Suppr超能文献

6:2 氟代端基羧酸和 6:2 氟代端基磺酸的比较肝毒性,两种长链全氟烷酸的氟化替代品,在成年雄性小鼠中的毒性。

Comparative hepatotoxicity of 6:2 fluorotelomer carboxylic acid and 6:2 fluorotelomer sulfonic acid, two fluorinated alternatives to long-chain perfluoroalkyl acids, on adult male mice.

机构信息

Key Laboratory of Animal Ecology and Conservation Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, People's Republic of China.

State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Department of Histology and Embryology, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Arch Toxicol. 2017 Aug;91(8):2909-2919. doi: 10.1007/s00204-016-1917-2. Epub 2016 Dec 28.

Abstract

Due to their structural similarities, 6:2 fluorotelomer sulfonic acid (6:2 FTSA) and 6:2 fluorotelomer carboxylic acid (6:2 FTCA) are often used as alternatives to perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), respectively. With limited health risk data and 6:2 FTSA detection in water and sludge, the toxicity of these chemicals is of growing concern. Here, adult male mice were exposed with 5 mg/kg/day of 6:2 FTCA or 6:2 FTSA for 28 days to investigate their hepatotoxicological effects. In contrast to 6:2 FTCA, 6:2 FTSA was detected at high and very high levels in serum and liver, respectively, demonstrating bioaccumulation potential and slow elimination. Furthermore, 6:2 FTSA induced liver weight increase, inflammation, and necrosis, whereas 6:2 FTCA caused no obvious liver injury, with fewer significantly altered genes detected compared with that of 6:2 FTSA (39 vs. 412). Although PFOA and PFOS commonly activate peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPARα), 6:2 FTSA induced an increase in PPARγ and related proteins, but not in lipid metabolism-related genes such as PPARα. Our results showed that 6:2 FTCA and 6:2 FTSA exhibited weak and moderate hepatotoxicity, respectively, compared with that reported for legacies PFOA and PFOS.

摘要

由于结构相似,6:2 氟代链烷磺酸(6:2 FTSA)和 6:2 氟代链烷羧酸(6:2 FTCA)通常分别用作全氟辛烷磺酸(PFOS)和全氟辛酸(PFOA)的替代品。由于关于这两种化学物质的健康风险数据有限,且在水和污泥中检测到 6:2 FTSA,因此它们的毒性引起了越来越多的关注。在这里,雄性成年小鼠每天暴露于 5mg/kg 的 6:2 FTCA 或 6:2 FTSA 中 28 天,以研究它们的肝毒性作用。与 6:2 FTCA 不同,6:2 FTSA 分别在血清和肝脏中被检测到高水平和非常高水平,表明其具有生物蓄积潜力和缓慢的消除性。此外,6:2 FTSA 引起肝重量增加、炎症和坏死,而 6:2 FTCA 未引起明显的肝损伤,与 6:2 FTSA 相比,其检测到的显著改变的基因较少(39 个与 412 个)。尽管 PFOA 和 PFOS 通常激活过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体 α(PPARα),但 6:2 FTSA 诱导 PPARγ 和相关蛋白增加,但不诱导与脂质代谢相关的基因,如 PPARα。我们的结果表明,与传统的 PFOA 和 PFOS 相比,6:2 FTCA 和 6:2 FTSA 分别表现出较弱和中等的肝毒性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验