Suppr超能文献

系统评价和网络荟萃分析:新辅助治疗联合手术治疗可切除食管鳞癌患者的效果。

A systematic review and network meta-analysis of neoadjuvant therapy combined with surgery for patients with resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Shantou University Medical College, No.22 Xinling Road, Shantou, Guangdong, 515041, China.

School of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.

出版信息

Int J Surg. 2017 Feb;38:41-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.12.035. Epub 2016 Dec 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The role of neoadjuvant therapy combined with surgery for treating esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains controversial. We performed a network meta-analysis to synthesize direct and indirect evidence to identify the optimal therapeutic method for ESCC.

METHODS

We identified 15 randomized controlled trials that compared any of the following 4 therapeutic measures: surgery alone (S), preoperative chemotherapy followed by surgery (CTS), preoperative radiotherapy followed by surgery (RTS), and preoperative chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery (CRTS). The main outcomes were 5-year survival, rate of radical resection, operative mortality and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Network meta-analysis showed that CRTS was associated with improved survival as compared with S (OR = 1.50 [95% CI 1.21 to 1.97]) and decreased occurrence of complications as compared with RTS (OR = 0.50 [95% CI 0.22 to 0.99]). Direct evidence revealed CRTS associated with improved survival (OR = 1.61 [95% CI 1.01 to 2.57]) and radical resection (OR = 4.01 [95% CI 1.66 to 9.69]) as compared with S. In terms of radical resection, CTS was more effective than S (OR = 1.73 [95% CI 1.09 to 2.76]). Findings for CTS and RTS did not differ for 5-year survival, operative mortality and postoperative complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, CRTS might be the best choice for resectable ESCC because it could increase the radical resection rate and lower the occurrence of complications, thereby prolonging survival time.

摘要

背景

新辅助治疗联合手术治疗食管鳞癌(ESCC)的作用仍存在争议。我们进行了一项网状荟萃分析,综合直接和间接证据,以确定 ESCC 的最佳治疗方法。

方法

我们确定了 15 项比较以下 4 种治疗措施的随机对照试验:单纯手术(S)、术前化疗后手术(CTS)、术前放疗后手术(RTS)和术前放化疗后手术(CRTS)。主要结局是 5 年生存率、根治性切除率、手术死亡率和术后并发症。

结果

网状荟萃分析显示,与 S 相比,CRTS 可提高生存率(OR=1.50 [95%CI 1.21 至 1.97]),降低与 RTS 相关的并发症发生率(OR=0.50 [95%CI 0.22 至 0.99])。直接证据显示,与 S 相比,CRTS 可提高生存率(OR=1.61 [95%CI 1.01 至 2.57])和根治性切除率(OR=4.01 [95%CI 1.66 至 9.69])。在根治性切除方面,CTS 比 S 更有效(OR=1.73 [95%CI 1.09 至 2.76])。CTS 和 RTS 在 5 年生存率、手术死亡率和术后并发症方面的疗效无差异。

结论

总的来说,CRTS 可能是可切除 ESCC 的最佳选择,因为它可以提高根治性切除率,降低并发症发生率,从而延长生存时间。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验