Pécuchet Nicolas, Zonta Eleonora, Didelot Audrey, Combe Pierre, Thibault Constance, Gibault Laure, Lours Camille, Rozenholc Yves, Taly Valérie, Laurent-Puig Pierre, Blons Hélène, Fabre Elizabeth
INSERM UMR-S1147, CNRS SNC 5014, Equipe labélisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, Université Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Department of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou (HEGP), Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
PLoS Med. 2016 Dec 27;13(12):e1002199. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002199. eCollection 2016 Dec.
Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is an approved noninvasive biomarker to test for the presence of EGFR mutations at diagnosis or recurrence of lung cancer. However, studies evaluating ctDNA as a noninvasive "real-time" biomarker to provide prognostic and predictive information in treatment monitoring have given inconsistent results, mainly due to methodological differences. We have recently validated a next-generation sequencing (NGS) approach to detect ctDNA. Using this new approach, we evaluated the clinical usefulness of ctDNA monitoring in a prospective observational series of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
We recruited 124 patients with newly diagnosed advanced NSCLC for ctDNA monitoring. The primary objective was to analyze the prognostic value of baseline ctDNA on overall survival. ctDNA was assessed by ultra-deep targeted NGS using our dedicated variant caller algorithm. Common mutations were validated by digital PCR. Out of the 109 patients with at least one follow-up marker mutation, plasma samples were contributive at baseline (n = 105), at first evaluation (n = 85), and at tumor progression (n = 66). We found that the presence of ctDNA at baseline was an independent marker of poor prognosis, with a median overall survival of 13.6 versus 21.5 mo (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.82, 95% CI 1.01-3.55, p = 0.045) and a median progression-free survival of 4.9 versus 10.4 mo (adjusted HR 2.14, 95% CI 1.30-3.67, p = 0.002). It was also related to the presence of bone and liver metastasis. At first evaluation (E1) after treatment initiation, residual ctDNA was an early predictor of treatment benefit as judged by best radiological response and progression-free survival. Finally, negative ctDNA at E1 was associated with overall survival independently of Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) (HR 3.27, 95% CI 1.66-6.40, p < 0.001). Study population heterogeneity, over-representation of EGFR-mutated patients, and heterogeneous treatment types might limit the conclusions of this study, which require future validation in independent populations.
In this study of patients with newly diagnosed NSCLC, we found that ctDNA detection using targeted NGS was associated with poor prognosis. The heterogeneity of lung cancer molecular alterations, particularly at time of progression, impairs the ability of individual gene testing to accurately detect ctDNA in unselected patients. Further investigations are needed to evaluate the clinical impact of earlier evaluation times at 1 or 2 wk. Supporting clinical decisions, such as early treatment switching based on ctDNA positivity at first evaluation, will require dedicated interventional studies.
循环肿瘤DNA(ctDNA)是一种已获认可的非侵入性生物标志物,用于检测肺癌诊断或复发时表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变的存在情况。然而,评估ctDNA作为一种非侵入性“实时”生物标志物在治疗监测中提供预后和预测信息的研究结果并不一致,主要原因是方法上的差异。我们最近验证了一种用于检测ctDNA的新一代测序(NGS)方法。利用这种新方法,我们在一组非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的前瞻性观察系列中评估了ctDNA监测的临床实用性。
我们招募了124例新诊断的晚期NSCLC患者进行ctDNA监测。主要目的是分析基线ctDNA对总生存期的预后价值。使用我们专门的变异检测算法,通过超深度靶向NGS评估ctDNA。常见突变通过数字PCR进行验证。在109例至少有一个随访标记突变的患者中,血浆样本在基线时(n = 105)、首次评估时(n = 85)和肿瘤进展时(n = 66)均有贡献。我们发现,基线时ctDNA的存在是预后不良的独立标志物,总生存期的中位数分别为13.6个月和21.5个月(调整后风险比[HR] 1.82,95%置信区间1.01 - 3.55,p = 0.045),无进展生存期的中位数分别为4.9个月和10.4个月(调整后HR 2.14,95%置信区间1.30 - 3.67,p = 0.002)。它还与骨和肝转移的存在有关。在开始治疗后的首次评估(E1)时,根据最佳放射学反应和无进展生存期判断,残留ctDNA是治疗获益的早期预测指标。最后,E1时ctDNA阴性与总生存期相关,独立于实体瘤疗效评价标准(RECIST)(HR 3.27,95%置信区间1.66 - 6.40,p < 0.001)。研究人群的异质性、EGFR突变患者的过度代表性以及治疗类型的异质性可能会限制本研究的结论,这些结论需要在独立人群中进行未来验证。
在这项针对新诊断NSCLC患者的研究中,我们发现使用靶向NGS检测ctDNA与预后不良相关。肺癌分子改变的异质性,尤其是在进展期,损害了个体基因检测在未选择患者中准确检测ctDNA的能力。需要进一步研究来评估在1或2周时更早评估时间的临床影响。支持临床决策,如基于首次评估时ctDNA阳性进行早期治疗转换,将需要专门的干预性研究。