Dulon M, Lisiak B, Wendeler D, Nienhaus A
Department of Occupational Medicine, Public Health and Hazardous Substances, Statutory Accident Insurance and Prevention in the Health and Welfare Services, Hamburg, Germany.
Department of Occupational Medicine, Public Health and Hazardous Substances, Statutory Accident Insurance and Prevention in the Health and Welfare Services, Hamburg, Germany.
J Hosp Infect. 2017 Mar;95(3):306-311. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2016.11.015. Epub 2016 Nov 29.
Needlestick injuries (NSIs) are the most common cause of sharps injuries and pose a serious risk to healthcare workers (HCWs). In 2014, 'Technical rule for biological agents in healthcare and welfare facilities' (TRBA 250) was modified in Germany in order to promote the prevention of sharps injuries.
To examine the epidemiology of NSIs among HCWs in hospitals, doctor's offices and in- and outpatient care; to collect information on the causes of the accidents when safety-engineered devices (SEDs) are used; and to compare the results with the main principles of TRBA 250.
The survey was based on HCWs' compensation claims for NSIs, as notified within a four-week period in November 2014. Detailed information on the NSI was collected by telephone interview.
In total, 533 HCWs participated. Subcutaneous needles were most often involved in NSIs, regardless of the healthcare setting (39% of all NSIs). Insulin pens were involved in 48% of NSIs in in- and outpatient care. Disposal of sharps devices accounted for 38% of the injuries. SEDs were used in 20% of NSIs. Lack of activation was the most important cause of failure when SEDs were used.
Despite the binding recommendations of TRBA 250, more efforts are needed to increase the experience of HCWs in terms of working with SEDs. All professional groups must be encouraged to be more aware of the risks associated with sharps disposal. Safe handling practices for disposal of insulin pens are needed in in- and outpatient care settings.
针刺伤是锐器伤最常见的原因,对医护人员构成严重风险。2014年,德国对《医疗和福利设施生物制剂技术规则》(TRBA 250)进行了修订,以促进锐器伤的预防。
调查医院、诊所及门诊和住院护理中医护人员针刺伤的流行病学情况;收集使用安全工程装置(SEDs)时事故原因的信息;并将结果与TRBA 250的主要原则进行比较。
该调查基于医护人员2014年11月四周内通报的针刺伤赔偿申请。通过电话访谈收集针刺伤的详细信息。
共有533名医护人员参与。无论医疗环境如何,皮下注射针最常导致针刺伤(占所有针刺伤的39%)。胰岛素笔导致门诊和住院护理中48%的针刺伤。锐器装置处理导致38%的伤害。20%的针刺伤使用了SEDs。使用SEDs时,未激活是最重要的故障原因。
尽管TRBA 250有具有约束力的建议,但仍需做出更多努力,以增加医护人员使用SEDs的经验。必须鼓励所有专业群体更加意识到与锐器处理相关的风险。门诊和住院护理环境中需要有胰岛素笔处理的安全操作规范。