• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

长期护理机构的综合药物评估:实施过程的历史和 2015 年的结果。

Comprehensive Medication Reviews in Long-term Care Facilities: History of Process Implementation and 2015 Results.

机构信息

1 Omnicare, Cincinnati, Ohio.

出版信息

J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Jan;23(1):22-26. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.1.22.

DOI:10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.1.22
PMID:28025922
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10398316/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Since 2013, Part D sponsors have been required to offer comprehensive medication reviews (CMRs) to all beneficiaries enrolled in their medication therapy management (MTM) programs at least annually, including those in long-term care (LTC) settings. Since that time, MTM providers have found that accessing and completing CMRs with beneficiaries is frequently prohibitively complex, since the process often requires a live, face-to-face interactive interview where the beneficiary resides. However, with the migration of the CMR completion rate from a star ratings display measure to an active measure, coupled with the new CMR completion rate cutpoints for 2016, accessing this population for CMR completion has heightened importance.

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

Our proprietary consultant pharmacist (CP) software was programmed in 2012 to produce a cover letter, medication action plan, and personal medication list per CMS standardized format specifications. Using this system, CPs were trained to perform and document CMRs and the interactive interviews. MTM-eligible Part D beneficiaries, identified by several contracted clients as residing in LTC serviced by Omnicare, were provided CMRs and summaries written in CMS standardized format by CPs. Residents with cognitive impairment were identified using 3 data elements in the Minimum Data Set (MDS).

OBSERVATIONS

In 2015, 7,935 MTM-eligible beneficiaries were identified as receiving medications from an Omnicare pharmacy. After excluding those who were disenrolled by their prescription drug plans, discharged from the LTC facility, or resided in a LTC facility no longer serviced by Omnicare, 5,593 residents were available for CMR completion. Of these, only 3% refused the CMR offer, and 5,392 CMRs (96%) were completed successfully. Thirty-nine percent of residents had cognitive impairment per MDS assessments; in those instances, CMRs were conducted with someone other than the beneficiary. Based on the CMRs and interactive interviews, 7,527 drug therapy problem recommendations were made to prescribers, about 50% of which resulted in an alteration in therapy, including reductions in polypharmacy and high-risk medications.

IMPLICATIONS

The CMR process and written summary in CMS standardized format works effectively for residents in LTC when performed by CPs in the facility, as evidenced by high completion rates and drug therapy problem identification/resolution. Part D plans should further consider using CPs to conduct CMRs in LTC settings.

DISCLOSURES

No outside funding supported this research. All authors are employees of Omnicare, a CVS Health Company, and are stockholders of CVS Health. O'Shea and Zarowitz have received research funding (unrelated to the submitted work) from Acadia, AstraZeneca, and Sunovion. The abstract for this article was presented as a research poster at the Academy of Managed Care and Specialty Pharmacy 2016 Annual Meeting; April 21, 2016; San Francisco, California. Study concept and design were contributed by O'Shea and Zarowitz, along with Erwin. O'Shea collected the data, and data interpretation was performed primarily by O'Shea, along with Zarowitz and Erwin. The manuscript was written by O'Shea, along with Zarowitz, and revised primarily by Zarowitz, along with O'Shea and Erwin.

摘要

背景

自 2013 年以来,要求 Part D 赞助商向其药物治疗管理 (MTM) 计划中所有参加者(包括长期护理 (LTC) 环境中的参加者)提供全面药物审查 (CMR),至少每年一次。自那时以来,MTM 提供商发现,与受益人进行 CMR 访问和完成工作非常复杂,因为该过程通常需要进行现场面对面的互动式访谈,而受益人需要在其居住的地方进行访谈。然而,随着 CMR 完成率从星级评级显示措施转变为积极措施,再加上 2016 年新的 CMR 完成率截止点,为完成 CMR 访问,这一人群变得尤为重要。

项目描述

我们专有的顾问药剂师 (CP) 软件于 2012 年编程,可根据 CMS 标准化格式规范生成求职信、药物行动计划和个人用药清单。使用该系统,CP 接受了进行和记录 CMR 和互动式访谈的培训。根据几家签约客户的要求,确定 MTM 合格的 Part D 受益人居住在由 Omnicare 提供服务的 LTC 中,由 CP 以 CMS 标准化格式提供 CMR 和摘要。使用最低数据集中的 3 个数据元素 (MDS) 识别认知障碍居民。

观察结果

2015 年,确定了 7935 名符合 MTM 条件的受益人,他们从 Omnicare 药房领取药物。在排除了其处方药计划退保、从 LTC 机构出院或居住在不再由 Omnicare 提供服务的 LTC 机构的人之后,有 5593 名居民可以进行 CMR 完成。其中,只有 3%的人拒绝了 CMR 服务,5392 份 CMR(96%)成功完成。根据 MDS 评估,39%的居民有认知障碍;在这些情况下,与受益人以外的人进行了 CMR。根据 CMR 和互动式访谈,向处方医生提出了 7527 项药物治疗问题建议,其中约有 50%导致治疗方案改变,包括减少多种药物治疗和高危药物。

意义

CP 在设施中进行的 CMR 过程和 CMS 标准化格式的书面摘要对 LTC 中的居民非常有效,这一点从高完成率和药物治疗问题的识别/解决情况得到了证明。Part D 计划应进一步考虑使用 CP 在 LTC 环境中进行 CMR。

披露

没有外部资金支持这项研究。所有作者均为 Omnicare(CVS Health 公司的一部分)的员工,也是 CVS Health 的股东。O'Shea 和 Zarowitz 从 Acadia、AstraZeneca 和 Sunovion 获得了与提交工作无关的研究资金。本文摘要作为研究海报在 2016 年 Academy of Managed Care and Specialty Pharmacy 年会上展示;2016 年 4 月 21 日;加利福尼亚州旧金山。O'Shea 和 Zarowitz 提出了研究概念和设计,同时还有 Erwin。O'Shea 收集了数据,数据解释主要由 O'Shea 完成,同时还有 Zarowitz 和 Erwin。O'Shea 主要与 Zarowitz 一起撰写了手稿,并由 Zarowitz 主要与 O'Shea 和 Erwin 一起进行了修订。

相似文献

1
Comprehensive Medication Reviews in Long-term Care Facilities: History of Process Implementation and 2015 Results.长期护理机构的综合药物评估:实施过程的历史和 2015 年的结果。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Jan;23(1):22-26. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.1.22.
2
Improving Comprehensive Medication Review Acceptance by Using a Standardized Recruitment Script: A Randomized Control Trial.使用标准化招募脚本提高综合药物审查接受率:一项随机对照试验。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Jan;23(1):13-21. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.1.13.
3
Evaluation of Comprehensive Medication Review Completion Rates Using 3 Patient Outreach Models.使用 3 种患者外展模型评估综合药物审查完成率。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016 Jul;22(7):796-800. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.7.796.
4
Positive Medication Changes Resulting from Comprehensive and Noncomprehensive Medication Reviews in a Medicare Part D Population.医疗保险部分 D 人群中全面和非全面药物审查导致的积极药物变化。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Mar;23(3):388-394. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.3.388.
5
Medication Therapy Management: 10 Years of Experience in a Large Integrated Health Care System.药物治疗管理:在大型综合性医疗保健系统中的 10 年经验。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 Sep;26(9):1057-1066. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.9.1057.
6
Effect of an Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experience on Medication Therapy Management Services in a Centralized Retail Pharmacy Program.进阶药学实践经验对集中式零售药房计划中药物治疗管理服务的影响。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 May;23(5):561-565. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.5.561.
7
Comparison of Medication Therapy Management Services and Their Effects on Health Care Utilization and Medication Adherence.药物治疗管理服务的比较及其对医疗保健利用和药物依从性的影响。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019 Jun;25(6):688-695. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.25.6.688.
8
Findings from a National Survey of Medicare Beneficiary Perspectives on the Medicare Part D Medication Therapy Management Standardized Format.医疗保险受益人对医疗保险部分 D 药物治疗管理标准化格式的观点的全国调查结果。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019 Mar;25(3):366-391. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.25.3.366.
9
A new ballgame: comprehensive medication review.一种新的活动:全面药物评估。
Consult Pharm. 2014 Feb;29(2):76-8, 80-1, 83. doi: 10.4140/TCP.n.2014.76.
10
The Effect of Plan Type and Comprehensive Medication Reviews on High-Risk Medication Use.计划类型和综合药物审查对高风险药物使用的影响。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 May;24(5):416-422. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.24.5.416.

引用本文的文献

1
Medication Management in Portuguese Long-Term Care Facilities: A Preliminary Cross-Sectional Study.葡萄牙长期护理机构中的药物管理:一项初步横断面研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Oct 29;12(21):2145. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12212145.
2
A nurse practitioner led protocol to address polypharmacy in long-term care.护士从业者主导的方案以解决长期护理中的多种用药问题。
Geriatr Nurs. 2020 Nov-Dec;41(6):956-961. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2020.07.002. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
3
Pharmacist-led medication reviews for geriatric residents in German long-term care facilities.药剂师主导的德国长期护理机构老年居民药物治疗审查。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Feb 11;19(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1052-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Medicare program; Contract Year 2015 Policy and Technical Changes to the Medicare Advantage and the Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit Programs. Final rule.医疗保险计划;2015 年医保优势计划和医疗保险处方药福利计划的合同年度政策与技术变更。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2014 May 23;79(100):29843-968.
2
A new ballgame: comprehensive medication review.一种新的活动:全面药物评估。
Consult Pharm. 2014 Feb;29(2):76-8, 80-1, 83. doi: 10.4140/TCP.n.2014.76.
3
Medication therapy management: a challenge for pharmacists.药物治疗管理:药剂师面临的一项挑战。
Consult Pharm. 2012 Nov;27(11):782-96. doi: 10.4140/TCP.n.2012.782.
4
Nursing home assessment of cognitive impairment: development and testing of a brief instrument of mental status.养老院认知障碍评估:一种简短精神状态评估工具的开发与测试
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008 Nov;56(11):2069-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01944.x.