Suppr超能文献

一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、交叉试验,评估鼻内胰岛素对难治性重度抑郁症患者认知和情绪的影响。

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial evaluating the effect of intranasal insulin on cognition and mood in individuals with treatment-resistant major depressive disorder.

作者信息

Cha Danielle S, Best Michael W, Bowie Christopher R, Gallaugher Laura Ashley, Woldeyohannes Hanna O, Soczynska Joanna K, Lewis Gary, MacQueen Glenda, Sahakian Barbara J, Kennedy Sidney H, Lui Jane P, Mansur Rodrigo B, McIntyre Roger S

机构信息

Mood Disorders Psychopharmacology Unit, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Cognitive and Psychotic Disorders Lab, Department of Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 2017 Mar 1;210:57-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.12.006. Epub 2016 Dec 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cognitive dysfunction in major depressive disorder (MDD) is identified as a primary therapeutic target; no current treatment is approved for the treatment of cognitive dysfunction in MDD. We examined whether intranasal insulin offered a beneficial effect across measures of cognitive function in adults with MDD.

METHODS

Thirty-five adults (18-65 years of age: 47.09±9.89) meeting criteria for a major depressive episode as per the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM)-IV-Treatment Revised were included in this randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled, crossover design study. Subjects were not stratified based on baseline cognitive deficit. Subjects were randomized to 4 weeks of either intranasal insulin 40 International Units (IU) taken four times a day (i.e., morning, afternoon, evening, and before bed) (QID) (n=19) or placebo (n=16).

RESULTS

No between group differences were observed in change from baseline on total Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score (25.98±2.81), in either of the Positive or Negative subscales of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS), or on a global index of neurocognition. The possibility of practice and/or carry over effect could not be excluded. Methodological refinement (e.g., stratification of subjects based on baseline cognitive deficit) may have augmented assay sensitivity.

CONCLUSION

Intranasal insulin did not demonstrate statistically significant improvements on overall mood, aspects of emotional processing, neurocognitive function, or self-reported quality of life patient reported outcomes.

摘要

背景

重度抑郁症(MDD)中的认知功能障碍被确定为主要治疗靶点;目前尚无获批用于治疗MDD认知功能障碍的疗法。我们研究了鼻内胰岛素对患有MDD的成年人的各项认知功能指标是否具有有益作用。

方法

本随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、交叉设计研究纳入了35名年龄在18至65岁之间(47.09±9.89)、符合《诊断与统计手册》(DSM)-IV-修订版治疗标准的重度抑郁发作患者。受试者未根据基线认知缺陷进行分层。受试者被随机分为两组,一组接受为期4周的鼻内胰岛素治疗,每天四次,每次40国际单位(IU)(即早上、下午、晚上和睡前)(每日四次)(n = 19),另一组接受安慰剂治疗(n = 16)。

结果

在蒙哥马利-艾斯伯格抑郁评定量表(MADRS)总分(25.98±2.81)、正负性情绪量表(PANAS)的正性或负性子量表以及神经认知综合指标方面,两组从基线开始的变化均未观察到组间差异。无法排除练习和/或遗留效应的可能性。方法学的改进(例如,根据基线认知缺陷对受试者进行分层)可能会提高检测灵敏度。

结论

鼻内胰岛素在总体情绪、情绪加工方面、神经认知功能或患者报告的自我报告生活质量结局方面未显示出统计学上的显著改善。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验