Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts - Amherst, 441 Tobin Hall, Amherst, MA 01003, USA.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Feb;19(1):139-45. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0189-3.
In two-choice decision tasks, Starns and Ratcliff (Psychology and Aging 25: 377-390, 2010) showed that older adults are farther from the optimal speed-accuracy trade-off than young adults. They suggested that the age effect resulted from differences in task goals, with young participants focused on balancing speed and accuracy and older participants focused on minimizing errors. We compared speed-accuracy criteria with a standard procedure (blocks that had a fixed numbers of trials) to a condition in which blocks lasted a fixed amount of time and participants were instructed to get as many correct responses as possible within the time limit-a goal that explicitly required balancing speed and accuracy. Fits of the diffusion model showed that criteria differences persisted in the fixed-time condition, suggesting that age differences are not solely based on differences in task goals. Also, both groups produced more conservative criteria in difficult conditions when it would have been optimal to be more liberal.
在二择一决策任务中,Starns 和 Ratcliff(2010 年,《心理学与老龄化》第 25 卷:377-390)表明,老年人比年轻人更远离最佳的速度-准确性权衡。他们认为,年龄效应是由于任务目标的差异造成的,年轻参与者注重平衡速度和准确性,而年长参与者注重尽量减少错误。我们将速度-准确性标准与标准程序(具有固定试验次数的块)进行了比较,标准程序中块持续固定的时间,并且要求参与者在时间限制内尽可能多地获得正确的反应——这一目标明确要求平衡速度和准确性。扩散模型的拟合表明,在固定时间条件下,标准差异仍然存在,这表明年龄差异不仅仅基于任务目标的差异。此外,当更宽松是最佳选择时,两个组在困难条件下都产生了更保守的标准。