Saffarian Mathew R, Condie Nathan C, Austin Erica A, Mccausland Katie E, Andary Michael T, Sylvain James R, Mull Iian R, Zemper Eric D, Jannausch Mary L
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Michigan State University, 1200 E. Michigan Avenue, Suite 520, East Lansing, Michigan, 48912.
Muscle Nerve. 2017 Sep;56(3):458-462. doi: 10.1002/mus.25543. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
There are many different nerve conduction study (NCS) techniques to study the superficial fibular sensory nerve (SFSN). We present reference distal latency values and comparative data regarding 4 different NCS for the SFSN.
Four different NCS techniques, Spartan technique, Izzo techniques (medial and intermediate dorsal cutaneous branches), and Daube technique, were performed on (114) healthy volunteers. A total of 108 subjects with 164 legs were included.
The mean latency of the Spartan technique was longest (3.9 ± 0.3 ms) while the Daube technique was the shortest (3.6 ± 0.7 ms). The mean amplitude of the Daube technique displayed the highest (15.2 ± 8.2 μV) with the Spartan technique having the lowest (8.7 ± 4.2 μV). Among the absent sensory nerve action potentials (SNAPs), the Spartan technique was absent only twice (1.2%) and the Izzo Medial technique was absent more than the other techniques (2.9%).
All 4 techniques were reliable methods for obtaining the superficial fibular nerve SNAP, present in 95% of individuals. Muscle Nerve 56: 458-462, 2017.
有许多不同的神经传导研究（NCS）技术可用于研究腓浅感觉神经（SFSN）。我们给出了关于SFSN的4种不同NCS的参考远端潜伏期值和比较数据。
对114名健康志愿者进行了4种不同的NCS技术，即斯巴达技术、伊佐技术（内侧和中间背侧皮支）和道布技术。共纳入108名受试者的164条腿。
斯巴达技术的平均潜伏期最长（3.9±0.3毫秒），而道布技术最短（3.6±0.7毫秒）。道布技术的平均波幅最高（15.2±8.2微伏），斯巴达技术最低（8.7±4.2微伏）。在感觉神经动作电位（SNAP）缺失的情况中，斯巴达技术仅出现两次缺失（1.2%），伊佐内侧技术的缺失情况比其他技术更多（2.9%）。
所有4种技术都是获得腓浅神经SNAP的可靠方法，95%的个体可检测到该电位。《肌肉与神经》56: 458 - 462, 2017年。
