Pureswaran Deepa S, Johns Rob, Heard Stephen B, Quiring Dan
Canadian Forest Service, Natural Resources Canada, Quebec City, QC, G1V 4C7, Canada (
Canadian Forest Service, Natural Resources Canada, Fredericton, NB, Canada (
Environ Entomol. 2016 Dec;45(6):1333-1342. doi: 10.1093/ee/nvw103. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
Three main hypotheses have been postulated over the past century to explain the outbreaking population dynamics of eastern spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Clemens). The Silviculture Hypothesis first arose in the 1920s, with the idea that outbreaks were driven by forestry practices favoring susceptible softwood species. In the 1960s, it was proposed that populations were governed by Multiple Equilibria, with warm weather conditions releasing low-density populations from the regulatory control of natural enemies. Dispersal from outbreak foci, or "epicenters," was seen as causing widespread outbreaks that eventually collapsed following resource depletion. However, in the 1980s, following the re-analysis of data from the 1940s outbreak in New Brunswick, this interpretation was challenged. The alternative Oscillatory Hypothesis proposed that budworm population dynamics were governed by a second-order density-dependent process, with oscillations being driven by natural enemy-victim interactions. Under this hypothesis, weather and resource availability contribute to secondary fluctuations around the main oscillation, and weather and moth dispersal serve to synchronize population cycles regionally. Intensive, independent population studies during the peak and declining phases of the 1980s outbreak supported the principal tenet of the Oscillatory Hypothesis, but concluded that host plant quality played a more important role than this hypothesis proposed. More recent research on the early phase of spruce budworm cycles suggests that mate-finding and natural-enemy-driven Allee effects in low-density populations might be overcome by immigration of moths, which can facilitate the onset of outbreaks. Even more recent research has supported components of all three hypotheses attempting to explain spruce budworm dynamics. In the midst of a new rising outbreak (2006-present), we discuss the evolution of debates surrounding these hypotheses from a historic perspective, examine gaps in current knowledge, and suggest avenues for future research (e.g., intensive studies on low-density populations) to better understand and manage spruce budworm populations.
在过去的一个世纪里,人们提出了三种主要假说,以解释东部云杉芽虫(Choristoneura fumiferana (Clemens))种群爆发式的动态变化。造林假说最早出现在20世纪20年代,其观点是,森林经营活动有利于易感软木树种,从而引发了虫害爆发。20世纪60年代,有人提出种群受多重平衡的制约,温暖的天气条件使低密度种群摆脱了天敌的调控。从爆发中心或“震中”扩散被视为导致广泛的虫害爆发,最终在资源枯竭后崩溃。然而,在20世纪80年代,对新不伦瑞克省20世纪40年代虫害爆发数据的重新分析对这一解释提出了挑战。另一种振荡假说提出,芽虫种群动态受二阶密度依赖过程的制约,振荡由天敌与猎物的相互作用驱动。在这一假说下,天气和资源可用性导致了围绕主要振荡的二次波动,而天气和蛾类扩散则使区域内的种群周期同步。在20世纪80年代虫害爆发的高峰期和衰退期进行的密集、独立的种群研究支持了振荡假说的主要原则,但得出的结论是,寄主植物质量所起的作用比该假说所提出的更为重要。最近对云杉芽虫周期早期阶段的研究表明,低密度种群中蛾类的迁移可能会克服寻找配偶和天敌驱动的阿利效应,这有助于虫害爆发的开始。甚至最近的研究也支持了试图解释云杉芽虫动态的所有三种假说的组成部分。在新一轮虫害爆发(2006年至今)的过程中,我们从历史的角度讨论了围绕这些假说的争论的演变,审视了当前知识的空白,并提出了未来研究的方向(例如,对低密度种群的深入研究),以更好地理解和管理云杉芽虫种群。