Suppr超能文献

丙泊酚与硫喷妥钠用于择期剖宫产麻醉诱导的比较。

Comparison of propofol and thiopentone for induction of anaesthesia for elective caesarean section.

作者信息

Valtonen M, Kanto J, Rosenberg P

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Turku, Finland.

出版信息

Anaesthesia. 1989 Sep;44(9):758-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1989.tb09264.x.

Abstract

Propofol 2.5 mg/kg was compared with thiopentone 5 mg/kg as an induction agent for elective Caesarean section. Thirty-two healthy women with cephalopelvic disproportion were included in an open randomised study. The placental transfer of propofol was also studied in 10 other mothers given a single dose of 2.5 mg/kg. The induction characteristics and haemodynamic response to propofol and thiopentone were similar. Side effects were rare with both agents, but propofol caused more discomfort on injection compared to thiopentone. Recovery times were shorter after propofol as evaluated by time to orientation, recovery scoring after anaesthesia and measurements with the Maddox wing. Rapid placental transfer and significant fetal uptake were detected for propofol. There was no significant neonatal depression as assessed by Apgar scores and blood gas analyses. Propofol appears to be a suitable alternative to thiopentone as an induction agent for anaesthesia in elective Caesarean section.

摘要

将丙泊酚2.5毫克/千克与硫喷妥钠5毫克/千克作为择期剖宫产的诱导剂进行比较。一项开放性随机研究纳入了32名患有头盆不称的健康女性。还对另外10名单次给予2.5毫克/千克丙泊酚的母亲进行了丙泊酚的胎盘转运研究。丙泊酚和硫喷妥钠的诱导特征及血流动力学反应相似。两种药物的副作用都很少见,但与硫喷妥钠相比,丙泊酚注射时引起的不适更多。根据定向时间、麻醉后恢复评分以及使用马多克斯翼进行测量评估,丙泊酚后的恢复时间更短。检测到丙泊酚有快速的胎盘转运和显著的胎儿摄取。根据阿普加评分和血气分析评估,未发现明显的新生儿抑制。丙泊酚似乎是硫喷妥钠作为择期剖宫产麻醉诱导剂的合适替代品。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验