Suppr超能文献

用于回输纵隔引流血的硬壳式心内直视手术贮血器。

Hard-shell cardiotomy reservoir for reinfusion of shed mediastinal blood.

作者信息

Page R, Russell G N, Fox M A, Fabri B M, Lewis I, Williets T

机构信息

Regional Adult Cardiothoracic Unit, Broadgreen Hospital, Liverpool, England.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 1989 Oct;48(4):514-7. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)66852-x.

Abstract

We conducted a prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing homologous blood consumption between groups of patients receiving conventional mediastinal drainage (group 1) or reinfusion of shed mediastinal blood (group 2) using hard-shell cardiotomy reservoir. One hundred consecutive patients who had elective coronary artery or valvular operations were studied. The two groups were comparable with regard to age, sex, weight, preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin levels, and surgical procedure. Group 2 patients had their shed mediastinal blood reinfused for up to 18 hours postoperatively; otherwise, the two groups were treated identically. For groups 1 and 2, average mediastinal blood losses were 705 +/- 522 and 822 +/- 445 mL and homologous blood consumption was 3.83 +/- 2.58 and 3.15 +/- 2.05 U, respectively (neither measure was significantly different). However, if blood losses exceeded 500 mL, there was a statistically significant reduction in homologous blood requirements in group 2 as compared with matched controls in group 1. This difference was most significant in patients with the greatest mediastinal losses.

摘要

我们进行了一项前瞻性、随机、对照试验,比较了使用硬壳心脏切开储血器的两组患者的同种异体血消耗量,一组接受传统纵隔引流(第1组),另一组接受纵隔引流血回输(第2组)。对连续100例行择期冠状动脉或瓣膜手术的患者进行了研究。两组在年龄、性别、体重、术前和术后血红蛋白水平以及手术方式方面具有可比性。第2组患者术后长达18小时接受纵隔引流血回输;否则,两组治疗方式相同。第1组和第2组的平均纵隔失血量分别为705±522和822±445 mL,同种异体血消耗量分别为3.83±2.58和3.15±2.05 U(两项指标均无显著差异)。然而,如果失血量超过500 mL,与第1组匹配的对照组相比,第2组的同种异体血需求量有统计学意义的减少。这种差异在纵隔失血量最大的患者中最为显著。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验