• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

构建一个用于界定和解决保护参与初级预防项目社区中伦理问题的框架。

Toward a framework for defining and resolving ethical issues in the protection of communities involved in primary prevention projects.

作者信息

Trickett Edison J

出版信息

Ethics Behav. 1998;8(4):321-37. doi: 10.1207/s15327019eb0804_5.

DOI:10.1207/s15327019eb0804_5
PMID:11660541
Abstract

Ethical issues flow from and are embedded in contexts of practice. Contexts of practice refer to the diverse social settings where interventions occur. Primary prevention activities require new professional roles in these diverse social settings. These new roles engage the professional in new activities, which in turn allow new ethical issues to arise. This article takes an ecological perspective on ethical issues arising from the enactment of new preventive roles intended to affect groups or communities. Within this perspective, the concepts of context and culture take on special conceptual significance. Four ecological assumptions about preventive interventions intended to affect groups or communities are offered as a means of framing ethical issues in such interventions. Finally, several approaches to developing ecological knowledge about the contexts of practice are presented as ways of furthering our ability to conceptualize and cope with ethical issues in preventive interventions intended to affect groups or communities.

摘要

伦理问题源于实践背景并嵌入其中。实践背景指的是干预措施发生的各种社会环境。初级预防活动在这些多样的社会环境中需要新的专业角色。这些新角色使专业人员参与新的活动,进而引发新的伦理问题。本文从生态视角探讨因旨在影响群体或社区的新预防角色的设定而产生的伦理问题。在此视角下,背景和文化的概念具有特殊的概念意义。提出了关于旨在影响群体或社区的预防干预措施的四个生态假设,作为界定此类干预措施中伦理问题的一种方式。最后,介绍了几种发展关于实践背景的生态知识的方法,作为增强我们在旨在影响群体或社区的预防干预措施中概念化和应对伦理问题能力的途径。

相似文献

1
Toward a framework for defining and resolving ethical issues in the protection of communities involved in primary prevention projects.构建一个用于界定和解决保护参与初级预防项目社区中伦理问题的框架。
Ethics Behav. 1998;8(4):321-37. doi: 10.1207/s15327019eb0804_5.
2
Prevention ethics: explicating the context of prevention activities.预防伦理学:阐释预防活动的背景
Ethics Behav. 1992;2(2):91-100. doi: 10.1207/s15327019eb0202_2.
3
SAMHSA philosophy and statement on ethical principles.药物滥用和精神健康服务管理局关于伦理原则的理念与声明。
Ethics Behav. 1998;8(4):339-43. doi: 10.1207/s15327019eb0804_6.
4
Ethical problems in research on risky behaviors and risky populations.针对危险行为和危险人群的研究中的伦理问题。
Ethics Behav. 1994;4(2):147-55. doi: 10.1207/s15327019eb0402_7.
5
Reporting and referring research participants: ethical challenges for investigators studying children and youth.报告和转介研究参与者:研究儿童和青少年的调查人员面临的伦理挑战。
Ethics Behav. 1994;4(2):87-95. doi: 10.1207/s15327019eb0402_2.
6
Participant protection with the use of records: ethical issues and recommendations.使用记录时的参与者保护:伦理问题与建议。
Ethics Behav. 1998;8(4):305-19. doi: 10.1207/s15327019eb0804_4.
7
Ethical issues in psychosocial interventions research involving controls.涉及对照组的心理社会干预研究中的伦理问题。
Ethics Behav. 2002;12(1):87-101. doi: 10.1207/S15327019EB1201_6.
8
The emerging relationship of psychology and the Internet: proposed guidelines for conducting Internet intervention research.心理学与互联网的新兴关系:开展互联网干预研究的建议指南
Ethics Behav. 1998;8(1):19-35. doi: 10.1207/s15327019eb0801_2.
9
Participatory action research: considerations for ethical review.参与式行动研究:伦理审查的考量
Soc Sci Med. 2005 May;60(10):2333-40. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.10.004. Epub 2004 Dec 19.
10
Ethical and Legal Issues in AIDS Research Joni N. Gray, Phillip M. Lyons, and Gary B. Melton.
J Leg Med. 1996 Mar;17(1):177-82. doi: 10.1080/01947649609511004.

引用本文的文献

1
Ethical Challenges in Promoting the Implementation of Preventive Interventions: Report of the SPR Task Force.促进预防干预措施实施的伦理挑战:SPR 工作组的报告。
Prev Sci. 2018 Oct;19(7):853-865. doi: 10.1007/s11121-018-0912-7.
2
Experiences with Recruitment of Marginalized Groups in a Danish Health Promotion Program: A Document Evaluation Study.丹麦健康促进项目中招募边缘化群体的经验:一项文献评估研究
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 23;11(6):e0158079. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158079. eCollection 2016.
3
Creating Mechanisms for Meaningful Collaboration Between Members of Urban Communities and University-Based HIV Prevention Researchers.
创建城市社区成员与大学艾滋病预防研究人员之间有意义合作的机制。
Soc Work Ment Health. 2007 Jan 1;5(1-2). doi: 10.1300/J200v05n01_07.
4
A typology of practice narratives during the implementation of a preventive, community intervention trial.实施预防、社区干预试验过程中的实践叙事类型学。
Implement Sci. 2009 Dec 14;4:80. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-80.
5
An HIV prevention protocol reviewed at 15 national sites: how do ethics committees protect communities?一项在15个国家站点进行审查的HIV预防方案:伦理委员会如何保护社区?
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2008 Jun;3(2):77-86. doi: 10.1525/jer.2008.3.2.77.
6
Promoting a social justice approach to prevention: future directions for training, practice, and research.推动采用社会正义方法进行预防:培训、实践和研究的未来方向。
J Prim Prev. 2009 Jan;30(1):75-87. doi: 10.1007/s10935-008-0165-5. Epub 2008 Dec 19.
7
Ecological theory in practice: illustrations from a community-based intervention to promote the health of recent mothers.实践中的生态理论:基于社区的促进初为人母者健康干预措施实例
Prev Sci. 2005 Sep;6(3):227-36. doi: 10.1007/s11121-005-0008-z.
8
Methods for exploring implementation variation and local context within a cluster randomised community intervention trial.在整群随机社区干预试验中探索实施差异和当地背景的方法。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004 Sep;58(9):788-93. doi: 10.1136/jech.2003.014415.