Suppr超能文献

群组随机对照试验,以检验使用医用口罩作为呼吸道疾病患者的源头控制措施。

Cluster randomised controlled trial to examine medical mask use as source control for people with respiratory illness.

作者信息

MacIntyre Chandini Raina, Zhang Yi, Chughtai Abrar Ahmad, Seale Holly, Zhang Daitao, Chu Yanhui, Zhang Haiyan, Rahman Bayzidur, Wang Quanyi

机构信息

School of Public Health and Community Medicine UNSW Medicine University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

College of Public Service & Community Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2016 Dec 30;6(12):e012330. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012330.

Abstract

RATIONALE

Medical masks are commonly used by sick individuals with influenza-like illness (ILI) to prevent spread of infections to others, but clinical efficacy data are absent.

OBJECTIVE

Determine whether medical mask use by sick individuals with ILI protects well contacts from related respiratory infections.

SETTING

6 major hospitals in 2 districts of Beijing, China.

DESIGN

Cluster randomised controlled trial.

PARTICIPANTS

245 index cases with ILI.

INTERVENTION

Index cases with ILI were randomly allocated to medical mask (n=123) and control arms (n=122). Since 43 index cases in the control arm also used a mask during the study period, an as-treated post hoc analysis was performed by comparing outcomes among household members of index cases who used a mask (mask group) with household members of index cases who did not use a mask (no-mask group).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Primary outcomes measured in household members were clinical respiratory illness, ILI and laboratory-confirmed viral respiratory infection.

RESULTS

In an intention-to-treat analysis, rates of clinical respiratory illness (relative risk (RR) 0.61, 95% CI 0.18 to 2.13), ILI (RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.03 to 3.13) and laboratory-confirmed viral infections (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.06 to 15.54) were consistently lower in the mask arm compared with control, although not statistically significant. A post hoc comparison between the mask versus no-mask groups showed a protective effect against clinical respiratory illness, but not against ILI and laboratory-confirmed viral respiratory infections.

CONCLUSIONS

The study indicates a potential benefit of medical masks for source control, but is limited by small sample size and low secondary attack rates. Larger trials are needed to confirm efficacy of medical masks as source control.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ACTRN12613000852752; Results.

摘要

原理

患有流感样疾病(ILI)的患者通常使用医用口罩以防止感染传播给他人,但缺乏临床疗效数据。

目的

确定患有ILI的患者佩戴医用口罩是否能保护密切接触者免受相关呼吸道感染。

地点

中国北京两个区的6家大型医院。

设计

整群随机对照试验。

参与者

245例ILI索引病例。

干预措施

ILI索引病例被随机分配至医用口罩组(n = 123)和对照组(n = 122)。由于对照组中有43例索引病例在研究期间也使用了口罩,因此通过比较使用口罩的索引病例的家庭成员(口罩组)和未使用口罩的索引病例的家庭成员(无口罩组)的结局进行事后治疗分析。

主要结局指标

在家庭成员中测量的主要结局为临床呼吸道疾病、ILI和实验室确诊的病毒性呼吸道感染。

结果

在意向性分析中,口罩组的临床呼吸道疾病(相对风险(RR)0.61,95%置信区间0.18至2.13)、ILI(RR 0.32,95%置信区间0.03至3.13)和实验室确诊的病毒感染(RR 0.97,95%置信区间0.06至15.54)发生率与对照组相比始终较低,尽管无统计学意义。口罩组与无口罩组之间的事后比较显示对临床呼吸道疾病有保护作用,但对ILI和实验室确诊的病毒性呼吸道感染无保护作用。

结论

该研究表明医用口罩在源头控制方面有潜在益处,但受样本量小和二代发病率低的限制。需要更大规模的试验来证实医用口罩作为源头控制措施的有效性。

试验注册号

ACTRN12613000852752;结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2db/5223715/63adf8b6e8d0/bmjopen2016012330f01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验