Evans Abigail T, Peters Ellen, Shoben Abigail B, Meilleur Louise R, Klein Elizabeth G, Tompkins Mary Kate, Romer Daniel, Tusler Martin
Department of Psychology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
College of Public Health, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
Nicotine Tob Res. 2017 Oct 1;19(10):1155-1162. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntw389.
Cigarette graphic-warning labels elicit negative emotion. Research suggests negative emotion drives greater risk perceptions and quit intentions through multiple processes. The present research compares text-only warning effectiveness to that of graphic warnings eliciting more or less negative emotion.
Nationally representative online panels of 736 adult smokers and 469 teen smokers/vulnerable smokers were randomly assigned to view one of three warning types (text-only, text with low-emotion images, or text with high-emotion images) four times over 2 weeks. Participants recorded their emotional reaction to the warnings (measured as arousal), smoking risk perceptions, and quit intentions. Primary analyses used structural equation modeling.
Participants in the high-emotion condition reported greater emotional reaction than text-only participants (bAdult = 0.21; bTeen = 0.27, p's < .004); those in the low-emotion condition reported lower emotional reaction than text-only participants (bAdult = -0.18; bTeen = -0.22, p's < .018). Stronger emotional reaction was associated with increased risk perceptions in both samples (bAdult = 0.66; bTeen = 0.85, p's < .001) and greater quit intentions among adults (bAdult = 1.00, p < .001). Compared to text-only warnings, low-emotion warnings were associated with reduced risk perceptions and quit intentions whereas high-emotion warnings were associated with increased risk perceptions and quit intentions.
Warning labels with images that elicit more negative emotional reaction are associated with increased risk perceptions and quit intentions in adults and teens relative to text-only warnings. However, graphic warnings containing images which evoke little emotional reaction can backfire and reduce risk perceptions and quit intentions versus text-only warnings.
This research is the first to directly manipulate two emotion levels in sets of nine cigarette graphic warning images and compare them with text-only warnings. Among adult and teen smokers, high-emotion graphic warnings were associated with increased risk perceptions and quit intentions versus text-only warnings. Low-emotion graphic warnings backfired and tended to reduce risk perceptions and quit intentions versus text-only warnings. Policy makers should be aware that merely placing images on cigarette packaging is insufficient to increase smokers' risk perceptions and quit intentions. Low-emotion graphic warnings will not necessarily produce desired population-level benefits relative to text-only or high-emotion warnings.
香烟图形警示标签会引发负面情绪。研究表明,负面情绪通过多种过程促使人们提高风险认知并增强戒烟意愿。本研究将纯文字警示的效果与引发或多或少负面情绪的图形警示的效果进行比较。
从全国范围内具有代表性的在线样本中选取736名成年吸烟者和469名青少年吸烟者/易成瘾吸烟者,将他们随机分组,在两周内分四次观看三种警示类型之一(纯文字、带有低情绪图像的文字或带有高情绪图像的文字)。参与者记录他们对警示的情绪反应(以唤醒度衡量)、吸烟风险认知和戒烟意愿。主要分析采用结构方程模型。
高情绪组的参与者报告的情绪反应比纯文字组的参与者更强烈(成年组b = 0.21;青少年组b = 0.27,p值均<0.004);低情绪组的参与者报告的情绪反应比纯文字组的参与者更弱(成年组b = -0.18;青少年组b = -0.22,p值均<0.018)。在两个样本中,更强的情绪反应都与更高的风险认知相关(成年组b = 0.66;青少年组b = 0.85,p值均<0.001),并且在成年人中与更强的戒烟意愿相关(成年组b = 1.00,p<0.001)。与纯文字警示相比,低情绪警示与风险认知和戒烟意愿的降低相关,而高情绪警示与风险认知和戒烟意愿的增加相关。
与纯文字警示相比,带有能引发更多负面情绪反应图像的警示标签,在成年人和青少年中与更高的风险认知和戒烟意愿相关。然而,包含几乎不引发情绪反应图像的图形警示可能适得其反,与纯文字警示相比会降低风险认知和戒烟意愿。
本研究首次在九组香烟图形警示图像中直接操控两种情绪水平,并将其与纯文字警示进行比较。在成年和青少年吸烟者中,与纯文字警示相比,高情绪图形警示与更高的风险认知和戒烟意愿相关。低情绪图形警示适得其反,与纯文字警示相比往往会降低风险认知和戒烟意愿。政策制定者应意识到,仅仅在香烟包装上放置图像不足以提高吸烟者的风险认知和戒烟意愿。相对于纯文字或高情绪警示,低情绪图形警示不一定会产生预期的群体层面的益处。