Baron A, Mattila W R
Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee 53201.
Psychol Aging. 1989 Mar;4(1):66-72. doi: 10.1037//0882-7974.4.1.66.
Younger and older men (18-25 vs. 65-76 years of age) were given extended practice (44 hr) with a memory scanning procedure in which lists of visual and auditory items were presented singly (single-task condition) or together with a second visual or auditory list (dual-task condition). For both age groups, identification of test items was slower with the dual-task procedure, and experience with the tasks produced only small changes in response latencies. When time limits were placed on responding, latencies decreased substantially, and the difference between single and divided tasks was reduced. Although the older men were slower throughout the experiment, the time limit contingency reduced age differences in responses to both tasks. The task effect was larger for the older men, but this age difference also was reduced by the time limit procedures.
年轻男性和年长男性(18 - 25岁与65 - 76岁)参与了一项关于记忆扫描程序的扩展练习(44小时)。在该程序中,视觉和听觉项目列表单独呈现(单任务条件),或者与第二个视觉或听觉列表一起呈现(双任务条件)。对于两个年龄组而言,双任务程序下测试项目的识别速度较慢,且任务经验仅使反应潜伏期产生了微小变化。当对反应设置时间限制时,潜伏期大幅缩短,单任务和多任务之间的差异减小。尽管在整个实验过程中,年长男性的反应速度较慢,但时间限制条件缩小了两个年龄组在两项任务反应上的差异。年长男性的任务效应更大,但时间限制程序也缩小了这种年龄差异。