• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

系统评价和网络荟萃分析:新辅助治疗联合手术治疗可切除食管鳞癌患者的效果。

A systematic review and network meta-analysis of neoadjuvant therapy combined with surgery for patients with resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Shantou University Medical College, No.22 Xinling Road, Shantou, Guangdong, 515041, China.

School of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.

出版信息

Int J Surg. 2017 Feb;38:41-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.12.035. Epub 2016 Dec 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.12.035
PMID:28027995
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The role of neoadjuvant therapy combined with surgery for treating esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains controversial. We performed a network meta-analysis to synthesize direct and indirect evidence to identify the optimal therapeutic method for ESCC.

METHODS

We identified 15 randomized controlled trials that compared any of the following 4 therapeutic measures: surgery alone (S), preoperative chemotherapy followed by surgery (CTS), preoperative radiotherapy followed by surgery (RTS), and preoperative chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery (CRTS). The main outcomes were 5-year survival, rate of radical resection, operative mortality and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Network meta-analysis showed that CRTS was associated with improved survival as compared with S (OR = 1.50 [95% CI 1.21 to 1.97]) and decreased occurrence of complications as compared with RTS (OR = 0.50 [95% CI 0.22 to 0.99]). Direct evidence revealed CRTS associated with improved survival (OR = 1.61 [95% CI 1.01 to 2.57]) and radical resection (OR = 4.01 [95% CI 1.66 to 9.69]) as compared with S. In terms of radical resection, CTS was more effective than S (OR = 1.73 [95% CI 1.09 to 2.76]). Findings for CTS and RTS did not differ for 5-year survival, operative mortality and postoperative complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, CRTS might be the best choice for resectable ESCC because it could increase the radical resection rate and lower the occurrence of complications, thereby prolonging survival time.

摘要

背景

新辅助治疗联合手术治疗食管鳞癌(ESCC)的作用仍存在争议。我们进行了一项网状荟萃分析,综合直接和间接证据,以确定 ESCC 的最佳治疗方法。

方法

我们确定了 15 项比较以下 4 种治疗措施的随机对照试验:单纯手术(S)、术前化疗后手术(CTS)、术前放疗后手术(RTS)和术前放化疗后手术(CRTS)。主要结局是 5 年生存率、根治性切除率、手术死亡率和术后并发症。

结果

网状荟萃分析显示,与 S 相比,CRTS 可提高生存率(OR=1.50 [95%CI 1.21 至 1.97]),降低与 RTS 相关的并发症发生率(OR=0.50 [95%CI 0.22 至 0.99])。直接证据显示,与 S 相比,CRTS 可提高生存率(OR=1.61 [95%CI 1.01 至 2.57])和根治性切除率(OR=4.01 [95%CI 1.66 至 9.69])。在根治性切除方面,CTS 比 S 更有效(OR=1.73 [95%CI 1.09 至 2.76])。CTS 和 RTS 在 5 年生存率、手术死亡率和术后并发症方面的疗效无差异。

结论

总的来说,CRTS 可能是可切除 ESCC 的最佳选择,因为它可以提高根治性切除率,降低并发症发生率,从而延长生存时间。

相似文献

1
A systematic review and network meta-analysis of neoadjuvant therapy combined with surgery for patients with resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.系统评价和网络荟萃分析:新辅助治疗联合手术治疗可切除食管鳞癌患者的效果。
Int J Surg. 2017 Feb;38:41-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.12.035. Epub 2016 Dec 24.
2
Neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy for resectable esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.可切除食管癌的新辅助或辅助治疗:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Med. 2004 Sep 24;2:35. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-2-35.
3
Chemoradiotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy plus surgery for esophageal cancer.食管癌的化疗放疗与化疗放疗联合手术治疗对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 22;8(8):CD010511. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010511.pub2.
4
Preoperative chemotherapy for resectable thoracic esophageal cancer.可切除胸段食管癌的术前化疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001(1):CD001556. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001556.
5
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy? A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of the options for neoadjuvant therapy for treating oesophageal cancer.新辅助放化疗还是化疗?食管癌新辅助治疗方案的全面系统评价与荟萃分析。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Mar 1;51(3):421-431. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezw315.
6
Surgery within multimodal therapy concepts for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC): the MRI approach and review of the literature.多模态治疗概念下的食管鳞癌(ESCC)手术:MRI 方法及文献复习。
Adv Med Sci. 2009;54(2):158-69. doi: 10.2478/v10039-009-0044-1.
7
Preoperative chemotherapy for resectable thoracic esophageal cancer.可切除胸段食管癌的术前化疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003(4):CD001556. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001556.
8
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
9
Comparison of neoadjuvant treatment and surgery first for resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic carcinoma: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.新辅助治疗与手术优先治疗可切除或交界可切除胰腺癌的比较:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 7;19(3):e0295983. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295983. eCollection 2024.
10
Ablative and non-surgical therapies for early and very early hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.早期和极早期肝细胞癌的消融和非手术治疗:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2023 Dec;27(29):1-172. doi: 10.3310/GK5221.

引用本文的文献

1
Number of Examined Lymph Nodes in the Highest Quartile Enhances Staging and Prognosis for Patients with Esophageal Cancer Receiving Neoadjuvant Therapy.最高四分位数的检查淋巴结数量可改善接受新辅助治疗的食管癌患者的分期和预后。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Sep 10. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-18237-1.
2
The scheme, and regulative mechanism of pyroptosis, ferroptosis, and necroptosis in radiation injury.辐射损伤中细胞焦亡、铁死亡和坏死性凋亡的发生机制及调控。
Int J Biol Sci. 2024 Mar 3;20(5):1871-1883. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.91112. eCollection 2024.
3
Increased resected lymph node stations improved survival of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
增加切除的淋巴结站数可提高食管鳞状细胞癌的生存率。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Feb 5;24(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-11886-7.
4
Treatment options for neoadjuvant strategies of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (Review).食管鳞状细胞癌新辅助治疗策略的治疗选择(综述)
Mol Clin Oncol. 2023 Nov 20;20(1):4. doi: 10.3892/mco.2023.2702. eCollection 2024 Jan.
5
Individual Participant Data Network Meta-Analysis of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy or Chemoradiotherapy in Esophageal or Gastroesophageal Junction Carcinoma.个体参与者数据网络荟萃分析新辅助化疗或放化疗治疗食管或胃食管交界处癌。
J Clin Oncol. 2023 Oct 1;41(28):4535-4547. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.02279. Epub 2023 Jul 12.
6
Comparison of different neoadjuvant treatments for resectable locoregional esophageal cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.比较可切除局部区域性食管癌的不同新辅助治疗方法:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Thorac Cancer. 2022 Sep;13(17):2515-2523. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.14588. Epub 2022 Jul 26.
7
[Development and validation of a prognostic model based on SEER data for patients with esophageal carcinoma after esophagectomy].[基于监测、流行病学与最终结果(SEER)数据的食管癌切除术后患者预后模型的开发与验证]
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2022 Jun 20;42(6):794-804. doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2022.06.02.
8
Effectiveness and Safety of Targeted Agents Combined With Chemoradiotherapy for the Treatment of Esophageal Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis.靶向药物联合放化疗治疗食管癌的有效性和安全性:一项网状Meta分析
Front Oncol. 2021 Nov 29;11:621917. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.621917. eCollection 2021.
9
Survival of Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Therapy Compared With Surgery Alone for Resectable Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systemic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.新辅助和辅助治疗与单纯手术治疗可切除食管鳞状细胞癌的生存率比较:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
Front Oncol. 2021 Oct 20;11:728185. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.728185. eCollection 2021.
10
A network meta-analysis for neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatments for resectable squamous cell carcinoma of esophagus.针对可切除食管鳞癌的新辅助和辅助治疗的网状荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 24;11(1):6800. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86102-8.