• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

韩国经皮冠状动脉介入治疗和冠状动脉旁路移植术的趋势

Trends in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery in Korea.

作者信息

Lee Heeyoung, Lee Kun Sei, Sim Sung Bo, Jeong Hyo Seon, Ahn Hye Mi, Chee Hyun Keun

机构信息

Center for Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital.

Department of Preventive Medicine, Konkuk University School of Medicine.

出版信息

Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Dec;49(Suppl 1):S60-S67. doi: 10.5090/kjtcs.2016.49.S1.S60. Epub 2016 Dec 5.

DOI:10.5090/kjtcs.2016.49.S1.S60
PMID:28035299
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5173333/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Coronary angioplasty has been replacing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) because of the relative advantage in terms of recovery time and noninvasiveness of the procedure. Compared to other Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries, Korea has experienced a rapid increase in coronary angioplasty volumes.

METHODS

We analyzed changes in procedure volumes of CABG and of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) from three sources: the OECD Health Data, the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) surgery statistics, and the National Health Insurance claims data.

RESULTS

We found the ratio of procedure volume of PCI to that of CABG per 100,000 population was 19.12 in 2014, which was more than triple the OECD average of 5.92 for the same year. According to data from NHIS statistics, this ratio was an increase from 11.4 to 19.3 between 2006 and 2013.

CONCLUSION

We found that Korea has a higher ratio of total procedure volumes of PCI with respect to CABG and also a more rapid increase of volumes of PCI than other countries. Prospective studies are required to determine whether this increase in absolute volumes of PCI is a natural response to a real medical need or representative of medical overuse.

摘要

背景

由于冠状动脉成形术在恢复时间和手术无创性方面具有相对优势,其已逐渐取代冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)。与其他经济合作与发展组织(OECD)国家相比,韩国的冠状动脉成形术数量增长迅速。

方法

我们从三个来源分析了冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的手术量变化:经合组织卫生数据、国民健康保险服务(NHIS)手术统计数据以及国民健康保险理赔数据。

结果

我们发现,2014年每10万人口中PCI与CABG的手术量之比为19.12,这是同年经合组织平均水平5.92的三倍多。根据国民健康保险服务统计数据,2006年至2013年间,这一比例从11.4增至19.3。

结论

我们发现,韩国PCI与CABG的总手术量之比更高,且PCI手术量的增长速度比其他国家更快。需要进行前瞻性研究,以确定PCI绝对手术量的增加是对实际医疗需求的自然反应,还是医疗过度使用的表现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/580c/5173333/e1d8c1d1c6a5/kjtcv-49suppl.issue-060f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/580c/5173333/e1d8c1d1c6a5/kjtcv-49suppl.issue-060f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/580c/5173333/e1d8c1d1c6a5/kjtcv-49suppl.issue-060f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Trends in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery in Korea.韩国经皮冠状动脉介入治疗和冠状动脉旁路移植术的趋势
Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Dec;49(Suppl 1):S60-S67. doi: 10.5090/kjtcs.2016.49.S1.S60. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
2
Stroke Rates Following Surgical Versus Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization.冠状动脉血运重建术后卒率比较:外科手术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Jul 24;72(4):386-398. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.04.071.
3
The Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Study: 5-year follow-up of revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in diabetic patients with multivessel disease.Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Study:5 年随访:多血管病变糖尿病患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术血运重建的比较。
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2010 Jan;11(1):26-33. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e328330ea32.
4
Ten-year outcomes of patients randomized to surgery, angioplasty, or medical treatment for stable multivessel coronary disease: effect of age in the Medicine, Angioplasty, or Surgery Study II trial.稳定多血管冠状动脉疾病患者随机接受手术、血管成形术或药物治疗的 10 年结果:Medicine, Angioplasty, or Surgery Study II 试验中年龄的影响。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Nov;146(5):1105-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.08.015. Epub 2012 Aug 31.
5
Factors associated with the rates of coronary artery bypass graft and percutaneous coronary intervention.与冠状动脉旁路移植术和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗相关的因素。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019 Nov 29;19(1):275. doi: 10.1186/s12872-019-1264-3.
6
Cost-effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention versus bypass surgery from a Dutch perspective.从荷兰视角看经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与搭桥手术的成本效益
Heart. 2015 Dec;101(24):1980-8. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2015-307578. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
7
Percutaneous coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass grafting in the treatment of unprotected left main stenosis: updated 5-year outcomes from the randomised, non-inferiority NOBLE trial.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗无保护左主干狭窄:NOBLE 随机非劣效性试验的 5 年更新结果。
Lancet. 2020 Jan 18;395(10219):191-199. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32972-1. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
8
Cost-effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents versus bypass surgery for patients with 3-vessel or left main coronary artery disease: final results from the Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) trial.药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与旁路手术治疗 3 支血管病变或左主干病变患者的成本效益:紫杉醇药物洗脱支架与心脏手术(SYNTAX)试验的最终结果。
Circulation. 2014 Sep 30;130(14):1146-57. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.009985. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
9
Readmission rate after coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected left main coronary artery narrowing.非保护左主干冠状动脉狭窄行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术后的再入院率。
Am J Cardiol. 2014 May 15;113(10):1639-46. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.02.013. Epub 2014 Mar 1.
10
Percutaneous coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass grafting in treatment of unprotected left main stenosis (NOBLE): a prospective, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗无保护左主干狭窄(NOBLE):一项前瞻性、随机、开放标签、非劣效性试验。
Lancet. 2016 Dec 3;388(10061):2743-2752. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32052-9. Epub 2016 Oct 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Machine learning-driven prediction of medical expenses in triple-vessel PCI patients using feature selection.利用特征选择通过机器学习驱动预测三支血管PCI患者的医疗费用
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jan 20;25(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12218-6.
2
Association of Chronic Kidney Disease With Atrial Fibrillation in the General Adult Population: A Nationwide Population-Based Study.慢性肾脏病与普通成年人群心房颤动的相关性:一项全国范围内基于人群的研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Apr 18;12(8):e028496. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.028496. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
3
Ten-year trends of clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention: a Korean nationwide longitudinal cohort study.

本文引用的文献

1
Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Versus Drug-Eluting Stents Implantation for Previous Myocardial Infarction.冠状动脉旁路移植术与药物洗脱支架植入术治疗既往心肌梗死的比较
Am J Cardiol. 2016 Jul 1;118(1):17-22. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.04.009. Epub 2016 Apr 21.
2
2015 ACC/AHA/SCAI Focused Update on Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: An Update of the 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and the 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions.2015年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会/心血管造影和介入学会关于ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的聚焦更新:2011年美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会/心血管造影和介入学会经皮冠状动脉介入治疗指南以及2013年美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会ST段抬高型心肌梗死管理指南的更新:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南工作组和心血管造影与介入学会的报告
Circulation. 2016 Mar 15;133(11):1135-47. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000336. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后 10 年临床结局的趋势:一项韩国全国性纵向队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 20;12(4):e056972. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056972.
4
A Risk Prediction Model for Operative Mortality after Heart Valve Surgery in a Korean Cohort.韩国队列中心脏瓣膜手术后手术死亡率的风险预测模型
J Chest Surg. 2021 Apr 5;54(2):88-98. doi: 10.5090/jcs.20.102.
5
Trends in Utilization and In-hospital Outcomes of Cardiac Surgery.心脏手术的使用趋势及院内结局
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Apr 1;35(2):VII-IX. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-1-2020-0603.
3
2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI).2014年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲心胸外科学会心肌血运重建指南:欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)和欧洲心胸外科学会(EACTS)心肌血运重建特别工作组编写,欧洲经皮心血管介入协会(EAPCI)提供特别贡献。
Eur Heart J. 2014 Oct 1;35(37):2541-619. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu278. Epub 2014 Aug 29.