1 Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL, USA.
Assessment. 2019 Mar;26(2):271-280. doi: 10.1177/1073191116686685. Epub 2016 Dec 29.
The purpose of the current studies is to identify safety behavior dimensions relevant to test anxiety, to develop a questionnaire to assess those dimensions, and to examine the validity of that questionnaire. Items were generated from interviews with college students ( N = 24). Another sample ( N = 301) completed an initial 33-item measure. Another sample ( N = 151) completed the final 19-item version the Safety Behaviors in Test Anxiety Questionnaire and provided access to their academic records. Interviews and expert evaluations were used to select items for the initial pool. An examination of item distributions and exploratory factor analysis were used to identify dimensions and reduce the item pool. Confirmatory factor analyses were used to validate the factorial structure. Correlational analyses were used to examine criterion validity of the final measure. The Safety Behaviors in Test Anxiety Questionnaire consists of a 9-item "Superstitious Behaviors" scale and a 10-item "Reassurance Seeking." The measure shows good content validity, factorial validity, internal consistency, and convergent and discriminant validity. Only the Reassurance Seeking scale showed good incremental criterion validity. Overall, these findings suggest that reassurance seeking may be a neglected target for interventions that might increase performance on high stakes tests.
本研究旨在确定与考试焦虑相关的安全行为维度,开发评估这些维度的问卷,并检验该问卷的有效性。项目是从与大学生的访谈中生成的(N=24)。另一个样本(N=301)完成了一个初始的 33 项测量。另一个样本(N=151)完成了最终的 19 项测试焦虑中的安全行为问卷,并提供了他们的学术记录。访谈和专家评估用于为初始池选择项目。项目分布和探索性因素分析用于确定维度并减少项目池。验证性因素分析用于验证因子结构的有效性。相关分析用于检验最终测量的效标效度。考试焦虑中的安全行为问卷由 9 项“迷信行为”量表和 10 项“寻求安慰”量表组成。该测量具有良好的内容效度、因子效度、内部一致性以及聚合和区分效度。只有寻求安慰量表显示出良好的增量标准有效性。总的来说,这些发现表明,寻求安慰可能是干预措施中被忽视的目标,这些干预措施可能会提高高风险测试的表现。