Department of Dermatology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Institute of Medical Psychology, Justus Liebig University, Giessen, Germany.
Br J Dermatol. 2017 May;176(5):1170-1178. doi: 10.1111/bjd.15280. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
Generic instruments measuring health-related quality of life (HRQoL), like EQ5D™, enable comparison of skin diseases with healthy populations and nondermatological medical conditions, as well as calculation of utility data.
To measure HRQoL in patients with common skin diseases and healthy controls across Europe using the EQ5D.
This multicentre observational cross-sectional study was conducted in 13 European countries. Each dermatology clinic recruited at least 250 consecutive adult outpatients to complete questionnaires, including the EQ5D.
There were 5369 participants (4010 patients and 1359 controls). Mean ± SD self-rated health state reported by patients was 69·9 ± 19·7; for controls it was 82·2 ± 15·5. When adjusted for confounding factors, including comorbidity, mean patient EQ visual analogue scores were 10·5 points lower than for controls (standardized β = -0·23). Odds ratio with 95% confidence interval for impairment in all five dimensions of EQ5D adjusted for confounders was doubled for patients compared with controls. Patients with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), blistering conditions, leg ulcers, psoriasis and eczemas had the highest risk for reduction in HRQoL in most dimensions (2-10-fold). Data on differences of impairment by dimensions offer new insights.
This study confirms the large impact skin conditions have on patients' well-being, differentiating between aspects of HRQoL. Patients with HS, blistering diseases, leg ulcers, infections and most chronic skin diseases reported reduced HRQoL compared with patients with chronic obstructive lung disease, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease and cancers. These findings are important in the prioritization of resource allocation between medical fields and within dermatological subspecialities.
通用的健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)量表,如 EQ5D™,可用于比较皮肤病与健康人群和非皮肤科医疗状况,并计算效用数据。
使用 EQ5D 评估欧洲常见皮肤病患者和健康对照者的 HRQoL。
这是一项多中心观察性横断面研究,在 13 个欧洲国家进行。每个皮肤科诊所招募至少 250 名连续的成年门诊患者完成问卷,包括 EQ5D。
共有 5369 名参与者(4010 名患者和 1359 名对照者)。患者自评健康状况的平均值±标准差为 69.9±19.7;对照者为 82.2±15.5。调整混杂因素后,包括合并症,患者的 EQ 视觉模拟评分平均比对照者低 10.5 分(标准化β=-0.23)。调整混杂因素后,所有五个 EQ5D 维度受损的比值比(OR)为患者的 2 倍(95%置信区间[CI]:1.12-3.61)。与对照者相比,患有化脓性汗腺炎、大疱性疾病、腿部溃疡、银屑病和湿疹的患者,大多数维度的 HRQoL 下降风险最高(2-10 倍)。按维度评估受损情况的数据提供了新的见解。
本研究证实了皮肤病对患者幸福感的巨大影响,区分了 HRQoL 的不同方面。与患有慢性阻塞性肺疾病、糖尿病、心血管疾病和癌症的患者相比,患有化脓性汗腺炎、大疱性疾病、腿部溃疡、感染和大多数慢性皮肤病的患者报告 HRQoL 降低。这些发现对于在医学领域之间和皮肤科亚专科内优先分配资源具有重要意义。