Takeda Toshinobu, Tsuji Yui, Kanazawa Junichiro, Sakai Takanobu, Weiss Margaret D
Department of Clinical Psychology, Ryukoku University, 125-1 Daiku-cho, Oomiya-higashi-iru, Shichijyo-dori, Shimogyo-ku, Kyoto, 600-8268, Japan.
School of Psychological Science, Health Sciences University of Hokkaido, Sapporo, Japan.
Atten Defic Hyperact Disord. 2017 Sep;9(3):169-177. doi: 10.1007/s12402-016-0213-6. Epub 2016 Dec 24.
The Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale Self-Report has been translated into nine languages and has been widely used in assessing functional impairment of adults with ADHD. This study is a psychometric validation of the WFIRS-S in Japanese. The WFIRS-S-J and other questionnaires were administered to 46 adults with attention-deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), 104 control adults, and 889 university students. ADHD diagnoses were made using the Japanese semi-structured diagnostic interview for adult ADHD, which is compatible with the DSM-5. All subscales of the WFIRS-S-J had Cronbach's α values of around 0.80. Total scores on the WFIRS-S-J had high test-retest reliability after a 2-week interval. The total score, subscale scores, and 59 of the individual item scores of the 70 items in the WFIRS-S-J were significantly higher in the ADHD group than in the other two groups, although more than half of the items in subdomain G (risk) showed floor effects and did not reach significance. Generally WFIRS-S-J subdomain scores were moderately correlated with scores on the Japanese version of Conners' Adult ADHD Rating Scales Self-Report subscales. WFIRS-S-J scores were also correlated (albeit more weakly; 0.31 ≤ r ≤ 0.55) with Beck Depression Inventory II total scores. The WFIRS-S-J showed acceptable psychometric properties, although further study is necessary.
《韦斯功能损害评定量表自评版》已被翻译成九种语言，并广泛应用于评估成人注意力缺陷多动障碍（ADHD）的功能损害。本研究是对日语版WFIRS-S的心理测量学验证。对46名患有注意力缺陷多动障碍（ADHD）的成年人、104名对照成年人和889名大学生进行了WFIRS-S-J及其他问卷的施测。使用与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版兼容的日本成人ADHD半结构化诊断访谈进行ADHD诊断。WFIRS-S-J的所有子量表的克朗巴赫α值均在0.80左右。间隔2周后，WFIRS-S-J的总分具有较高的重测信度。WFIRS-S-J的总分、子量表分数以及70个项目中的59个单项分数在ADHD组中显著高于其他两组，尽管子领域G（风险）中超过一半的项目显示出地板效应且未达到显著水平。总体而言，WFIRS-S-J子领域分数与日语版《康纳斯成人ADHD评定量表自评版》子量表分数中度相关。WFIRS-S-J分数也与贝克抑郁量表第二版总分相关（尽管相关性较弱；0.31≤r≤0.55）。尽管有必要进一步研究，但WFIRS-S-J显示出可接受的心理测量学特性。
