Marcondes-Braga Fabiana G, Batista Guilherme L, Gutz Ivano G R, Saldiva Paulo H N, Mangini Sandrigo, Issa Victor S, Ayub-Ferreira Silvia M, Bocchi Edimar A, Pereira Alexandre Costa, Bacal Fernando
Department of Heart Transplant, Heart Institute (InCor), do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil Av. Dr Eneas de Carvalho Aguiar, 44 - 2°. andar.
Chemistry Institute, University of São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil Av.Prof. Lineu Prestes, 748, bloco 12, sala 1270-Cidade Universitária.
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 28;11(12):e0168790. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168790. eCollection 2016.
The identification of new biomarkers of heart failure (HF) could help in its treatment. Previously, our group studied 89 patients with HF and showed that exhaled breath acetone (EBA) is a new noninvasive biomarker of HF diagnosis. However, there is no data about the relevance of EBA as a biomarker of prognosis.
To evaluate whether EBA could give prognostic information in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).
After breath collection and analysis by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and by spectrophotometry, the 89 patients referred before were followed by one year. Study physicians, blind to the results of cardiac biomarker testing, ascertained vital status of each study participant at 12 months.
The composite endpoint death and heart transplantation (HT) were observed in 35 patients (39.3%): 29 patients (32.6%) died and 6 (6.7%) were submitted to HT within 12 months after study enrollment. High levels of EBA (≥3.7μg/L, 50th percentile) were associated with a progressively worse prognosis in 12-month follow-up (log-rank = 11.06, p = 0.001). Concentrations of EBA above 3.7μg/L increased the risk of death or HT in 3.26 times (HR = 3.26, 95%CI = 1.56-6.80, p = 0.002) within 12 months. In a multivariable cox regression model, the independent predictors of all-cause mortality were systolic blood pressure, respiratory rate and EBA levels.
High EBA levels could be associated to poor prognosis in HFrEF patients.
心力衰竭(HF)新生物标志物的鉴定有助于其治疗。此前,我们团队研究了89例HF患者,结果显示呼出气丙酮(EBA)是HF诊断的一种新的非侵入性生物标志物。然而,尚无关于EBA作为预后生物标志物相关性的数据。
评估EBA是否能为射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)患者提供预后信息。
通过气相色谱-质谱联用仪和分光光度法收集并分析呼出气后,对之前纳入的89例患者进行了为期一年的随访。对心脏生物标志物检测结果不知情的研究医生确定了每位研究参与者在12个月时的生命状态。
35例患者(39.3%)出现了死亡和心脏移植(HT)的复合终点事件:29例患者(32.6%)死亡,6例(6.7%)在研究入组后12个月内接受了HT。在12个月的随访中,高水平的EBA(≥3.7μg/L,第50百分位数)与预后逐渐恶化相关(对数秩检验=11.06,p = 0.001)。12个月内,EBA浓度高于3.7μg/L使死亡或HT风险增加3.26倍(HR = 3.26,95%CI = 1.56 - 6.80,p = 0.002)。在多变量Cox回归模型中,全因死亡率的独立预测因素为收缩压、呼吸频率和EBA水平。
HFrEF患者中EBA水平升高可能与预后不良相关。