed in ambient and indoor environments because of their low cost and ability to provide high spatial and temporal resolution PM information. Researchers have begun to evaluate some of these sensors under laboratory and environmental conditions. In this study, a low-cost, particulate matter sensor (Plantower PMS 1003/3003) used by a community air-quality network is evaluated in a controlled wind-tunnel environment and in the ambient environment during several winter-time, cold-pool events that are associated with high ambient levels of PM. In the wind-tunnel, the PMS sensor performance is compared to two research-grade, light-scattering instruments, and in the ambient tests, the sensor performance is compared to two federal equivalent (one tapered element oscillating microbalance and one beta attenuation monitor) and gravimetric federal reference methods (FEMs/FRMs) as well as one research-grade instrument (GRIMM). The PMS sensor response correlates well with research-grade instruments in the wind-tunnel tests, and its response is linear over the concentration range tested (200-850 μg/m). In the ambient tests, this PM sensor correlates better with gravimetric methods than previous studies with correlation coefficients of 0.88. However additional measurements under a variety of ambient conditions are needed. Although the PMS sensor correlated as well as the research-grade instrument to the FRM/FEMs in ambient conditions, its response varies with particle properties to a much greater degree than the research-grade instrument. In addition, the PMS sensors overestimate ambient PM concentrations and begin to exhibit a non-linear response when PM concentrations exceed 40 μg/m. These results have important implications for communicating results from low-cost sensor networks, and they highlight the importance of using an appropriate correction factor for the target environmental conditions if the user wants to compare the results to FEM/FRMs.
低成本、基于光散射的颗粒物(PM)传感器正变得越来越普及,由于其成本低且能够提供高空间和时间分辨率的PM信息,它们在环境和室内环境中的部署也越来越多。研究人员已开始在实验室和环境条件下对其中一些传感器进行评估。在本研究中,对一个社区空气质量网络使用的低成本颗粒物传感器(Plantower PMS 1003/3003)在可控风洞环境以及几个冬季与高环境PM水平相关的冷池事件期间的环境中进行了评估。在风洞中,将PMS传感器的性能与两台研究级光散射仪器进行了比较,在环境测试中,将该传感器的性能与两种联邦等效方法(一台锥形元件振荡微天平以及一台β衰减监测仪)和重量法联邦参考方法(FEMs/FRMs)以及一台研究级仪器(GRIMM)进行了比较。在风洞测试中,PMS传感器的响应与研究级仪器具有良好的相关性,并且在测试的浓度范围内(200 - 850μg/m)其响应呈线性。在环境测试中,该PM传感器与重量法的相关性比之前的研究更好,相关系数为0.88。然而,需要在各种环境条件下进行额外测量。尽管在环境条件下PMS传感器与研究级仪器与FRM/FEMs的相关性相同,但其响应随颗粒特性的变化程度比研究级仪器大得多。此外,PMS传感器高估了环境PM浓度,并且当PM浓度超过40μg/m时开始表现出非线性响应。这些结果对于传达低成本传感器网络的结果具有重要意义,并且它们强调了如果用户想要将结果与FEM/FRMs进行比较,针对目标环境条件使用适当校正因子的重要性。