• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

认知训练对老年人主观幸福感的影响。

The effect of cognitive training on the subjective perception of well-being in older adults.

作者信息

Bureš Vladimír, Čech Pavel, Mikulecká Jaroslava, Ponce Daniela, Kuca Kamil

机构信息

Faculty of Informatics and Management, University of Hradec Kralove , Hradec Kralove , Czech Republic.

Faculty of Informatics and Management, University of Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic; Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.

出版信息

PeerJ. 2016 Dec 21;4:e2785. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2785. eCollection 2016.

DOI:10.7717/peerj.2785
PMID:28028465
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5180580/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is a growing number of studies indicating the major consequences of the subjective perception of well-being on mental health and healthcare use. However, most of the cognitive training research focuses more on the preservation of cognitive function than on the implications of the state of well-being. This secondary analysis of data from a randomised controlled trial investigated the effects of individualised television-based cognitive training on self-rated well-being using the WHO-5 index while considering gender and education as influencing factors. The effects of cognitive training were compared with leisure activities that the elderly could be engaged in to pass time.

METHODS

Cognitively healthy participants aged 60 years or above screened using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Major Depression Inventory (MDI) were randomly allocated to a cognitive training group or to an active control group in a single-blind controlled two-group design and underwent 24 training sessions. Data acquired from the WHO-5 questionnaire administered before and after intervention were statistically analysed using a mixed design model for repeated measures. The effect of individualised cognitive training was compared with leisure activities while the impact of gender and education was explored using estimated marginal means.

RESULTS

A total of 81 participants aged 67.9 ± 5.59 [60-84] without cognitive impairments and absent of depression symptoms underwent the study. Participants with leisure time activities declared significantly higher scores compared to participants with cognitive training  = 73.48 ± 2.88, 95% CI [67.74-79.22] vs  = 64.13 ± 3.034, 95% CI [58.09-70.17] WHO-5 score. Gender and education were found to moderate the effect of cognitive training on well-being when compared to leisure activities. Females engaged in leisure activities in the control group reported higher by  = 9.77 ± 5.4, 95% CI [-0.99-20.54] WHO-5 scores than females with the cognitive training regimen. Participants with high school education declared leisure activities to increase WHO-5 scores by  = 14.59 ± 5.39, 95% CI [3.85-25.34] compared to individualised cognitive training.

DISCUSSION

The findings revealed that individualised cognitive training was not directly associated with improvements in well-being. Changes in the control group indicated that involvement in leisure time activities, in which participants were partly free to choose from, represented more favourable stimulation to a self-perceived sense of well-being than individualised cognitive training. Results also supported the fact that gender and education moderated the effect of cognitive training on well-being. Females and participants with high school education were found to be negatively impacted in well-being when performance connected with cognitive training was expected.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce2f/5180580/6faafbb6d872/peerj-04-2785-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce2f/5180580/0a7aeb964419/peerj-04-2785-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce2f/5180580/9032d4ae6e68/peerj-04-2785-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce2f/5180580/2ddc4b109232/peerj-04-2785-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce2f/5180580/855b60dbeb75/peerj-04-2785-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce2f/5180580/5519547279fe/peerj-04-2785-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce2f/5180580/6faafbb6d872/peerj-04-2785-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce2f/5180580/0a7aeb964419/peerj-04-2785-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce2f/5180580/9032d4ae6e68/peerj-04-2785-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce2f/5180580/2ddc4b109232/peerj-04-2785-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce2f/5180580/855b60dbeb75/peerj-04-2785-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce2f/5180580/5519547279fe/peerj-04-2785-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce2f/5180580/6faafbb6d872/peerj-04-2785-g006.jpg
摘要

背景

越来越多的研究表明,主观幸福感对心理健康和医疗保健利用具有重大影响。然而,大多数认知训练研究更多地关注认知功能的保存,而非幸福感状态的影响。这项对随机对照试验数据的二次分析,使用世界卫生组织-5指数(WHO-5指数),在将性别和教育作为影响因素的情况下,研究了基于电视的个性化认知训练对自评幸福感的影响。将认知训练的效果与老年人可以参与的休闲活动进行了比较。

方法

使用简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)和重度抑郁量表(MDI)筛选出60岁及以上认知健康的参与者,采用单盲对照两组设计将其随机分配到认知训练组或积极对照组,并接受24次训练课程。对干预前后通过WHO-5问卷获得的数据,使用重复测量的混合设计模型进行统计分析。将个性化认知训练的效果与休闲活动进行比较,同时使用估计边际均值探讨性别和教育的影响。

结果

共有81名年龄为67.9±5.59岁[60 - 84岁]、无认知障碍且无抑郁症状的参与者进行了该研究。与接受认知训练的参与者相比,参与休闲活动的参与者WHO-5得分显著更高(分别为73.48±2.88,95%置信区间[67.74 - 79.22]和64.13±3.034,95%置信区间[58.09 - 70.17])。与休闲活动相比,发现性别和教育会调节认知训练对幸福感的影响。对照组中参与休闲活动的女性报告的WHO-5得分比接受认知训练方案的女性高(9.77±5.4,95%置信区间[-0.99 - 20.54])。与个性化认知训练相比,高中教育程度的参与者表示休闲活动使WHO-5得分提高(14.59±5.39,95%置信区间[3.85 - 25.34])。

讨论

研究结果表明,个性化认知训练与幸福感的改善没有直接关联。对照组的变化表明,参与休闲活动(参与者在一定程度上可自由选择)对自我感知的幸福感而言,比个性化认知训练更具积极刺激作用。结果还支持了性别和教育调节认知训练对幸福感影响这一事实。当预期表现与认知训练相关时,发现女性和高中教育程度的参与者在幸福感方面受到负面影响。

相似文献

1
The effect of cognitive training on the subjective perception of well-being in older adults.认知训练对老年人主观幸福感的影响。
PeerJ. 2016 Dec 21;4:e2785. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2785. eCollection 2016.
2
Rationale and protocol of the ENGAGE study: a double-blind randomized controlled preference trial using a comprehensive cohort design to measure the effect of a cognitive and leisure-based intervention in older adults with a memory complaint.ENGAGE 研究的原理和方案:一项采用综合队列设计的双盲随机对照偏好试验,旨在测量认知和休闲为基础的干预对有记忆主诉的老年人的影响。
Trials. 2019 May 22;20(1):282. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3250-6.
3
Erratum.勘误
Mult Scler. 2016 Oct;22(12):NP9-NP11. doi: 10.1177/1352458515585718. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
4
5
6
Effects of golf training on cognition in older adults: a randomised controlled trial.高尔夫训练对老年人认知能力的影响:一项随机对照试验。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2018 Oct;72(10):944-950. doi: 10.1136/jech-2017-210052. Epub 2018 Jun 23.
7
Relationship between education, leisure activities, and cognitive functions in older adults.老年人的教育、休闲活动与认知功能之间的关系。
Aging Ment Health. 2019 Dec;23(12):1651-1660. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2018.1512083. Epub 2018 Oct 23.
8
Group task-specific circuit training for patients discharged home after stroke may be as effective as individualised physiotherapy in improving mobility.群组任务特定的针对中风出院回家患者的康复训练可能与个体化物理治疗同样有效,可以改善患者的活动能力。
J Physiother. 2012;58(4):269. doi: 10.1016/S1836-9553(12)70129-7.
9
The influence of computer-based cognitive flexibility training on subjective cognitive well-being after stroke: A multi-center randomized controlled trial.基于计算机的认知灵活性训练对脑卒中后主观认知幸福感的影响:一项多中心随机对照试验。
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 16;12(11):e0187582. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187582. eCollection 2017.
10
Folic acid with or without vitamin B12 for cognition and dementia.叶酸联合或不联合维生素B12对认知及痴呆的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003(4):CD004514. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004514.

引用本文的文献

1
Feasibility and acceptability of a remote computerized cognitive training employing telehealth in older adults with subjective cognitive complaints.采用远程医疗对有主观认知主诉的老年人进行远程计算机化认知训练的可行性和可接受性。
Digit Health. 2025 Mar 25;11:20552076251324015. doi: 10.1177/20552076251324015. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
The impact of learning engagement on the subjective well-being of disadvantaged older adults in China.学习投入对中国处境不利的老年群体主观幸福感的影响。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jul 18;11:1196692. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1196692. eCollection 2023.
3
Perceptions of Cognitive Training Games and Assessment Technologies for Dementia: Acceptability Study With Patient and Public Involvement Workshops.

本文引用的文献

1
European perspectives on quality of life in old age.欧洲对老年生活质量的看法。
Eur J Ageing. 2009 Jun 3;6(2):61-66. doi: 10.1007/s10433-009-0117-9. eCollection 2009 Jun.
2
The Impact of Social and Cultural Engagement and Dieting on Well-Being and Resilience in a Group of Residents in the Metropolitan Area of Naples.社会文化参与和节食对那不勒斯大都市区一组居民幸福感和恢复力的影响
J Aging Res. 2016;2016:4768420. doi: 10.1155/2016/4768420. Epub 2016 May 19.
3
The relationship between yoga involvement, mindfulness and psychological well-being.
痴呆症认知训练游戏与评估技术的认知:患者及公众参与研讨会的可接受性研究
JMIR Serious Games. 2022 Jun 20;10(2):e32489. doi: 10.2196/32489.
4
Computerised cognitive training for 12 or more weeks for maintaining cognitive function in cognitively healthy people in late life.针对认知健康的老年人进行12周或更长时间的计算机化认知训练以维持其认知功能。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Feb 27;2(2):CD012277. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012277.pub3.
5
Computerised cognitive training for preventing dementia in people with mild cognitive impairment.计算机化认知训练对预防轻度认知障碍患者痴呆症的作用
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Mar 13;3(3):CD012279. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012279.pub2.
6
Computerised cognitive training for maintaining cognitive function in cognitively healthy people in midlife.用于维持中年认知健康人群认知功能的计算机化认知训练。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Mar 13;3(3):CD012278. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012278.pub2.
7
Computerised cognitive training for maintaining cognitive function in cognitively healthy people in late life.计算机化认知训练对维持老年人认知健康人群的认知功能的作用
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Mar 13;3(3):CD012277. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012277.pub2.
8
Interventions for subjective cognitive decline: systematic review and meta-analysis.主观认知衰退的干预措施:系统评价与荟萃分析
BMJ Open. 2018 Jul 19;8(7):e021610. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021610.
9
Actual Conditions of Leisure Activity Among Older Community-Dwelling Japanese Adults.日本社区居住老年成年人休闲活动的实际状况。
Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2018 Jun 13;4:2333721418781677. doi: 10.1177/2333721418781677. eCollection 2018 Jan-Dec.
瑜伽参与、正念与心理健康之间的关系。
Complement Ther Med. 2016 Jun;26:123-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2016.03.011. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
4
A randomized controlled trial of two simple mind-body programs, Kirtan Kriya meditation and music listening, for adults with subjective cognitive decline: Feasibility and acceptability.一项针对主观认知能力下降的成年人的两种简单身心疗法——克irtan Kriya冥想和音乐聆听的随机对照试验:可行性和可接受性。
Complement Ther Med. 2016 Jun;26:98-107. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2016.03.002. Epub 2016 Mar 5.
5
Cognitive Aging and Time Perception: Roles of Bayesian Optimization and Degeneracy.认知衰老与时间感知:贝叶斯优化与简并性的作用
Front Aging Neurosci. 2016 May 18;8:102. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2016.00102. eCollection 2016.
6
Running to well-being: A comparative study on the impact of exercise on the physical and mental health of law and psychology students.跑步通向健康:关于运动对法律专业和心理学专业学生身心健康影响的比较研究
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2016 Sep-Dec;49(Pt A):66-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2016.05.012. Epub 2016 May 27.
7
The optimal timing of stimulation to induce long-lasting positive effects on episodic memory in physiological aging.在生理性衰老过程中,为对情景记忆产生持久积极影响而进行刺激的最佳时机。
Behav Brain Res. 2016 Sep 15;311:81-86. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2016.05.028. Epub 2016 May 13.
8
Healthy cognitive aging and dementia prevention.健康的认知老化与痴呆预防。
Am Psychol. 2016 May-Jun;71(4):268-75. doi: 10.1037/a0040250.
9
A pilot study on the benefit of cognitive rehabilitation in Parkinson's disease.一项关于帕金森病认知康复益处的试点研究。
Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2016 May;9(3):153-64. doi: 10.1177/1756285616628765. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
10
Focused and divided attention in a simulated cocktail-party situation: ERP evidence from younger and older adults.模拟鸡尾酒会情境下的集中注意力和分散注意力:来自年轻人和老年人的事件相关电位证据。
Neurobiol Aging. 2016 May;41:138-149. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2016.02.018. Epub 2016 Mar 3.