• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

政治、政策、生育主义与实践:土耳其堕胎及生殖健康服务的可获得性与可及性

Politics, policies, pronatalism, and practice: availability and accessibility of abortion and reproductive health services in Turkey.

作者信息

MacFarlane Katrina A, O'Neil Mary Lou, Tekdemir Deniz, Çetin Elvin, Bilgen Barış, Foster Angel M

机构信息

Former graduate student, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Director, Gender and Women's Studies Research Center, Kadir Has University, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Reprod Health Matters. 2016 Nov;24(48):62-70. doi: 10.1016/j.rhm.2016.11.002.

DOI:10.1016/j.rhm.2016.11.002
PMID:28024680
Abstract

Turkey has maintained liberal contraception and abortion policies since the 1980s. In 2012, the government proposed to restrict abortion; a bill limiting abortion was later drafted but never passed into law. Since the proposed restriction, women have reported difficulty accessing abortion services across Turkey. We aimed to better understand the current availability of abortion and reproductive health services in Istanbul and explore whether access to services has changed since 2012. In 2015, we completed 14 in-depth interviews with women and 11 semi-structured interviews with key informants. We transcribed all interviews and completed content and thematic analyses of the data. Key informants had good knowledge about the political discourse and the current abortion law. In contrast, women were familiar with the political discourse but had mixed information about the current status of abortion and were unsure about the legality of their own abortions. There was consensus that access to services has become more limited in the last five years due to the political climate, thus advocacy to prioritize reproductive health services, and abortion care in particular, in the public health system are needed.

摘要

自20世纪80年代以来,土耳其一直维持着宽松的避孕和堕胎政策。2012年,政府提议限制堕胎;随后起草了一项限制堕胎的法案,但从未通过成为法律。自提议限制堕胎以来,土耳其各地的妇女报告称在获取堕胎服务方面遇到困难。我们旨在更好地了解伊斯坦布尔目前堕胎和生殖健康服务的可及性,并探讨自2012年以来服务的获取情况是否发生了变化。2015年,我们完成了对14名女性的深入访谈以及对11名关键信息提供者的半结构化访谈。我们转录了所有访谈内容,并对数据进行了内容和主题分析。关键信息提供者对政治话语和现行堕胎法有很好的了解。相比之下,女性熟悉政治话语,但对堕胎的现状信息不一,并且不确定自己堕胎的合法性。大家一致认为,由于政治气候的原因,在过去五年中服务的获取变得更加有限,因此需要倡导在公共卫生系统中优先提供生殖健康服务,特别是堕胎护理服务。

相似文献

1
Politics, policies, pronatalism, and practice: availability and accessibility of abortion and reproductive health services in Turkey.政治、政策、生育主义与实践:土耳其堕胎及生殖健康服务的可获得性与可及性
Reprod Health Matters. 2016 Nov;24(48):62-70. doi: 10.1016/j.rhm.2016.11.002.
2
"It was as if society didn't want a woman to get an abortion": a qualitative study in Istanbul, Turkey.“仿佛社会不希望女性堕胎”:土耳其伊斯坦布尔的一项定性研究
Contraception. 2017 Feb;95(2):154-160. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.07.190. Epub 2016 Jul 29.
3
The unmet need for safe abortion in Turkey: a role for medical abortion and training of medical students.土耳其对安全堕胎的未满足需求:药物流产及医学生培训的作用。
Reprod Health Matters. 2015 Feb;22(44 Suppl 1):26-35. doi: 10.1016/S0968-8080(14)43790-X.
4
Family planning policy in the United States: the converging politics of abortion and contraception.美国的计划生育政策:堕胎与避孕的趋同政治
Contraception. 2016 May;93(5):412-20. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.01.007. Epub 2016 Jan 13.
5
Abortion and Islam: policies and practice in the Middle East and North Africa.堕胎与伊斯兰教:中东和北非的政策与实践
Reprod Health Matters. 2007 May;15(29):75-84. doi: 10.1016/S0968-8080(06)29279-6.
6
Reproductive health and the politics of abortion.生殖健康与堕胎政治
Int J Equity Health. 2020 Mar 17;19(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-1157-1.
7
Population politics, reproductive governance and access to abortion in Turkey.人口政治、生殖治理与土耳其的堕胎服务
Cult Health Sex. 2024 Oct;26(10):1316-1332. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2024.2317734. Epub 2024 Feb 25.
8
How Do Pronatalist Policies Impact Women's Access to Safe Abortion Services in Turkey?生育主义政策如何影响土耳其女性获得安全堕胎服务的机会?
Int J Health Serv. 2019 Oct;49(4):799-816. doi: 10.1177/0020731419855877. Epub 2019 Jul 1.
9
Shaping the abortion policy - competing discourses on the Zambian termination of pregnancy act.塑造堕胎政策 - 赞比亚终止妊娠法案的竞争话语。
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Jan 28;18(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0908-8.
10
Abortion services at hospitals in Istanbul.伊斯坦布尔各医院的堕胎服务。
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2017 Apr;22(2):88-93. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2016.1276163. Epub 2017 Jan 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Future-Proofing the ICPD PoA: Reproductive Rights in a Low-Fertility World.确保《国际人口与发展会议行动纲领》面向未来:低生育率世界中的生殖权利。
Stud Fam Plann. 2025 Jun;56(2):198-206. doi: 10.1111/sifp.70009. Epub 2025 May 5.
2
The impact of third-party authorization requirements on abortion-related outcomes: a synthesis of legal and health evidence.第三方授权要求对堕胎相关结果的影响:法律和健康证据的综合分析。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Oct 23;23(1):2065. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16307-1.