Savarese Gianluigi, Hage Camilla, Orsini Nicola, Dahlström Ulf, Perrone-Filardi Pasquale, Rosano Giuseppe M C, Lund Lars H
From the Department of Medicine (G.S., C.H., L.H.L.) and Department of Public Health Sciences (N.O.), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Cardiology (U.D.) and Department of Medical and Health Sciences (U.D.), Linkoping University, Sweden; Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Federico II University, Naples, Italy (P.P.-F.); Cardiovascular and Cell Sciences Research Institute, St George's University, London, UK (G.M.C.R.); and IRCCS San Raffaele Pisana, Rome, Italy (G.M.C.R.).
Circ Heart Fail. 2016 Nov;9(11). doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.116.003105.
In heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF) and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), feasible surrogate end points are needed for phase II trials. The aim was to assess whether a reduction in N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) is associated with improved mortality/morbidity in an unselected population of HFmrEF and HFpEF patients.
In the Swedish Heart Failure Registry, HFmrEF (EF=40%-49%) and HFpEF (EF≥50%) patients reporting at least 2 consecutive outpatient NT-proBNP assessments were prospectively studied. Associations between reduction in NT-proBNP and overall mortality, HF hospitalization, and their composite were assessed by multivariable Cox regressions, with NT-proBNP changes modeled as binary (decrease/increase) or quantitative predictor by restricted cubic splines. In 650 patients, at a median of 7 months between the 2 measurements of NT-proBNP and over a median follow-up of 1.65 years, 361 patients (55%) showed a reduction and 289 patients (45%) an increase in NT-proBNP. Change in NT-proBNP was associated with risk of outcomes. Fifty-seven patients (16%) who decreased their NT-proBNP versus 78 patients (27%) who increased it died from any cause (adjusted hazard ratio=0.53; 95% confidence interval=0.36-0.77), 61 (17%) versus 86 (30%) were hospitalized for HF (hazard ratio=0.41; 95% confidence interval=0.29-0.60), and 96 (27%) versus 125 (43%) reported the composite outcome (hazard ratio=0.46; 95% confidence interval=0.34-0.62). These findings were replicated in HFmrEF and HFpEF separately.
In HFmrEF and HFpEF during routine care, decreases in NT-proBNP were associated with improved mortality and morbidity. Studies to determine whether NT-proBNP changes in response to therapy predict drug efficacy are needed.
在射血分数处于中间范围的心衰(HFmrEF)和射血分数保留的心衰(HFpEF)患者中,II期试验需要可行的替代终点。本研究旨在评估在未经过筛选的HFmrEF和HFpEF患者群体中,N末端B型利钠肽原(NT-proBNP)的降低是否与死亡率/发病率的改善相关。
在瑞典心衰注册研究中,对报告至少连续2次门诊NT-proBNP评估结果的HFmrEF(射血分数[EF]=40%-49%)和HFpEF(EF≥50%)患者进行前瞻性研究。通过多变量Cox回归评估NT-proBNP降低与全因死亡率、心衰住院率及其复合终点之间的关联,NT-proBNP的变化通过二元变量(降低/升高)或受限立方样条函数建模为定量预测因子。在650例患者中,NT-proBNP的两次测量之间的中位数时间为7个月,中位随访时间为1.65年,361例患者(55%)NT-proBNP降低,289例患者(45%)NT-proBNP升高。NT-proBNP的变化与结局风险相关。NT-proBNP降低的57例患者(16%)与升高的78例患者(27%)相比,任何原因导致的死亡(校正风险比=0.53;95%置信区间=0.36-0.77),因心衰住院的患者分别为61例(17%)和86例(30%)(风险比=0.41;95%置信区间=0.29-0.60),报告复合终点的患者分别为96例(27%)和125例(43%)(风险比=0.46;95%置信区间=0.34-0.62)。这些结果在HFmrEF和HFpEF患者中分别得到了验证。
在常规治疗期间的HFmrEF和HFpEF患者中,NT-proBNP的降低与死亡率和发病率的改善相关。需要开展研究以确定NT-proBNP对治疗的反应变化是否可预测药物疗效。