Yip Benjamin Hon Kei, Leonard Helen, Stock Sarah, Stoltenberg Camilla, Francis Richard W, Gissler Mika, Gross Raz, Schendel Diana, Sandin Sven
Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Telethon Kids Institute.
Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Apr 1;46(2):429-439. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyw336.
The positive association between caesarean section (CS) and autism spectrum disorder (ASD) may be attributed to preterm delivery. However, due to lack of statistical power, no previous study thoroughly examined this association across gestational age. Moreover, most studies did not differentiate between emergency and planned CS.
Using population-based registries of four Nordic countries and Western Australia, our study population included 4 987 390 singletons surviving their first year of life, which included 671 646 CS deliveries and 31 073 ASD children. We used logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (OR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) for CS, adjusted for gestational age, site, maternal age and birth year. Stratified analyses were conducted by both gestational age subgroups and by week of gestation. We compared emergency versus planned CS to investigate their potential difference in the risk of ASD.
Compared with vaginal delivery, the overall adjusted OR for ASD in CS delivery was 1.26 (95% CI 1.22-1.30). Stratified ORs were 1.25 (1.15-1.37), 1.16 (1.09-1.23), 1.34 (1.28-1.40) and 1.17 (1.04-1.30) for subgroups of gestational weeks 26-36, 37-38, 39-41 and 42-44, respectively. CS was significantly associated with risk of ASD for each week of gestation, from week 36 to 42, consistently across study sites (OR ranged 1.16-1.38). There was no statistically significant difference between emergency and planned CS in the risk of ASD.
Across the five countries, emergency or planned CS is consistently associated with a modest increased risk of ASD from gestational weeks 36 to 42 when compared with vaginal delivery.
剖宫产(CS)与自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)之间的正相关可能归因于早产。然而,由于缺乏统计学效力,之前没有研究在整个孕周彻底研究这种关联。此外,大多数研究没有区分急诊剖宫产和择期剖宫产。
利用四个北欧国家和西澳大利亚基于人群的登记数据,我们的研究人群包括4987390名单胎活产至1岁,其中包括671646例剖宫产分娩和31073例ASD儿童。我们使用逻辑回归估计剖宫产的比值比(OR)及其95%置信区间(CI),并对孕周、地点、产妇年龄和出生年份进行调整。按孕周亚组和妊娠周数进行分层分析。我们比较了急诊剖宫产和择期剖宫产,以研究它们在ASD风险方面的潜在差异。
与阴道分娩相比,剖宫产分娩中ASD的总体调整后OR为1.26(95%CI 1.22 - 1.30)。孕周26 - 36周、37 - 38周、39 - 41周和42 - 44周亚组的分层OR分别为1.25(1.15 - 1.37)、1.16(1.09 - 1.23)、1.34(1.28 - 1.40)和1.17(1.04 - 1.30)。从妊娠36周到42周,剖宫产在每个孕周都与ASD风险显著相关,在所有研究地点一致(OR范围为1.16 - 1.38)。急诊剖宫产和择期剖宫产在ASD风险方面没有统计学显著差异。
在这五个国家中,与阴道分娩相比,在妊娠36周到42周期间,急诊或择期剖宫产始终与ASD风险适度增加相关。