Suppr超能文献

证据与证据缺口——引言

Evidence and evidence gaps - an introduction.

作者信息

Dreier Gabriele, Löhler Jan

机构信息

German Study Center of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Bonn, Germany; Clinical Trials Unit of the Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Germany.

German Study Center of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Bonn, Germany; Scientific Institute for Applied Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Bad Bramstedt, Germany.

出版信息

GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Dec 15;15:Doc11. doi: 10.3205/cto000138. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

Medical treatment requires the implementation of existing evidence in the decision making process in order to be able to find the best possible diagnostic, therapeutic or prognostic measure for the individual patient based on the physician's own expertise. Clinical trials form the evidence base and ideally, their results are assembled, analyzed, summarized, and made available in systematic review articles. Beside planning, conducting, and evaluating clinical trials in conformity with GCP (good clinical practice), it is essential that all results of conducted studies are publicly available in order to avoid publication bias. This includes also the public registration of planned and cancelled trials. During the last 25 years, evidence-based medicine became increasingly important in medical care and research. It is closely associated with the names of Archibald Cochrane and David Sackett. About 15 years ago, the Deutsche Cochrane Zentrum (Cochrane Germany) and the Deutsche Netzwerk Evidenzbasierte Medizin e.V. (German Network for Evidence-based Medicine, DNEbM) were founded in Germany. In the International Cochrane Collaboration, clinicians and methodologists come together on an interdisciplinary level to further develop methods of evidence-based medicine and to discuss the topics of evidence generation and processing as well as knowledge transfer. Evidence is particularly important for physicians in the process of decision making, however, at the same time it is the base of a scientific proof of benefit for the patient and finally for the payers in health care. The closure of evidence gaps requires enormously high staff and financial resources, significant organizational efforts, and it is only successful when clinical and methodical expertise as well as specific knowledge in the field of clinical research are included. On the other hand, the knowledge has to be transferred into practice. For this purpose, practice guidelines, meetings, databases, information portals with processed evidence as well as specific journals and finally teaching are appropriate vehicles. One problem is the multitude of information so that knowledge gaps may affect the clinical routine despite actually existing evidence. Generally, it still takes several years until new knowledge is implemented in daily routine. The German Society of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Hals-, Nasen- und Ohren-Heilkunde, Kopf- und Hals-Chirurgie e.V., DGHNOKHC) and the Professional Association of Otolaryngologists (Deutscher Berufsverband der HNO-Ärzte e.V., BVHNO) have fundamental interest in supporting their members in generating, processing, and providing evidence as well as accompanying knowledge transfer. It encompasses the fields of diagnostics, therapy, and prognosis in the same way as prevention and applies to medicinal products as well as to medical devices or surgical procedures. The base for this is the regular assessment of evidence gaps, also in the area of established procedures, that has to be followed by a prioritization of research questions and the subsequent initiation of clinical research. In addition, large trials verifying therapies and diagnostics, for example in the context of daily conditions after approval, can only be conducted combining all resources in the ENT community. Together, the executive committees of the DGHNOKHC and the BVHNO founded the German Study Center of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (Deutsches Studienzentrum für Hals-, Nasen- und Ohren-Heilkunde, Kopf- und Hals-Chirurgie, DSZ-HNO). First projects have been initiated, among those a clinical trial on the therapy of sudden hearing loss supported by the BMBF and a survey on evidence gaps in oto-rhino-laryngology. It seems to be both reasonable and feasible to make available methodological expertise via such an infrastructure of a study center for physicians in hospitals and private practices in order to support clinical research and to implement the principles of evidence-based medicine in daily routine.

摘要

医学治疗要求在决策过程中运用现有证据,以便基于医生自身的专业知识为个体患者找到最佳的诊断、治疗或预后措施。临床试验构成了证据基础,理想情况下,其结果会被汇总、分析、总结,并在系统评价文章中呈现。除了按照药物临床试验质量管理规范(GCP)来规划、开展和评估临床试验外,已开展研究的所有结果都必须公开可得,以避免发表偏倚,这一点至关重要。这还包括对计划中和已取消试验的公开注册。在过去25年里,循证医学在医疗保健和研究中变得越来越重要,它与阿奇博尔德·科克伦和大卫·萨克特的名字紧密相连。大约15年前,德国科克伦中心(Cochrane Germany)和德国循证医学网络(German Network for Evidence-based Medicine, DNEbM)在德国成立。在国际科克伦协作组织中,临床医生和方法学家跨学科合作,以进一步发展循证医学方法,并讨论证据生成与处理以及知识转移等话题。证据在医生的决策过程中尤为重要,然而,与此同时,它也是证明对患者乃至最终对医疗保健支付方有益的科学依据。填补证据空白需要极高的人力和财力资源,以及大量的组织工作,并且只有当临床和方法学专业知识以及临床研究领域的特定知识都被纳入时才会成功。另一方面,知识必须转化为实践。为此,实践指南、会议、数据库、带有经过处理的证据的信息门户以及特定期刊,最后还有教学,都是合适的载体。一个问题是信息繁多,以至于尽管实际存在证据,但知识空白仍可能影响临床日常工作。一般来说,新知识在日常工作中得到应用仍需要数年时间。德国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学会(Deutsche Gesellschaft für Hals-, Nasen- und Ohren-Heilkunde, Kopf- und Hals-Chirurgie e.V., DGHNOKHC)和耳鼻咽喉科医生专业协会(Deutscher Berufsverband der HNO-Ärzte e.V., BVHNO)在支持其成员生成、处理和提供证据以及伴随知识转移方面有着根本利益。这涵盖了诊断、治疗和预后领域,与预防领域一样,适用于药品以及医疗设备或外科手术。其基础是定期评估证据空白,在既定程序领域也是如此,随后要对研究问题进行优先级排序,并随后启动临床研究。此外,例如在获批后的日常情况下验证治疗方法和诊断手段的大型试验,只有整合耳鼻喉科领域的所有资源才能开展。DGHNOKHC和BVHNO的执行委员会共同成立了德国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学研究中心(Deutsches Studienzentrum für Hals-, Nasen- und Ohren-Heilkunde, Kopf- und Hals-Chirurgie, DSZ-HNO)。已经启动了首批项目,其中包括一项由德国联邦教育与研究部(BMBF)支持的关于突发性听力损失治疗的临床试验,以及一项关于耳鼻咽喉科证据空白的调查。通过这样一个研究中心的基础设施为医院和私人诊所的医生提供方法学专业知识,以支持临床研究并在日常工作中贯彻循证医学原则,似乎既合理又可行。

相似文献

1
Evidence and evidence gaps - an introduction.证据与证据缺口——引言
GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Dec 15;15:Doc11. doi: 10.3205/cto000138. eCollection 2016.
2
[Evidence and Evidence Gaps - an Introduction].[证据与证据空白——引言]
Laryngorhinootologie. 2016 Apr;95 Suppl 1:S6-S12. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-108944. Epub 2016 Apr 29.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
9

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Evidence gaps in ENT surgery - a qualitative survey.耳鼻喉科手术中的证据缺口——一项定性调查
GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Dec 15;15:Doc10. doi: 10.3205/cto000137. eCollection 2016.
2
[Adopted in patient care, but not yet familiar].[已应用于患者护理,但尚未熟悉]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2014;108(10):594-6. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2014.10.016. Epub 2014 Nov 15.
3
Biomedical research: increasing value, reducing waste.生物医学研究:提高价值,减少浪费。
Lancet. 2014 Jan 11;383(9912):101-4. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62329-6. Epub 2014 Jan 8.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验