• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三种医疗环境中针刺伤的原因:对德国实施欧盟指令2010/32/EU六个月后登记的事故通报进行分析。

Causes of needlestick injuries in three healthcare settings: analysis of accident notifications registered six months after the implementation of EU Directive 2010/32/EU in Germany.

作者信息

Dulon M, Lisiak B, Wendeler D, Nienhaus A

机构信息

Department of Occupational Medicine, Public Health and Hazardous Substances, Statutory Accident Insurance and Prevention in the Health and Welfare Services, Hamburg, Germany.

Department of Occupational Medicine, Public Health and Hazardous Substances, Statutory Accident Insurance and Prevention in the Health and Welfare Services, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

J Hosp Infect. 2017 Mar;95(3):306-311. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2016.11.015. Epub 2016 Nov 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.jhin.2016.11.015
PMID:28034473
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Needlestick injuries (NSIs) are the most common cause of sharps injuries and pose a serious risk to healthcare workers (HCWs). In 2014, 'Technical rule for biological agents in healthcare and welfare facilities' (TRBA 250) was modified in Germany in order to promote the prevention of sharps injuries.

AIMS

To examine the epidemiology of NSIs among HCWs in hospitals, doctor's offices and in- and outpatient care; to collect information on the causes of the accidents when safety-engineered devices (SEDs) are used; and to compare the results with the main principles of TRBA 250.

METHODS

The survey was based on HCWs' compensation claims for NSIs, as notified within a four-week period in November 2014. Detailed information on the NSI was collected by telephone interview.

FINDINGS

In total, 533 HCWs participated. Subcutaneous needles were most often involved in NSIs, regardless of the healthcare setting (39% of all NSIs). Insulin pens were involved in 48% of NSIs in in- and outpatient care. Disposal of sharps devices accounted for 38% of the injuries. SEDs were used in 20% of NSIs. Lack of activation was the most important cause of failure when SEDs were used.

CONCLUSION

Despite the binding recommendations of TRBA 250, more efforts are needed to increase the experience of HCWs in terms of working with SEDs. All professional groups must be encouraged to be more aware of the risks associated with sharps disposal. Safe handling practices for disposal of insulin pens are needed in in- and outpatient care settings.

摘要

背景

针刺伤是锐器伤最常见的原因,对医护人员构成严重风险。2014年,德国对《医疗和福利设施生物制剂技术规则》(TRBA 250)进行了修订,以促进锐器伤的预防。

目的

调查医院、诊所及门诊和住院护理中医护人员针刺伤的流行病学情况;收集使用安全工程装置(SEDs)时事故原因的信息;并将结果与TRBA 250的主要原则进行比较。

方法

该调查基于医护人员2014年11月四周内通报的针刺伤赔偿申请。通过电话访谈收集针刺伤的详细信息。

结果

共有533名医护人员参与。无论医疗环境如何,皮下注射针最常导致针刺伤(占所有针刺伤的39%)。胰岛素笔导致门诊和住院护理中48%的针刺伤。锐器装置处理导致38%的伤害。20%的针刺伤使用了SEDs。使用SEDs时,未激活是最重要的故障原因。

结论

尽管TRBA 250有具有约束力的建议,但仍需做出更多努力,以增加医护人员使用SEDs的经验。必须鼓励所有专业群体更加意识到与锐器处理相关的风险。门诊和住院护理环境中需要有胰岛素笔处理的安全操作规范。

相似文献

1
Causes of needlestick injuries in three healthcare settings: analysis of accident notifications registered six months after the implementation of EU Directive 2010/32/EU in Germany.三种医疗环境中针刺伤的原因:对德国实施欧盟指令2010/32/EU六个月后登记的事故通报进行分析。
J Hosp Infect. 2017 Mar;95(3):306-311. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2016.11.015. Epub 2016 Nov 29.
2
Causes of Needlestick and Sharps Injuries When Using Devices with and without Safety Features.使用具有和不具有安全功能的装置时发生针刺和锐器伤的原因。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 24;17(23):8721. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17238721.
3
Needlestick prevention devices: data from hospital surveillance in Piedmont, Italy-comprehensive analysis on needlestick injuries between healthcare workers after the introduction of safety devices.针刺伤预防装置:来自意大利皮埃蒙特医院监测的数据——对安全装置引入后医护人员之间针刺伤情况的综合分析
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 19;9(11):e030576. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030576.
4
Do safety engineered devices reduce needlestick injuries?安全工程设备是否能减少针刺伤?
J Hosp Infect. 2018 Sep;100(1):99-104. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2018.04.026. Epub 2018 May 5.
5
[Workers' Compensation Claims for Needlestick Injuries Among Healthcare Personnel in Hospitals, Doctors' Surgeries and Nursing Institutions].[医院、诊所及护理机构医护人员针刺伤的工伤赔偿申请]
Gesundheitswesen. 2018 Feb;80(2):176-182. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-114003. Epub 2017 Jul 28.
6
Devices for preventing percutaneous exposure injuries caused by needles in healthcare personnel.用于预防医护人员因针头导致的经皮暴露损伤的装置。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 14;11(11):CD009740. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009740.pub3.
7
Needle stick injuries in a tertiary care hospital.三级护理医院中的针刺伤
Indian J Med Microbiol. 2009 Jan-Mar;27(1):44-7.
8
Needlestick and Sharps Injuries Among Nurses at a Teaching Hospital in China.中国一家教学医院护士的针刺伤和锐器伤情况。
Workplace Health Saf. 2015 May;63(5):219-25. doi: 10.1177/2165079915580035. Epub 2015 Jun 1.
9
Needlestick injury rates according to different types of safety-engineered devices: results of a French multicenter study.不同类型工程学安全装置所致针刺伤发生率:一项法国多中心研究结果。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010 Apr;31(4):402-7. doi: 10.1086/651301.
10
Needlestick and sharps injuries in a tertiary hospital in the Republic of Korea.韩国一家三级医院的针刺伤和锐器伤
Am J Infect Control. 2008 Aug;36(6):439-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2007.07.011.

引用本文的文献

1
Occupational protection behavior and its influencing factors of newly recruited nurses.新入职护士职业防护行为及其影响因素。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Oct 25;23(1):797. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04780-6.
2
Needlestick and sharps injuries at a German university hospital: epidemiology, causes and preventive potential - a descriptive analysis.德国某大学医院针刺伤和锐器伤:流行病学、原因和预防潜力——描述性分析。
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2022 Aug 1;35(4):497-507. doi: 10.13075/ijomeh.1896.01854. Epub 2022 May 31.
3
Disposal of Waste from Tattoo and Beauty Parlors in Poland: A Survey-Based Analysis on Epidemiological Safety.
波兰纹身和美容院废物处理:基于调查的流行病学安全性分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 1;18(23):12673. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312673.
4
Causes of Needlestick and Sharps Injuries When Using Devices with and without Safety Features.使用具有和不具有安全功能的装置时发生针刺和锐器伤的原因。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 24;17(23):8721. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17238721.
5
Infections in Healthcare Workers in Germany-22-Year Time Trends.德国医护人员感染-22 年时间趋势。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Nov 26;15(12):2656. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15122656.
6
Seroconversion after needlestick injuries - analyses of statutory accident insurance claims in Germany.针刺伤后的血清学转换——德国法定事故保险索赔分析
GMS Hyg Infect Control. 2018 Jul 6;13:Doc05. doi: 10.3205/dgkh000311. eCollection 2018.