Hannover Bettina, Gubernath John, Schultze Martin, Zander Lysann
Department of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Department of Educational Science, Leibniz University Hannover, Hanover, Germany.
Front Psychol. 2018 Dec 3;9:2399. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02399. eCollection 2018.
The New Year's Eve 2015 mass sexual assaults in Germany led to a broader debate about whether the perpetrators, most of them self-identifying as Muslims, were encouraged to such acts by particularly sexist attitudes toward girls and women. Here, we argue that it is not the specific religious affiliation of individuals that predicts sexism. Rather it should be the extent to which they are involved in their religion, i.e., their religiosity and their endorsement of religious fundamentalism. In line with the theory of ambivalent sexism, we distinguish hostile and benevolent sexism, while controlling for right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation. In two Pilot Studies, we explored differences in ambivalent sexism (a) between male and female individuals of Muslim faith, Christian faith, Muslim faith, Christian faith, and no religious affiliation residing in Germany, while at the same time (b) differentiating between sexism directed toward girls and sexism directed toward women. In our Main Study, we tested the interrelations between religiosity, religious fundamentalism, and ambivalent sexism in our religious subsamples of male Christians, female Christians, male Muslims, and female Muslims using a multigroup multivariate moderated mediation analysis. In all three studies, Muslims were more religious, endorsed religious fundamentalism more strongly, and held stronger benevolent sexist beliefs toward girls and women as well as stronger hostile sexist beliefs toward women than Christians and non-religious participants. In our Main Study, with female Christians as the reference group, male Muslims' stronger benevolent and hostile sexist beliefs toward girls were mediated by religiosity and fundamentalism. Female Muslims' stronger endorsement of benevolent sexism toward girls could be explained by their higher level of fundamentalism. While our findings show that differences in ambivalent sexism between religious groups were partly due to different levels of religiosity and fundamentalism, they also suggest that there are factors other than those investigated in our studies responsible for male Muslims' particularly strong sexism. We discuss specific contents of Islamic religious teachings and honor beliefs as possible causes to be investigated further in future research.
2015年新年前夜德国发生的大规模性侵事件引发了一场更广泛的辩论,即大多数自称穆斯林的犯罪者是否受到了对女孩和女性特别性别歧视态度的怂恿而实施此类行为。在此,我们认为,预测性别歧视的并非个人的特定宗教归属。相反,应该是他们参与宗教的程度,即他们的宗教虔诚度以及对宗教原教旨主义的认同。根据矛盾性别歧视理论,我们区分了敌意性性别歧视和善意性性别歧视,同时控制了右翼威权主义和社会支配取向。在两项先导研究中,我们探讨了(a)居住在德国的穆斯林信仰、基督教信仰、无宗教信仰的男性和女性个体之间在矛盾性别歧视方面的差异,同时(b)区分针对女孩的性别歧视和针对女性的性别歧视。在我们的主要研究中,我们使用多组多元调节中介分析,检验了男性基督徒、女性基督徒、男性穆斯林和女性穆斯林宗教子样本中宗教虔诚度、宗教原教旨主义和矛盾性别歧视之间的相互关系。在所有三项研究中,与基督徒和无宗教信仰参与者相比,穆斯林宗教信仰更强,更强烈地认同宗教原教旨主义,对女孩和女性持有更强的善意性性别歧视信念,对女性也持有更强的敌意性性别歧视信念。在我们的主要研究中,以女性基督徒为参照组,男性穆斯林对女孩更强的善意性和敌意性性别歧视信念是由宗教虔诚度和原教旨主义介导的。女性穆斯林对女孩更强的善意性性别歧视认同可以用她们更高的原教旨主义水平来解释。虽然我们的研究结果表明宗教群体之间矛盾性别歧视的差异部分归因于不同的宗教虔诚度和原教旨主义水平,但它们也表明,除了我们研究中调查的因素之外,还有其他因素导致男性穆斯林特别强烈的性别歧视。我们讨论了伊斯兰宗教教义的具体内容和荣誉信念,作为未来研究中可能需要进一步调查的原因。