Maxwell Daniel, Majid Nisar, Adan Guhad, Abdirahman Khalif, Kim Jeeyon Janet
Feinstein International Center, Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, 114 Curtis Street, Somerville, MA 02144, USA.
Food Policy. 2016 Dec;65:63-73. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.11.001.
In 2011-12, Somalia experienced the worst famine of the twenty- first century. Since then, research on the famine has focused almost exclusively on the external response, the reasons for the delay in the international response, and the implications for international humanitarian action in the context of the "global war on terror." This paper focuses on the internal, Somali response to the famine. Themes of diversification, mobility and flexibility are all important to understanding how people coped with the famine, but this paper focuses on the factor that seemed to determine whether and how well people survived the famine: social connectedness, the extent of the social networks of affected populations, and the ability of these networks to mobilize resources. These factors ultimately determined how well people coped with the famine. The nature of reciprocity, the resources available within people's networks, and the collective risks and hazards faced within networks, all determined people's individual and household outcomes in the famine and are related to the social structures and social hierarchies within Somali society. But these networks had a distinctly negative side as well-social identity and social networks were also exploited to trap humanitarian assistance, turn displaced people into "aid bait," and to a large degree, determined who benefited from aid once it started to flow. This paper addresses several questions: How did Somali communities and households cope with the famine of 2011 in the absence of any state-led response-and a significant delay in a major international response? What can be learned from these practices to improve our understanding of famine, and of mitigation, response and building resilience to future crises?
2011年至2012年期间,索马里经历了21世纪最严重的饥荒。自那时以来,对这场饥荒的研究几乎完全集中在外部应对措施、国际应对行动延迟的原因以及在“全球反恐战争”背景下对国际人道主义行动的影响。本文关注的是索马里国内对饥荒的应对。多样化、流动性和灵活性等主题对于理解人们如何应对饥荒都很重要,但本文关注的是似乎决定人们能否在饥荒中生存以及生存状况的因素:社会联系、受影响人群的社会网络范围以及这些网络调动资源的能力。这些因素最终决定了人们应对饥荒的能力。互惠的性质、人们网络中可获得的资源以及网络内部面临的集体风险和危害,都决定了人们在饥荒中的个人和家庭结局,并与索马里社会的社会结构和社会等级制度相关。但这些网络也有明显的负面影响——社会身份和社会网络也被利用来截留人道主义援助,将流离失所者变成“援助诱饵”,并且在很大程度上决定了援助开始发放后谁能从中受益。本文探讨了几个问题:在没有任何国家主导的应对措施以及重大国际应对行动严重延迟的情况下,索马里社区和家庭是如何应对2011年饥荒的?从这些做法中可以学到什么,以增进我们对饥荒以及减轻饥荒影响、应对饥荒和增强对未来危机的恢复力的理解?