• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药剂师主导的德国长期护理机构老年居民药物治疗审查。

Pharmacist-led medication reviews for geriatric residents in German long-term care facilities.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Bonn, An der Immenburg 4, 53121, Bonn, Germany.

AOK Rheinland/Hamburg Health Insurance, Kasernenstr. 61, 40213, Düsseldorf, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Geriatr. 2019 Feb 11;19(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1052-z.

DOI:10.1186/s12877-019-1052-z
PMID:30744564
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6371600/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The benefit of medication reviews for long-term care (LTC) residents has been generally recognized throughout health care systems. Whereas many studies showed the impact of comprehensive medication reviews performed by specialized clinical pharmacists, little is known about the impact of medication reviews performed by community pharmacists. Involving them in the provision of medication reviews may help satisfy the increasing demand for ensuring medication safety.

METHODS

Community pharmacists supplying drugs to the LTC facilities performed a medication review for German LTC residents aged at least 65 years and taking five or more drugs per day based on the patients' medication only. Documented potential drug-related problems (DRPs) and the implementation rate of pharmaceutical interventions were evaluated descriptively. To assess the quality of the medication reviews, we developed a corresponding reference system based on the analysis of two experienced clinical pharmacists.

RESULTS

Twelve pharmacies performed medication reviews for 94 LTC residents. Overall, the pharmacists documented 154 potential DRPs (mean 1.6 per patient, SD 1.5) of which the most common were drug-drug interactions (40%) followed by potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) (16%) and inappropriate dosages (14%). 33% of the pharmacists' interventions to solve DRPs were successfully implemented, mostly dosage adjustments. The identification of potentially severe drug-drug interactions and PIM showed the highest agreement (88 and 73%) with the reference system.

CONCLUSIONS

The medication review program of community pharmacists for LTC residents led to the identification of relevant DRPs. The reference system assessing the quality of the service can contribute to its transparency and reveals the potential for its improvement. The community pharmacists' knowledge of the LTC residents and their relation to the prescribers is crucial for providing successful medication reviews.

摘要

背景

长期护理(LTC)居民用药审查的益处已在整个医疗保健系统中得到普遍认可。虽然许多研究表明,由专业临床药师进行全面药物审查的影响,但对于社区药师进行药物审查的影响知之甚少。让他们参与提供药物审查可能有助于满足确保药物安全的需求不断增加。

方法

为德国 LTC 设施提供药物的社区药剂师仅根据患者的药物为至少 65 岁且每天服用五种或更多药物的 LTC 居民进行药物审查。描述性评估记录的潜在药物相关问题(DRP)和药物干预实施率。为了评估药物审查的质量,我们根据两名经验丰富的临床药师的分析,制定了相应的参考系统。

结果

12 家药店为 94 名 LTC 居民进行了药物审查。总体而言,药剂师记录了 154 个潜在的 DRP(平均每个患者 1.6 个,SD 1.5),其中最常见的是药物相互作用(40%),其次是潜在不适当药物(PIM)(16%)和不适当剂量(14%)。药剂师解决 DRP 的干预措施中有 33%得到了成功实施,主要是剂量调整。识别潜在严重的药物相互作用和 PIM 与参考系统的一致性最高(88%和 73%)。

结论

社区药师为 LTC 居民进行的药物审查计划导致发现了相关的 DRP。评估服务质量的参考系统有助于提高其透明度,并显示出改进的潜力。社区药剂师对 LTC 居民的了解及其与开处方者的关系对于提供成功的药物审查至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e622/6371600/8d363e145c86/12877_2019_1052_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e622/6371600/cc6fc848a985/12877_2019_1052_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e622/6371600/89a9085a41aa/12877_2019_1052_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e622/6371600/589c1bd99e7e/12877_2019_1052_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e622/6371600/8d363e145c86/12877_2019_1052_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e622/6371600/cc6fc848a985/12877_2019_1052_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e622/6371600/89a9085a41aa/12877_2019_1052_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e622/6371600/589c1bd99e7e/12877_2019_1052_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e622/6371600/8d363e145c86/12877_2019_1052_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Pharmacist-led medication reviews for geriatric residents in German long-term care facilities.药剂师主导的德国长期护理机构老年居民药物治疗审查。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Feb 11;19(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1052-z.
2
Clinical medication reviews in elderly patients with polypharmacy: a cross-sectional study on drug-related problems in the Netherlands.老年多重用药患者的临床用药评估:荷兰药物相关问题的横断面研究
Int J Clin Pharm. 2016 Feb;38(1):46-53. doi: 10.1007/s11096-015-0199-8. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
3
Drug-related problems identified during geriatric medication review in the community pharmacy.社区药房老年用药审查期间发现的药物相关问题。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2018 Feb;40(1):109-118. doi: 10.1007/s11096-017-0571-y. Epub 2017 Nov 29.
4
Determine the impact of a structured pharmacist-led medication review - a controlled intervention study to optimise medication safety for residents in long-term care facilities.确定以药剂师为主导的结构化药物审查的影响 - 一项对照干预研究,旨在优化长期护理机构居民的药物安全。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Apr 9;22(1):307. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03025-3.
5
Pharmacists' role in handling problems with prescriptions for antithrombotic medication in Belgian community pharmacies.药剂师在比利时社区药房处理抗血栓药物处方问题中的作用。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2015 Aug;37(4):656-68. doi: 10.1007/s11096-015-0106-3. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
6
Characteristic of drug-related problems and pharmacists' interventions in a stroke unit in Thailand.药物相关问题的特征及药师在泰国卒中单元的干预措施。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2019 Aug;41(4):880-887. doi: 10.1007/s11096-019-00832-4. Epub 2019 May 3.
7
A retrospective study of drug-related problems in Australian aged care homes: medication reviews involving pharmacists and general practitioners.澳大利亚老年护理院药物相关问题的回顾性研究:药剂师和全科医生参与的药物评估。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2011 Feb;17(1):97-103. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01374.x. Epub 2010 Sep 2.
8
A multicenter quality improvement initiative on the impact of pharmacists' postdischarge follow-up to reduce medication-related acute care episodes.一项关于药师出院后随访对减少与药物相关的急性护理事件影响的多中心质量改进计划。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2020 Jun 4;77(12):938-942. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxz334.
9
Medication review in German community pharmacies - Post-hoc analysis of documented drug-related problems and subsequent interventions in the ATHINA-project.德国社区药店的药物审查-ATHINA 项目中记录的药物相关问题及后续干预的事后分析。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2017 Nov;13(6):1127-1134. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2016.10.016. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
10
The status of the performance of medication reviews in German community pharmacies and assessment of the practical performance.德国社区药房药物评估的执行情况及实际操作评估
Int J Clin Pharm. 2016 Dec;38(6):1425-1435. doi: 10.1007/s11096-016-0381-7. Epub 2016 Oct 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Medication Management in Portuguese Long-Term Care Facilities: A Preliminary Cross-Sectional Study.葡萄牙长期护理机构中的药物管理:一项初步横断面研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Oct 29;12(21):2145. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12212145.
2
Impact of a DSS-supported medication review on the safety of drug therapy and quality of life in patients with antithrombotic therapy.决策支持系统辅助的药物评估对接受抗血栓治疗患者的药物治疗安全性及生活质量的影响
Front Pharmacol. 2024 May 23;15:1194201. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1194201. eCollection 2024.
3
Exploring medication safety structures and processes in nursing homes: a cross-sectional study.

本文引用的文献

1
PCNE definition of medication review: reaching agreement.药物评估的PCNE定义:达成共识。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2018 Oct;40(5):1199-1208. doi: 10.1007/s11096-018-0696-7. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
2
Effectiveness of medication review: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.药物评估的有效性:随机对照试验的系统评价与荟萃分析
BMC Fam Pract. 2017 Jan 17;18(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0577-x.
3
Comprehensive Medication Reviews in Long-term Care Facilities: History of Process Implementation and 2015 Results.
探索养老院中的药物安全结构和流程:一项横断面研究。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2023 Dec;45(6):1464-1471. doi: 10.1007/s11096-023-01625-6. Epub 2023 Aug 10.
4
Pharmacist-Led Interventions to Reduce Drug-Related Problems in Prescribing for Pediatric Outpatients in a Developing Country: A Randomized Controlled Trial.药剂师主导的干预措施以减少发展中国家儿科门诊处方中与药物相关的问题:一项随机对照试验
J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2023;28(3):212-221. doi: 10.5863/1551-6776-28.3.212. Epub 2023 Jun 2.
5
Outcomes of Pharmacist-Led Pharmaceutical Care Interventions Within Community Pharmacies: Narrative Review.社区药房中由药剂师主导的药学服务干预的结果:叙述性综述
Integr Pharm Res Pract. 2023 May 15;12:113-126. doi: 10.2147/IPRP.S408340. eCollection 2023.
6
[Polypharmacy in nursing homes: options to improve drug therapy safety].[养老院中的多重用药:提高药物治疗安全性的选择]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2023 May;66(5):530-539. doi: 10.1007/s00103-023-03694-4. Epub 2023 Apr 12.
7
Extended Pharmacist Assessment of Medication Safety for Nursing Home Residents-A Cross-Sectional and Prospective Study.养老院居民用药安全的扩展药师评估——一项横断面和前瞻性研究。
J Clin Med. 2022 Nov 7;11(21):6602. doi: 10.3390/jcm11216602.
8
Determine the impact of a structured pharmacist-led medication review - a controlled intervention study to optimise medication safety for residents in long-term care facilities.确定以药剂师为主导的结构化药物审查的影响 - 一项对照干预研究,旨在优化长期护理机构居民的药物安全。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Apr 9;22(1):307. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03025-3.
9
Drug-Drug Interactions in Elderly Patients with Potentially Inappropriate Medications in Primary Care, Nursing Home and Hospital Settings: A Systematic Review and a Preliminary Study.基层医疗、养老院和医院环境中使用潜在不适当药物的老年患者的药物相互作用:系统评价和初步研究。
Pharmaceutics. 2021 Feb 16;13(2):266. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13020266.
10
An Algorithm for Comprehensive Medication Management in Nursing Homes: Results of the AMBER Project.养老院综合药物管理算法:琥珀项目的结果。
Drug Saf. 2021 Mar;44(3):313-325. doi: 10.1007/s40264-020-01016-0. Epub 2020 Oct 31.
长期护理机构的综合药物评估:实施过程的历史和 2015 年的结果。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Jan;23(1):22-26. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.1.22.
4
Comparison of Pharmacist and Physician Managed Annual Medicare Wellness Services.比较药剂师和医生管理的年度医疗保险健康服务。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016 Dec;22(12):1412-1416. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.12.1412.
5
Medication review in German community pharmacies - Post-hoc analysis of documented drug-related problems and subsequent interventions in the ATHINA-project.德国社区药店的药物审查-ATHINA 项目中记录的药物相关问题及后续干预的事后分析。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2017 Nov;13(6):1127-1134. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2016.10.016. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
6
The status of the performance of medication reviews in German community pharmacies and assessment of the practical performance.德国社区药房药物评估的执行情况及实际操作评估
Int J Clin Pharm. 2016 Dec;38(6):1425-1435. doi: 10.1007/s11096-016-0381-7. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
7
What can Europe learn from the managed care backlash in the United States?欧洲能从美国管理式医疗的强烈抵制中学到什么?
Health Policy. 2016 May;120(5):509-18. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.03.010. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
8
Usually Available Clinical and Laboratory Data Are Insufficient for a Valid Medication Review: A Crossover Study.通常可用的临床和实验室数据不足以进行有效的药物审查:一项交叉研究。
J Nutr Health Aging. 2016 Jan;20(1):71-6. doi: 10.1007/s12603-016-0678-1.
9
Interventions to improve the appropriate use of polypharmacy in older people: a Cochrane systematic review.改善老年人合理使用多种药物的干预措施:一项Cochrane系统评价
BMJ Open. 2015 Dec 9;5(12):e009235. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009235.
10
Clinical medication reviews in elderly patients with polypharmacy: a cross-sectional study on drug-related problems in the Netherlands.老年多重用药患者的临床用药评估:荷兰药物相关问题的横断面研究
Int J Clin Pharm. 2016 Feb;38(1):46-53. doi: 10.1007/s11096-015-0199-8. Epub 2015 Nov 23.