Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Initial Single-Center Experience and Comparison with Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND

Until recently, intravenous thrombolysis was the only reperfusion therapy with proven efficacy in patients with acute ischemic stroke. However, this treatment option has low recanalization rates in large-vessel occlusions. The search for additional treatments continued until 5 randomized trials (MR CLEAN, ESCAPE, EXTEND-IA, SWIFT PRIME, and REVASCAT) revealed the superiority of mechanical thrombectomy for anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion. After 1 year of performing thrombectomy with stent retrievers in our tertiary hospital, we intended to answer the question: is it possible to achieve similar results in a "real-world" setting?

METHODS

We analyzed data from our prospective observational registry, compared it with the trials aforementioned, and concluded that the answer is affirmative.

RESULTS

Our study population of 77 patients, with a mean age of 68,2 years and 48,1% men, is comparable with these trials in much of selection criteria, baseline characteristics, and rate of previous intravenous thrombolysis (72,7%). Recovery of functional independence at 90 days was achieved in almost two thirds of patients, similarly to the referred trials. We devoted special emphasis on fast recanalization, keeping a simple image selection protocol (based on non-enhanced and computed tomography angiography) and not waiting for clinical response to thrombolysis in patients eligible for mechanical thrombectomy. We emphasize a successful recanalization rate of 87% and only 2,6% symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage.

CONCLUSION

In summary, mechanical thrombectomy seems to be a safe and effective treatment option in a "real-world" scenario, with results similar to those of the recent randomized controlled trials.