• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用具有和不具有安全功能的装置时发生针刺和锐器伤的原因。

Causes of Needlestick and Sharps Injuries When Using Devices with and without Safety Features.

机构信息

German Social Accident Insurance, Institution for the Health and Welfare Services (BGW), 22089 Hamburg, Germany.

Competence Center for Epidemiology and Health Services Research for Healthcare Professionals (CVCare), 20246 Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 24;17(23):8721. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17238721.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph17238721
PMID:33255337
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7727709/
Abstract

Safety-engineered devices (SEDs) have been developed to protect healthcare personnel (HCP) from needlestick and sharps injuries (NSIs). The aim of this study was to analyze NSIs associated with SEDs and non-SEDs among HCP in hospitals, medical offices and care facilities. Records from online questionnaires on NSIs were used. Causes of NSIs were compared for SED use and healthcare setting. A sample of 835 files was included. Injuries with SEDs accounted for 35.0% of all NSIs, whereas the proportions were higher in medical offices and lower in care facilities. NSIs in nurses were more often associated with SEDs than NSIs in physicians. NSIs from intravenous needles were associated with SEDs in more than 60% of cases in hospitals and medical offices and in about 30.0% of cases in care facilities. In contrast, suturing was associated with every fourth NSI in hospitals, of which fewer than 10.0% were associated with SEDs. In care facilities, SEDs were involved in 36.1% of NSIs during subcutaneous injections. NSIs during disposal accounted for 29.2% of total NSIs, of which 36.1% were associated with SEDs. Frequent reasons for SED-associated NSIs were technical problems, unexpected patient movement and problems during disposal. Our analysis shows that many NSIs are associated with SEDs. Continuous training is necessary in the handling and disposal of SEDs.

摘要

安全工程设备 (SED) 的开发是为了保护医护人员 (HCP) 免受针和锐器伤害 (NSI)。本研究旨在分析医院、医疗办公室和护理机构中 HCP 使用 SED 和非 SED 时发生的 NSI。使用在线 NSI 问卷调查记录。比较了 SED 使用和医疗环境中 NSI 的原因。共纳入 835 份文件的样本。SED 相关的 NSI 占所有 NSI 的 35.0%,而医疗办公室的比例较高,护理机构的比例较低。护士发生的 NSI 与 SED 的相关性大于医生发生的 NSI。静脉内针引起的 NSI 与 SED 的相关性在医院和医疗办公室中超过 60%的病例中,在护理机构中约为 30.0%。相比之下,在医院中,缝合与每四例 NSI 相关,其中不到 10.0%与 SED 相关。在护理机构中,SED 与皮下注射时的 36.1%的 NSI 相关。处理过程中的 NSI 占总 NSI 的 29.2%,其中 36.1%与 SED 相关。SED 相关 NSI 的常见原因是技术问题、患者意外移动和处理过程中的问题。我们的分析表明,许多 NSI 与 SED 相关。SED 的处理和处置需要持续培训。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b5f/7727709/7f92217f9914/ijerph-17-08721-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b5f/7727709/7f92217f9914/ijerph-17-08721-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b5f/7727709/7f92217f9914/ijerph-17-08721-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Causes of Needlestick and Sharps Injuries When Using Devices with and without Safety Features.使用具有和不具有安全功能的装置时发生针刺和锐器伤的原因。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 24;17(23):8721. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17238721.
2
Needlestick prevention devices: data from hospital surveillance in Piedmont, Italy-comprehensive analysis on needlestick injuries between healthcare workers after the introduction of safety devices.针刺伤预防装置:来自意大利皮埃蒙特医院监测的数据——对安全装置引入后医护人员之间针刺伤情况的综合分析
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 19;9(11):e030576. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030576.
3
Causes of needlestick injuries in three healthcare settings: analysis of accident notifications registered six months after the implementation of EU Directive 2010/32/EU in Germany.三种医疗环境中针刺伤的原因:对德国实施欧盟指令2010/32/EU六个月后登记的事故通报进行分析。
J Hosp Infect. 2017 Mar;95(3):306-311. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2016.11.015. Epub 2016 Nov 29.
4
Do safety engineered devices reduce needlestick injuries?安全工程设备是否能减少针刺伤?
J Hosp Infect. 2018 Sep;100(1):99-104. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2018.04.026. Epub 2018 May 5.
5
Economic benefits of safety-engineered sharp devices in Belgium - a budget impact model.比利时安全工程锐器的经济效益——预算影响模型。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Nov 25;13:489. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-489.
6
Needlestick injury rates according to different types of safety-engineered devices: results of a French multicenter study.不同类型工程学安全装置所致针刺伤发生率:一项法国多中心研究结果。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010 Apr;31(4):402-7. doi: 10.1086/651301.
7
Devices for preventing percutaneous exposure injuries caused by needles in healthcare personnel.用于预防医护人员因针头导致的经皮暴露损伤的装置。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 14;11(11):CD009740. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009740.pub3.
8
UK safety-engineered device use: changes since the 2013 sharps regulations.英国安全工程设备使用:自 2013 年锐器规章以来的变化。
Occup Med (Lond). 2019 Aug 22;69(5):352-358. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqz087.
9
Reducing needlestick injuries through safety-engineered devices: results of a Japanese multi-centre study.通过安全工程设备减少针刺伤:一项日本多中心研究的结果。
J Hosp Infect. 2016 Feb;92(2):147-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2015.09.019. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
10
Role of safety-engineered devices in preventing needlestick injuries in 32 French hospitals.安全设计器械在法国32家医院预防针刺伤中的作用
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2007 Jan;28(1):18-23. doi: 10.1086/510814. Epub 2006 Dec 18.

引用本文的文献

1
A machine learning-based approach for precision risk stratification and multifactorial analysis of needlestick injuries in oral and maxillofacial surgery nursing.一种基于机器学习的方法,用于口腔颌面外科护理中针刺伤的精准风险分层和多因素分析。
BMC Nurs. 2025 Jul 1;24(1):698. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03362-9.
2
Intelligent blood collection robot: key technologies, clinical applications, and future challenges.智能采血机器人:关键技术、临床应用及未来挑战
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025 May 30;13:1587114. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1587114. eCollection 2025.
3
Did safety-engineered device implementation contribute to reducing the risk of needlestick and sharps injuries? Retrospective investigation of 20 years of observation in a specialist tertiary referral hospital.

本文引用的文献

1
Needlestick injuries: the role of safety-engineered devices in prevention.针刺伤:安全工程器械在预防中的作用。
Br J Nurs. 2020 Jul 23;29(14):S22-S30. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2020.29.14.S22.
2
Needlestick prevention devices: data from hospital surveillance in Piedmont, Italy-comprehensive analysis on needlestick injuries between healthcare workers after the introduction of safety devices.针刺伤预防装置:来自意大利皮埃蒙特医院监测的数据——对安全装置引入后医护人员之间针刺伤情况的综合分析
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 19;9(11):e030576. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030576.
3
Do training and needle-safety devices prevent needlestick injuries? A systematised review of the literature.
安全工程设备的实施是否有助于降低针刺和锐器伤的风险?对一家专科三级转诊医院 20 年观察的回顾性调查。
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2024 May 20;37(2):234-243. doi: 10.13075/ijomeh.1896.02308. Epub 2024 May 9.
4
Determination and prioritization of factors affecting the occurrence of needle stick injuries among healthcare workers using techniques of Delphi and fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (FAHP).运用德尔菲法和模糊层次分析法确定并优先考虑影响医护人员发生针刺伤的因素。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Oct 16;23(1):2009. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16969-x.
5
Sleep and Safety among Healthcare Workers: The Effect of Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Sleep Deprivation on Safety.医护人员的睡眠与安全:阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停和睡眠剥夺对安全的影响。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Nov 24;58(12):1723. doi: 10.3390/medicina58121723.
6
Biohazard Accidents, Harmful Elements to the Wellness of Healthcare Workers, and Their Risk Factors.生物危害事故、危害医护人员健康的有害因素及其危险因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 14;19(20):13214. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192013214.
7
Prevention from Sharp Injuries in the Hospital Sector: An Italian National Observatory on the Implementation of the Council Directive 2010/32/EU before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic.医院部门锐器伤的预防:意大利国家观察站在 COVID-19 大流行之前和期间对理事会指令 2010/32/EU 的实施情况进行的监测。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 5;19(17):11144. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191711144.
8
Comparing risk changes of needlestick injuries between countries adopted and not adopted the needlestick safety and prevention act: A meta-analysis.比较采用和未采用《针刺安全与预防法案》的国家之间针刺伤风险变化:一项荟萃分析。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2022 Sep;43(9):1221-1227. doi: 10.1017/ice.2021.372. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
培训和针头安全装置能否预防针刺伤?文献的系统评价。
Br J Nurs. 2018 Sep 6;27(16):944-952. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2018.27.16.944.
4
Do safety engineered devices reduce needlestick injuries?安全工程设备是否能减少针刺伤?
J Hosp Infect. 2018 Sep;100(1):99-104. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2018.04.026. Epub 2018 May 5.
5
Devices for preventing percutaneous exposure injuries caused by needles in healthcare personnel.用于预防医护人员因针头导致的经皮暴露损伤的装置。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 14;11(11):CD009740. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009740.pub3.
6
Clinical, economic, and humanistic burden of needlestick injuries in healthcare workers.医护人员针刺伤的临床、经济和人文负担。
Med Devices (Auckl). 2017 Sep 29;10:225-235. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S140846. eCollection 2017.
7
Comparing non-safety with safety device sharps injury incidence data from two different occupational surveillance systems.比较两个不同职业监测系统的非安全与安全器械锐器伤发生率数据。
J Hosp Infect. 2017 Jun;96(2):195-198. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2017.02.021. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
8
Causes of needlestick injuries in three healthcare settings: analysis of accident notifications registered six months after the implementation of EU Directive 2010/32/EU in Germany.三种医疗环境中针刺伤的原因:对德国实施欧盟指令2010/32/EU六个月后登记的事故通报进行分析。
J Hosp Infect. 2017 Mar;95(3):306-311. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2016.11.015. Epub 2016 Nov 29.
9
Risk Reduction of Needle Stick Injuries Due to Continuous Shift from Unsafe to Safe Instruments at a German University Hospital.德国一家大学医院通过持续从不安全器械转向安全器械来降低针刺伤风险
Eur J Microbiol Immunol (Bp). 2016 Aug 23;6(3):227-237. doi: 10.1556/1886.2016.00025. eCollection 2016 Sep 29.
10
Use of safety-engineered devices by healthcare workers for intravenous and/or phlebotomy procedures in healthcare settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.医护人员在医疗机构中使用安全工程设备进行静脉注射和/或静脉穿刺操作:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Sep 1;16:458. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1705-y.