Knekt Paul, Lindfors Olavi, Keinänen Matti, Heinonen Erkki, Virtala Esa, Härkänen Tommi
National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Biomedicum Helsinki, Finland.
Psychol Psychother. 2017 Sep;90(3):353-376. doi: 10.1111/papt.12115. Epub 2016 Dec 30.
How level of personality organization (LPO) predicts psychiatric symptoms and work ability in short- versus long-term psychotherapies is poorly known. We investigated the importance of the LPO on the benefits of short-term versus long-term psychotherapies.
A cohort study based on 326 outpatients with mood or anxiety disorder was allocated to long-term (LPP) and short-term (SPP) psychodynamic psychotherapy, and solution-focused therapy (SFT).
The LPO was assessed by interview at baseline and categorized into neuroses and higher level borderline. Outcome was assessed at baseline and 4-9 times during a 5-year follow-up, using self-report and interview-based measures of symptoms and work ability.
For patients receiving SPP, improvement in work ability, symptom reduction, and the remission rate were more considerable in patients with neuroses than in higher level borderline patients, whereas LPP or SFT showed no notable differences in effectiveness in the two LPO groups. In patients with neuroses, improvement was more considerable in the short-term therapy groups during the first year of follow-up, and in higher level borderline patients LPP was more effective after 3 years of follow-up. The remission rate, defined as both symptom reduction and lack of auxiliary treatment, was higher in LPP than in SPP for both the LPO groups considered.
In neuroses, short-term psychotherapy was associated with a more rapid reduction of symptoms and increase in work ability, whereas LPP was more effective for longer follow-ups in both LPO groups. Further large-scale studies are needed.
Level of personality organization is relevant for selection between short- and long-term psychotherapies. Short-term therapy gives faster benefits for neurotic patients but not for patients with higher level borderline personality organization. Sustained remission from symptoms is more probable after long-term than short-term therapy.
人格组织水平(LPO)如何预测短期和长期心理治疗中的精神症状及工作能力,目前尚不清楚。我们研究了LPO对短期和长期心理治疗效果的重要性。
一项队列研究,326名患有情绪或焦虑障碍的门诊患者被分配到长期(LPP)和短期(SPP)心理动力心理治疗以及聚焦解决疗法(SFT)组。
在基线时通过访谈评估LPO,并将其分为神经症和更高水平的边缘型。在基线以及5年随访期间的4 - 9次随访中,使用基于自我报告和访谈的症状及工作能力测量方法评估结果。
对于接受SPP的患者,神经症患者的工作能力改善、症状减轻和缓解率比更高水平的边缘型患者更显著,而LPP或SFT在两个LPO组中的疗效无显著差异。在神经症患者中,随访第一年短期治疗组的改善更显著,而在更高水平的边缘型患者中LPP在随访3年后更有效。对于所考虑的两个LPO组,LPP的缓解率(定义为症状减轻且无需辅助治疗)高于SPP。
在神经症中,短期心理治疗与症状更快减轻和工作能力增加相关,而LPP在两个LPO组的长期随访中更有效。需要进一步的大规模研究。
人格组织水平与短期和长期心理治疗的选择相关。短期治疗对神经症患者的益处更快,但对更高水平边缘型人格组织的患者则不然。长期治疗比短期治疗更有可能实现症状的持续缓解。