Greenlund Laura J S, Merry Stephen P, Thacher Tom D, Ward William J
Division of Primary Care Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.
Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.
Am J Med. 2017 May;130(5):e191-e193. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2016.11.040. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
Primary care providers often manage skin abscesses in the outpatient setting. Estimating the size and depth of an abscess, and distinguishing abscess from cellulitis by clinical examination can be challenging due to surrounding firm tissue induration. Definitive treatment of abscess requires incision and drainage, and the approach chosen may be altered by abscess size, depth, and surrounding neurovascular structures.
For 31 consecutive patients seen in the primary care outpatient clinic, we prospectively compared the estimated size of skin abscesses by clinical examination with that determined by ultrasound. Prior to incision and drainage, a limited point-of-care ultrasound examination was performed and the abscess dimensions were measured, the depth was determined, and adjacent vascular structures were noted. Based on ultrasound findings, physicians reported whether the decision to perform the procedure or the techniques used to perform the procedure were altered by the scan.
The clinical examination was inaccurate for size estimation by >0.5 cm in 16 of 31 patients (52%). Ultrasound examination changed the physician decision of whether or not incision and drainage should be performed in 7 patients (23%) and altered the technique/approach in an additional 10 patients (32%); thus, management was changed in 55% of cases. Physician confidence in performing the procedure was improved in 16 cases (52%).
Outpatient procedural management of skin abscesses by primary care physicians was altered in more than half the cases by performing point-of-care ultrasound prior to incision and drainage.
基层医疗服务提供者常在门诊处理皮肤脓肿。由于周围组织硬结,通过临床检查估计脓肿的大小和深度以及区分脓肿和蜂窝织炎具有挑战性。脓肿的明确治疗需要切开引流,而选择的方法可能会因脓肿的大小、深度及周围神经血管结构而改变。
对于在基层医疗门诊连续就诊的31例患者,我们前瞻性地比较了通过临床检查估计的皮肤脓肿大小与超声测定的大小。在切开引流前,进行了有限的即时超声检查,测量脓肿尺寸,确定深度,并记录相邻血管结构。根据超声检查结果,医生报告扫描是否改变了进行该操作的决定或操作所使用的技术。
31例患者中有16例(52%)临床检查对大小的估计误差>0.5 cm。超声检查改变了7例患者(23%)是否进行切开引流的医生决定,并在另外10例患者(32%)中改变了技术/方法;因此,55%的病例管理方式发生了改变。16例(52%)医生进行该操作的信心得到了提高。
在超过半数的病例中,基层医疗医生在切开引流前进行即时超声检查改变了皮肤脓肿的门诊手术管理方式。