From the Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China (F.Z., C.D.G., S.K.N., A.L.); and Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China (M.J.U.).
Anesthesiology. 2015 Apr;122(4):832-40. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000589.
Adaptive support ventilation can speed weaning after coronary artery surgery compared with protocolized weaning using other modes. There are no data to support this mode of weaning after cardiac valvular surgery. Furthermore, control group weaning times have been long, suggesting that the results may reflect control group protocols that delay weaning rather than a real advantage of adaptive support ventilation.
Randomized (computer-generated sequence and sealed opaque envelopes), parallel-arm, unblinded trial of adaptive support ventilation versus physician-directed weaning after adult fast-track cardiac valvular surgery. The primary outcome was duration of mechanical ventilation. Patients aged 18 to 80 yr without significant renal, liver, or lung disease or severe impairment of left ventricular function undergoing uncomplicated elective valve surgery were eligible. Care was standardized, except postoperative ventilation. In the adaptive support ventilation group, target minute ventilation and inspired oxygen concentration were adjusted according to blood gases. A spontaneous breathing trial was carried out when the total inspiratory pressure of 15 cm H2O or less with positive end-expiratory pressure of 5 cm H2O. In the control group, the duty physician made all ventilatory decisions.
Median duration of ventilation was statistically significantly shorter (P = 0.013) in the adaptive support ventilation group (205 [141 to 295] min, n = 30) than that in controls (342 [214 to 491] min, n = 31). Manual ventilator changes and alarms were less common in the adaptive support ventilation group, and arterial blood gas estimations were more common.
Adaptive support ventilation reduces ventilation time by more than 2 h in patients who have undergone fast-track cardiac valvular surgery while reducing the number of manual ventilator changes and alarms.
与使用其他模式的程序化脱机相比,适应性支持通气可以加快冠状动脉手术后的脱机速度。目前尚无数据支持这种心脏瓣膜手术后的脱机模式。此外,对照组的脱机时间较长,这表明结果可能反映了对照组的方案延迟了脱机,而不是适应性支持通气的真正优势。
成人快速通道心脏瓣膜手术后,适应性支持通气与医生指导脱机的随机(计算机生成序列和密封不透明信封)、平行臂、非盲试验。主要结局是机械通气的持续时间。年龄在 18 至 80 岁之间、无明显肾、肝或肺疾病或严重左心室功能障碍的患者,接受单纯择期瓣膜手术的患者符合条件。护理标准化,除术后通气外。在适应性支持通气组中,根据血气调整目标分钟通气量和吸入氧浓度。当 15cmH2O 或以下的总吸气压力和 5cmH2O 的呼气末正压时,进行自主呼吸试验。在对照组中,主治医生做出所有通气决策。
适应性支持通气组(205[141 至 295]分钟,n=30)的通气时间明显短于对照组(342[214 至 491]分钟,n=31)(P=0.013)。适应性支持通气组手动呼吸机变化和报警较少,动脉血气估计更常见。
在接受快速通道心脏瓣膜手术的患者中,适应性支持通气可将通气时间缩短 2 小时以上,同时减少手动呼吸机的变化和报警次数。