Dinakar Chitra, Chipps Bradley E
Pediatrics. 2017 Jan;139(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-3438.
Asthma affects an estimated 7 million children and causes significant health care and disease burden. The most recent iteration of the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute asthma guidelines, the Expert Panel Report 3, emphasizes the assessment and monitoring of asthma control in the management of asthma. Asthma control refers to the degree to which the manifestations of asthma are minimized by therapeutic interventions and the goals of therapy are met. Although assessment of asthma severity is used to guide initiation of therapy, monitoring of asthma control helps determine whether therapy should be maintained or adjusted. The nuances of estimation of asthma control include understanding concepts of current impairment and future risk and incorporating their measurement into clinical practice. Impairment is assessed on the basis of frequency and intensity of symptoms, variations in lung function, and limitations of daily activities. "Risk" refers to the likelihood of exacerbations, progressive loss of lung function, or adverse effects from medications. Currently available ambulatory tools to measure asthma control range are subjective measures, such as patient-reported composite asthma control score instruments or objective measures of lung function, airway hyperreactivity, and biomarkers. Because asthma control exhibits short- and long-term variability, health care providers need to be vigilant regarding the fluctuations in the factors that can create discordance between subjective and objective assessment of asthma control. Familiarity with the properties, application, and relative value of these measures will enable health care providers to choose the optimal set of measures that will adhere to national standards of care and ensure delivery of high-quality care customized to their patients.
据估计,哮喘影响着700万儿童,并造成了巨大的医疗保健和疾病负担。美国国立心肺血液研究所哮喘指南的最新版本,即《专家小组报告3》,强调了在哮喘管理中对哮喘控制情况的评估和监测。哮喘控制是指通过治疗干预将哮喘症状减轻到何种程度以及达到治疗目标的情况。虽然哮喘严重程度评估用于指导治疗的启动,但哮喘控制情况的监测有助于确定治疗是否应维持或调整。哮喘控制评估的细微差别包括理解当前损伤和未来风险的概念,并将其测量纳入临床实践。根据症状的频率和强度、肺功能变化以及日常活动受限情况来评估损伤。“风险”是指哮喘发作、肺功能逐渐丧失或药物不良反应的可能性。目前可用于测量哮喘控制范围的门诊工具包括主观测量方法,如患者报告的综合哮喘控制评分工具,以及肺功能、气道高反应性和生物标志物的客观测量方法。由于哮喘控制呈现短期和长期的变异性,医疗保健提供者需要警惕那些可能导致哮喘控制主观和客观评估不一致的因素的波动。熟悉这些测量方法的特性、应用和相对价值,将使医疗保健提供者能够选择符合国家护理标准的最佳测量方法组合,并确保为患者提供定制的高质量护理。