Suppr超能文献

对衡量护士对精神护理态度及精神护理活动频率的量表的批判性分析。

A critical analysis of scales to measure the attitude of nurses toward spiritual care and the frequency of spiritual nursing care activities.

作者信息

Garssen Bert, Ebenau Anne Frederieke, Visser Anja, Uwland Nicoline, Groot Marieke

机构信息

Center for Psycho-Oncology, Helen Dowling Institute, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.

Department Anesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Care/Expertise Center for Palliative Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Nurs Inq. 2017 Jul;24(3). doi: 10.1111/nin.12178. Epub 2016 Dec 26.

Abstract

Quantitative studies have assessed nurses' attitudes toward and frequency of spiritual care [SC] and which factors are of influence on this attitude and frequency. However, we had doubts about the construct validity of the scales used in these studies. Our objective was to evaluate scales measuring nursing SC. Articles about the development and psychometric evaluation of SC scales have been identified, using, Web of Science, and CINAHL, and evaluated with respect to the psychometric properties and item content of the scales. Item content was evaluated by each of the five authors with respect to the following questions: Does the item (1) reflect a general opinion about SC instead of a personal willingness to offer SC; (2) reflect general psychosocial care instead of specific SC; (3) focus solely on religious care; (4) contain the words 'spiritual' (care/needs/health/strengths, etc.); and (5) contain multiple propositions, or have an unclear meaning? We found eight scales. Psychometric analysis of these scales was often meager and the items of all but one scale suffered from two or more of the five problems described above. This leads us to conclude that many quantitative results in this area are based on findings with questionable scales. Suggestions for improvements are provided.

摘要

定量研究评估了护士对精神护理(SC)的态度、频率以及哪些因素会影响这种态度和频率。然而,我们对这些研究中所使用量表的结构效度存在疑问。我们的目的是评估测量护理SC的量表。通过使用科学网(Web of Science)和护理学与健康领域数据库(CINAHL)检索了关于SC量表的开发和心理测量学评估的文章,并就量表的心理测量学特性和项目内容进行了评估。五位作者分别就以下问题对项目内容进行了评估:该项目(1)是否反映了对SC的总体看法而非提供SC的个人意愿;(2)是否反映了一般的心理社会护理而非特定的SC;(3)是否仅关注宗教护理;(4)是否包含“精神的”(护理/需求/健康/力量等)一词;以及(5)是否包含多个命题或含义不明确?我们找到了八个量表。这些量表的心理测量分析往往很薄弱,除了一个量表外,所有量表的项目都存在上述五个问题中的两个或更多问题。这使我们得出结论,该领域的许多定量结果是基于使用存在问题的量表得出的。文中提供了改进建议。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验