Reinharz S
Department of Sociology, Brandeis University.
Am J Community Psychol. 1989 Jun;17(3):391-6. doi: 10.1007/BF00931048.
Three approaches are presented in this commentary on ethical conflicts in the practice of community psychology. The first is the prevention of such conflicts, in contrast with ways in which conflicts can be coped with or resolved. The second is a re-examination of the roles of the community psychologist, and of how a modification of these roles could reduce the likelihood that ethical conflicts would arise. And, finally, a more general problem is pointed out concerning the fact that communities do not generate funds sufficient to meet the needs of their citizens. Community psychologists are drawn into ethical conflicts revolving around the allocation of funds if and when these conditions prevail.
本评论针对社区心理学实践中的伦理冲突提出了三种方法。第一种是预防此类冲突，这与应对或解决冲突的方式形成对比。第二种是重新审视社区心理学家的角色，以及这些角色的改变如何能够降低伦理冲突发生的可能性。最后，指出了一个更普遍的问题，即社区没有产生足够的资金来满足其公民的需求。如果这些情况普遍存在，社区心理学家就会陷入围绕资金分配的伦理冲突之中。
